Functional Assessment of Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits and Their Underlying Substrate Using Automated Conduction Velocity Mapping.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the utility of automated conduction velocity mapping (ACVM) in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. BACKGROUND: Identification of areas of slowed conduction velocity (CV) is critical to our understanding of VT circuits and their underlying substrate. Recently, an ACVM called Coherent Mapping (Biosense Webster Inc) has been developed for atrial mapping. However, its utility in VT mapping has not been described. METHODS: Patients with paired high-density VT activation and substrate maps were included. ACVM was applied to paired VT activation and substrate maps to assess regional CV and activation patterns. A combination of ACVM, traditional local activation time maps, electrogram analysis, and off-line calculated CV using triangulation were used to characterize zones of slowed conduction during VT and in substrate mapping. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included in the study. In all cases, ACVM identified slow CV within the putative VT isthmus, which colocalized to the VT isthmus identified with entrainment. The dimensions of the VT isthmus with local activation time mapping were 37.8 ± 13.7 mm long and 8.7 ± 4.2 mm wide. In comparison, ACVM produced an isthmus that was shorter (length: 25.1 ± 10.6 mm; mean difference: 12.8; 95% CI: 7.5-18.0; P < 0.01) and wider (width: 18.8 ± 8.1 mm; mean difference: 10.1; 95% CI: 6.1-14.2; P < 0.01). In VT, the CV using triangulation at the entrance (8.0 ± 3.6 cm/s) and midisthmus (8.1 ± 4.3 cm/s) was not significantly different (P = 0.92) but was significantly faster at the exit (16.2 ± 9.7 cm/s; P < 0.01). In the paired substrate analysis, traditional local activation time isochronal mapping identified 6.3 ± 2.0 deceleration zones. In contrast, ACVM identified a median of 0 deceleration zones (IQR: 0-1; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: ACVM is a novel complementary tool that can be used to accurately resolve complex VT circuits and identify slow conduction zones in VT but has limited accuracy in identifying slowed conduction during substrate-based mapping.

Prone and Supine 12-Lead ECG Comparisons: Implications for Cardiac Assessment During Prone Ventilation for COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe expected changes in a mirror-image prone electrocardiogram (ECG) compared with normal supine, including a range of cardiac conditions. BACKGROUND: Unwell COVID-19 patients are at risk of cardiac complications. Prone ventilation is recommended but poses practical challenges to acquisition of a 12-lead ECG. The effects of prone positioning on the ECG remain unknown. METHODS: 100 patients each underwent 3 ECGs: standard supine front (SF); prone position with precordial leads attached to front (PF); and prone with precordial leads attached to back in a mirror image to front (PB). RESULTS: Prone positioning was associated with QTc prolongation (PF 437 ± 32 ms vs. SF 432 ± 31 ms; p < 0.01; PB 436 ± 34 ms vs. SF 432 ± 31 ms; p = 0.02). In leads V1 to V3 on PB ECG, a qR morphology was present in 90% and changes in T-wave polarity in 84%. In patients with anterior ischemia, ST-segment changes in V1 to V3 on supine ECG were no longer visible on PB in 100% and replaced by an R-wave in V1. Bundle branch block (BBB) remained detectable in 100% on PB, with left BBB appearing as right BBB on PB in 71% and QRS narrowing with qR in V1 for right BBB. ST-segment/T-wave changes in limb leads and arrhythmia detection were largely unaffected in PB. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, the PB ECG is unreliable for the detection of anterior myocardial injury but remains useful for ST-segment/T-wave abnormalities in limb leads, BBB detection, and rhythm monitoring. The prone ECG is a useful screening tool with diagnostic utility in COVID-19 patients who require prone ventilation.

Assessment of ablation catheter contact on valve annulus: Implications on accessory pathway ablation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-tissue contact force is an important factor influencing lesion size and efficacy and thereby potential for arrhythmia recurrence following accessory pathway (AP) radiofrequency ablation. We aim to evaluate adequacy and perception of catheter contact on the tricuspid and mitral annuli. METHODS: Data were collected from 42 patients undergoing catheter ablation. Operators were blinded to contact force information and reported perceived contact (poor, moderate, or good) while positioning the catheter at four tricuspid annular sites (12, 9, 6 and 4 o'clock positions; abbreviated as TA12, TA9, TA6 and TA4) and three mitral annular sites (3, 5 and 7 o'clock positions; abbreviated as MA3, MA5 and MA7) through long vascular sheaths. RESULTS: The highest and lowest mean contact forces were obtained at MA7 (13.3 ±â€¯1.7 g) and TA12 (3.6 g ±â€¯1.3 g) respectively. Mean contact force on tricuspid annulus (6.1 g ±â€¯0.9 g) was lower than mitral annulus (9.8 ±â€¯0.9 g) locations (p = 0.0036), with greater proportion of sites with <10 g contact force (81.7% vs 60.4%; p = 0.0075). Perceived contact had no impact on measured mean contact force for both mitral and tricuspid annular positions (p = 0.959 and 0.671 respectively). There was correlation of both impedance and atrial electrogram amplitude with contact force, though insufficient to be clinically applicable. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of annular catheter applications have low contact force despite being performed with long vascular sheaths in the hands of experienced operators. In addition, there was no impact of operator perceived contact force on actual measured contact force. This may carry implications for success of AP ablation.

Psychological Distress and Suicidal Ideation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Prevalence and Response to Management Strategy.

Background An association between atrial fibrillation ( AF ), anxiety, and depression is recognized, but the spectrum of psychological distress remains unclear. We aimed to characterize the severity and predictors of distress associated with AF in a tertiary population and its response to AF management. Methods and Results Seventy-eight patients with symptomatic AF underwent evaluation, including of AF symptom severity, health-related quality of life, psychological distress, suicidal ideation, and specific personality traits. Twenty participants underwent AF ablation and 58 were managed medically, with repeat assessments at 4, 8, and 12 months. Severe distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, ≥15/42) was identified in 27 of 78 (35%). Independent predictors were a personality marked by vulnerability to stress (Perceived Stress Scale: R2, 0.54; ß=0.7±0.1; t=7.8; P<0.001) and 1 marked by negativity/social inhibition (Type D Personality Scale: R2, 0.47; ß=0.7±0.1; t=6.7; P<0.001). Suicidal ideation was reported by 16 of 78 (20%) and was predicted by personality traits (Perceived Stress Scale score: R2, 0.35; odds ratio, 1.22±0.06; P<0.001; Type D Personality Scale score: R2, 0.48; odds ratio, 1.43±0.14; P<0.001). Effective AF ablation (median AF burden 1% [0-1%] over 12 months) was associated with significant reductions in distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, 13.9±1.8 to 4.3±1.8; P<0.05) and prevalence of suicidal ideation (30-5%; P=0.02). Conclusions There was a high prevalence of severe psychological distress (35%) and of suicidal ideation (20%) in a tertiary AF population, with personality traits predicting both. Effective AF ablation was associated with significant improvements, suggesting AF itself may be a treatable causative factor of distress.

Determining the Optimal Dose of Adenosine for Unmasking Dormant Pulmonary Vein Conduction Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Electrophysiological and Hemodynamic Assessment. DORMANT-AF Study.

INTRODUCTION: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT. DORMANT-AF STUDY: The significance of adenosine induced dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains controversial. The optimal dose of adenosine to determine dormant PV conduction is yet to be systematically explored. METHODS AND RESULTS: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT. DORMANT-AF STUDY: Consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation received 3 adenosine doses (12, 18, and 24 mg) in a randomized blinded order, immediately after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Electrophysiological (PR prolongation, AV block (AVB) and PV reconnection) and hemodynamic (BP) parameters were measured. A total, 339 doses (113/dose) assessed 191 PVs in 50 patients (66% male, 72% PAF, 52% hypertensive). Dormant PV conduction occurred in 28% of patients (16.5% [32] of PVs). All cases were associated with AVB (AVB: PV reconnection vs. no PV reconnection 100% vs. 83%, P = 0.007). AVB occurred more frequently at 24 mg versus 12 mg (92% vs. 82%, P = 0.019) but not versus 18 mg (91%, P = 0.62). AVB duration progressed between 12 mg (12.0 ± 8.9 seconds), 18 mg (16.1 ± 9.1 seconds, P = 0.001), and 24 mg (19.0 ± 9.3 seconds, P < 0.001) doses. MBP fell further at 24 mg (ΔMBP: 27 ± 12 mmHg) and 18 mg (26 ± 13 mmHg) doses compared to 12 mg (22 ± 10 mmHg vs., P < 0.001). A significant reduction in AVB in patients >110 kg (65% vs. 91% in 70-110 kg group, P < 0.001) in response to adenosine was seen. CONCLUSION: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT. DORMANT-AF STUDY: An adenosine dose producing AVB is required to unmask dormant PV conduction. AVB is significantly reduced in patients >110 kg. Weight and dosing variability may in part explain the conflicting results of studies evaluating the clinical utility of adenosine in PVI.

Ten-year trends in the use of catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation vs. the use of coronary intervention for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease in Australia.

AIMS: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and catheter ablation are well-accepted therapeutic interventions for treatment of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation (AF), respectively. We sought to examine temporal trends in the provision of these services over the past decade in Australia. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective review of the numbers of PCIs and AF ablations from 2000/01 to 2009/10 was performed on data from three sources: the Australian Institute of Health, Welfare and Aging (AIHW), Medicare Australia database (MA), and local records at a high volume tertiary referral centre (RMH) for AF ablation. Linear regression models were fitted comparing trends in population-adjusted procedural numbers over the 10-year period. There was a 5% per year population-adjusted increment in PCIs over 10 years from both the AIHW and MA sources, respectively (P < 0.001). This was similar to the growth rate of all cardiovascular procedures (AIHW: 5.1 vs. 3.8%/year, P = 0.27). Atrial fibrillation ablations showed a 30.9, 23.2, and 39.8% per year population-adjusted increment over 10 years from the AIHW, MA, and RMH sources respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Growth of AF ablations was significantly higher than PCIs (P < 0.001 for AIHW and MA sources) and all cardiovascular procedures (AIHW: 30.9 vs. 3.8%/year, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The provision of catheter-based AF ablation services in Australia has increased exponentially over the past decade. Its annual growth rate exceeded that of PCIs and all cardiovascular procedures. Given the increasing epidemic of AF, these data have critical implications for public health policy assessing the adequacy of infrastructure, training, and funding for AF ablation services.

A randomized trial to compare atrial fibrillation ablation using a steerable vs. a non-steerable sheath.

AIMS: Catheter positioning and stability are recognized challenges in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). This prospective randomized study assessed whether routinely using a steerable sheath affects procedure outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six AF patients were randomized to ablation using either an Agilis NXT (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA) steerable sheath or a fixed-curve Mullins sheath (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) for the ablation catheter. A mapping system with CT integration was used to isolate the pulmonary veins (PVs) in pairs and further ablation performed if AF persisted. There was no significant difference in time to gain trans-septal access, CT registration time, time to isolate PVs, fluoroscopy time for PV isolation, total procedure time, or total fluoroscopy time. A learning curve was seen for the steerable sheath, and after correcting for this, CT registration time and right PV isolation were quicker in this group. One patient crossed over from fixed-curve to steerable. Acute, 3-, and 6-month single procedure success were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Allowing for the usage learning curve, a steerable sheath reduced time for some elements of AF ablation. Although this did not result in improved success, it may be useful for inexperienced operators, but at increased procedure cost.

Current case mix and results of catheter ablation of regular supraventricular tachycardia: are we giving unrealistic expectations to patients?

AIMS: Catheter ablation (CA) has become the treatment of choice for regular supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the current clinical results in a large single centre are as good as success rates quoted to patients from published trials and national cardiology society websites. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recorded and analysed prospectively the acute and follow-up (FU) results of all CA procedures performed for SVT at our institution over a 2-year period. We compared our results with the success rates of 90-98% for CA quoted in the literature. We performed a total of 547 CA at our institution over 2 years, of which 389 (71%) were for regular SVT. Of these, 71 procedures (18%) were redo procedures. The overall acute procedural success rate was 96.1% (374/389). Follow-up data were available for 367 of 389 (94.3%) procedures. The overall 6-week success rate varied between 74.7 and 91.3% depending on the SVT type (average 83.9%). The FU success rates were lower for redo procedures (47/66, 71.2%) when compared with first ablation (de novo) procedures (261/301, 86.7%), P = 0.003. CONCLUSION: Published success rates are much better than current success rates in a large single centre. It is possible that the information regarding outcome given to patients during the consent process is not accurate.