[Structural quality in psychiatric and psychotherapeutic hospitals]. / Strukturqualität in psychiatrischen und psychotherapeutischen Kliniken.

BACKGROUND: The new German flat rate reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) is primarily based on the diagnostic classification and the costs of therapeutic processes. In 2019 the current normative standard for calculating the therapeutic staff in psychiatric clinics (Psych-PV) will be substituted by a stepwise adaptation process over 5 years. Using regionally calculated remuneration factors, all clinic budgets should eventually converge to comparable values. AIM: Major factors influencing the structural quality of therapy in psychiatric clinics are identified and recommendations are given to support the work of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) which has been appointed to develop new recommendations for the minimum setting of personnel requirements. RESULTS: The full reimbursement of the necessary staff and of the costs resulting from outsourcing of day clinics and outpatient departments in the community, including the obligation to treat psychiatric emergency patients is mandatory and currently not sufficiently guaranteed in the new PEPP system. A workflow which opens the possibility to finance therapeutic innovations (e.g. psychotherapy) and helps to overcome the financial sectorial boundaries between inpatient and outpatient treatment is also missing. DISCUSSION: A mandatory recommendation for minimum staff settings needs a guaranteed full financing from the political side. Additionally, important would be an option for financing of therapeutic innovations and increased costs because of changed patient structures with respect to diagnosis and severity. Moreover, a sufficient remuneration for regional treatment responsibilities and for additional financial outlay resulting from structural costs for regionally outsourced departments is needed to avoid supplementary financing by reducing the budget for the therapeutic staff.

[Where is convergence of psychiatry budgets leading to? A comparison of staffing regulations and actual personnel resources]. / Wohin führt die Konvergenz der Psychiatriebudgets? Ein Vergleich von Psych-PV-Vorgaben und tatsächlichen Personalressourcen.

BACKGROUND: Staffing regulations have determined the number of qualified staff required for sufficient, appropriate and economical inpatient mental health care in Germany since 1991. This minimum level of structural quality will probably be abolished in the context of the convergence of hospital budgets starting in 2019. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the current fulfilment of staffing regulations in terms of time per patient in a large nationwide sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The required minutes of staff time as defined by staffing regulations were calculated for each patient using the treatment classifications provided by a large nationwide database. The actual use of staff time was calculated on the basis of average costs published by the German Institute for Hospital Reimbursement. Both figures were compared to calculate the fulfilment of staffing regulations. RESULTS: The study included approximately 95,000 inpatient episodes from 46 psychiatric hospitals and departments with a total length of stay of almost 2.5 million days. On average, the weekly use of staff resources per patient was 190 min (10 %) below the requirements of the staffing regulations. The largest gap in absolute terms was found in nursing staff where the weekly time per patient was 189 min (14 %) below the requirements of the staffing regulations. CONCLUSION: The convergence of psychiatric hospital budgets starts in 2019 below a level of funding required to fulfil staffing regulations. This would perpetuate inadequately funded structures and should initially be opposed with a demand for complete fulfilment of staffing regulations. Thereafter, a normative consent should be reached to define the resources required for current inpatient mental health care.

[Reimbursement in psychiatry and psychosomatics: proof of concept for a system based on daily costs]. / Vergütungssystem für Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik: Studie zur Machbarkeit eines tageskostenbasierten Entgeltsystems.

BACKGROUND: In Germany a new reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics is under development. Based on total costs of each case from selected hospitals and day clinics, in 2013 the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) proposed to reimburse the hospital costs daily with step-wise decreasing remuneration, mainly depending on the ICD-10 diagnosis, duration of stay and some complicating factors (PEPP grouper). It is controversial whether this degressive system will result in an inadequate remuneration of patients with longer duration of severe symptoms, such as suicidality in depression or autoaggressive behavior in borderline personality disorder and will eventually lead to advantages for acutely ill patients with short duration of stay compared to chronically ill patients. OBJECTIVES: This study formulated and tested an alternative remuneration system (proof of concept) mainly based on an analysis of daily cost data instead of the total costs of each case. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is based on 147,749 treatment days from 4,633 cases of patients with psychotic disorders (PEPP-PA03) in 6 hospitals. As possible cost separating factors the study analyzed days with and without intensive psychiatric care, 1 to 1 care, psychological diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acute crisis intervention, age at admission, the first days of treatment and day of discharge. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Nearly all factors tested were shown to be statistically significant in separating daily hospital costs. Based on these findings an alternative calculation algorithm (TEPPconcret), which grouped the cases with respect to age, intensive care, 1 to 1 care, treatment days 1-4 and day of discharge, was formulated and tested. For psychotic disorders TEPPconcret with a basic rate complemented by daily add-on payments depending on the effort involved, is a serious alternative to the PEPP system and awaits further evaluation.

[A new method for the treatment of depression: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation]. / Ein neues Behandlungsverfahren der Depression: Die repetitive transkranielle Magnetstimulation (rTMS).

Recent data suggest that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in treating depressive symptoms to a lesser extent compared with classical electroconvulsive therapy. However, rTMS represents an economical and well tolerable procedure in relation to the expenditure of electroconvulsive therapy with anaesthesia. Usually, rTMS is applicated as an add-on-therapy accompanying psychopharmacological treatment. So far, it has predominantly been used for patients with long-standing and so called treatment-refractory symptoms. However, even in the early phase of a depressive episode rTMS would be possibly more effective. In many cases, the standard procedure-application of up to 10 rTMS-sessions will not be enough to produce therapeutic benefit. Therefore rTMS series including up to 20 sessions are recommended. Long-term studies are needed to clarify the role of rTMS for relapse prevention and to determine the optimal frequency and duration of rTMS in such an indication. Although numerous results of newer studies suggest a moderate antidepressive effect of rTMS, its application in daily clinical routine practice cannot be recommended yet. Larger, accurate designed and controlled studies, especially involving patients of old age, are needed to evaluate the true tolerability and effectiveness of rTMS as a new treatment option for depressive symptoms.