Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement of 18F-FDG PET/CT Image Interpretation in Patients Referred for Assessment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Recent studies have reported the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in aiding with the diagnosis and management of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). However, image interpretation of 18F-FDG PET for CS is sometimes challenging. We sought to investigate the inter- and intraobserver agreement and explore factors that led to important discrepancies between readers. Methods: We studied consecutive patients with no significant coronary artery disease who were referred for assessment of CS. Two experienced readers masked to clinical information, imaging reports, independently reviewed 18F-FDG PET/CT images. 18F-FDG PET/CT images were interpreted according to a predefined standard operating procedure, with cardiac 18F-FDG uptake patterns categorized into 5 patterns: none, focal, focal on diffuse, diffuse, and isolated lateral wall or basal uptake. Overall image assessment was classified as either consistent with active CS or not. Results: One hundred scans were included from 71 patients. Of these, 46 underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT with a no-restriction diet (no-restriction group), and 54 underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT with a low-carbohydrate, high-fat and protein-permitted diet (low-carb group). There was agreement of the interpretation category in 74 of 100 scans. The κ-value of agreement among all 5 categories was 0.64, indicating moderate agreement. For overall clinical interpretation, there was agreement in 93 of 100 scans (κ = 0.85). When scans were divided into the preparation groups, there was a trend toward higher agreement in the low-carb group versus the no-restriction group (80% vs. 67%, P = 0.08). Regarding the overall clinical interpretation, there was also a trend toward greater agreement in the low-carb group versus the no-restriction group (96% vs. 89%, P = 0.08). Conclusion: The interobserver agreement of cardiac 18F-FDG uptake image patterns was moderate. However, agreement was better regarding overall interpretation of CS. Detailed prescan dietary preparation seemed to improve interobserver agreement.

Validation of a Multimodality Flow Phantom and Its Application for Assessment of Dynamic SPECT and PET Technologies.

Simple and robust techniques are lacking to assess performance of flow quantification using dynamic imaging. We therefore developed a method to qualify flow quantification technologies using a physical compartment exchange phantom and image analysis tool. We validate and demonstrate utility of this method using dynamic PET and SPECT. Dynamic image sequences were acquired on two PET/CT and a cardiac dedicated SPECT (with and without attenuation and scatter corrections) systems. A two-compartment exchange model was fit to image derived time-activity curves to quantify flow rates. Flowmeter measured flow rates (20-300 mL/min) were set prior to imaging and were used as reference truth to which image derived flow rates were compared. Both PET cameras had excellent agreement with truth ( [Formula: see text]). High-end PET had no significant bias (p > 0.05) while lower-end PET had minimal slope bias (wash-in and wash-out slopes were 1.02 and 1.01) but no significant reduction in precision relative to high-end PET (<15% vs. <14% limits of agreement, p > 0.3). SPECT (without scatter and attenuation corrections) slope biases were noted (0.85 and 1.32) and attributed to camera saturation in early time frames. Analysis of wash-out rates from non-saturated, late time frames resulted in excellent agreement with truth ( [Formula: see text], slope = 0.97). Attenuation and scatter corrections did not significantly impact SPECT performance. The proposed phantom, software and quality assurance paradigm can be used to qualify imaging instrumentation and protocols for quantification of kinetic rate parameters using dynamic imaging.

Cardiac CT assessment of left ventricular mass in mid-diastasis and its prognostic value.

AIMS: To determine the influence of cardiac motion on measurements of left ventricular (LV) mass obtained with 64-slice computed tomography (CT) and to elucidate the prognostic value of LV mass on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Increased LV mass has been linked with MACE. Although Cardiac CT allows measurement of LV anatomy, it is susceptible to motion artefacts often requiring image acquisition during diastasis. There is a need to understand variability in LV mass measurements across phases of the cardiac cycle, and whether mid-diastolic measurements have prognostic value. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study comprised two equally sized cohorts of patients that had undergone retrospectively gated cardiac CT: patients who had MACE and/or all-cause death at follow-up and a matched (age, sex, and risk factors) event-free cohort. LV mass was measured at mid-diastole, end-diastole, and end-systole. Correlation and agreement between phases were determined. The incremental value of mid-diastolic hypertrophy (LVH) over the National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) risk was performed for LV mass indices normalized to body surface area (LVMIBSA) or weight (LVMIWeight). Of 166 patients, 31.3% experienced MACE and 28.9% died of any cause (follow-up 22.9 ± 13.4 months). LV mass at all cardiac phases were strongly correlated (r > 0.94). Mean mid-diastolic LVMIBSA was higher in the cohort with events (93.7 vs. 80.7 g/m2, P= 0.008) as was LVMIWeight (2.26 vs. 1.88 g/kg, P = 0.001). LVMIBSA and LVMIWeight had prognostic value incremental to NCEP with 1.85 and 2.47 hazard ratios, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of LV mass can be obtained by cardiac CT images obtained at mid-diastasis. LV mass measurements obtained at mid-diastasis have prognostic value.

Routine versus selective cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischemic heart failure - OUTSMART-HF: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (IMAGE-HF (heart failure) project 1-B).

BACKGROUND: Imaging has become a routine part of heart failure (HF) investigation. Echocardiography is a first-line test in HF given its availability and it provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an emerging clinical tool in the management of patients with non-ischemic heart failure. Current ACC/AHA/CCS/ESC guidelines advocate its role in the detection of a variety of cardiomyopathies but there is a paucity of high quality evidence to support these recommendations.The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic yield of routine cardiac magnetic resonance versus standard care (that is, echocardiography with only selective use of CMR) in patients with non-ischemic heart failure. The primary hypothesisis that the routine use of CMR will lead to a more specific diagnostic characterization of the underlying etiology of non-ischemic heart failure. This will lead to a reduction in the non-specific diagnoses of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and HF with preserved ejection fraction. DESIGN: Tertiary care sites in Canada and Finland, with dedicated HF and CMR programs, will randomize consecutive patients with new or deteriorating HF to routine CMR or selective CMR. All patients will undergo a standard clinical echocardiogram and the interpreter will assign the most likely HF etiology. Those undergoing CMR will also have a standard examination and will be assigned a HF etiology based upon the findings. The treating physician's impression about non-ischemic HF etiology will be collected following all baseline testing (including echo ± CMR). Patients will be followed annually for 4 years to ascertain clinical outcomes, quality of life and cost. The expected outcome is that the routine CMR arm will have a significantly higher rate of infiltrative, inflammatory, hypertrophic, ischemic and 'other' cardiomyopathy than the selective CMR group. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first multicenter randomized, controlled trial evaluating the role of CMR in non-ischemic HF. Non-ischemic HF patients will be randomized to routine CMR in order to determine whether there are any gains over management strategies employing selective CMR utilization. The insight gained from this study should improve appropriate CMR use in HF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01281384.