Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 9(8): e105207, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25144226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Information on causes of death (CODs) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in the United States is sparse and limited by standard categorizations of underlying and immediate CODs on death certificates. Prior research indicated that excess mortality among MS patients was largely due to greater mortality from infectious, cardiovascular, or pulmonary causes. OBJECTIVE: To analyze disease categories in order to gain insight to pathways, which lead directly to death in MS patients. METHODS: Commercially insured MS patients enrolled in the OptumInsight Research database between 1996 and 2009 were matched to non-MS comparators on age/residence at index year and sex. The cause most-directly leading to death from the death certificate, referred to as the "principal" COD, was determined using an algorithm to minimize the selection of either MS or cardiac/pulmonary arrest as the COD. Principal CODs were categorized into MS, cancer, cardiovascular, infectious, suicide, accidental, pulmonary, other, or unknown. Infectious, cardiovascular, and pulmonary CODs were further subcategorized. RESULTS: 30,402 MS patients were matched to 89,818 controls, with mortality rates of 899 and 446 deaths/100,000 person-years, respectively. Excluding MS, differences in mortality rate between MS patients and non-MS comparators were largely attributable to infections, cardiovascular causes, and pulmonary problems. Of the 95 excessive deaths (per 100,000 person-years) related to infectious causes, 41 (43.2%) were due to pulmonary infections and 45 (47.4%) were attributed to sepsis. Of the 46 excessive deaths (per 100,000 person-years) related to pulmonary causes, 27 (58.7%) were due to aspiration. No single diagnostic entity predominated for the 60 excessive deaths (per 100,000 person-years) attributable to cardiac CODs. CONCLUSIONS: The principal COD algorithm improved on other methods of determining COD in MS patients from death certificates. A greater awareness of the common CODs in MS patients will allow physicians to anticipate potential problems and, thereby, improve the care that they provide.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Adulto , Atestado de Óbito , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Clin Ther ; 34(5): 1132-44, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22541587

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess, from a Swedish societal perspective, the cost effectiveness of interferon ß-1b (IFNB-1b) after an initial clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) (ie, early treatment) compared with treatment after onset of clinically definite MS (CDMS) (ie, delayed treatment). METHODS: A Markov model was developed, using patient level data from the BENEFIT trial and published literature, to estimate health outcomes and costs associated with IFNB-1b for hypothetical cohorts of patients after an initial clinical event suggestive of MS. Health states were defined by Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Model outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs (including both direct and indirect costs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key model parameters to assess the robustness of model results. RESULTS: In the base case scenario, early IFNB-1b treatment was economically dominant (ie, less costly and more effective) versus delayed IFNB-1b treatment when QALYs were used as the effectiveness metric. Sensitivity analyses showed that the cost-effectiveness results were sensitive to model time horizon. Compared with the delayed treatment strategy, early treatment of MS was also associated with delayed EDSS progressions, prolonged time to CDMS diagnosis, and a reduction in frequency of relapse. CONCLUSION: Early treatment with IFNB-1b for a first clinical event suggestive of MS was found to improve patient outcomes while controlling costs.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Interferon beta/uso terapêutico , Modelos Econômicos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Interferon beta-1b , Interferon beta/administração & dosagem , Interferon beta/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Esclerose Múltipla/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Suécia , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Clin Ther ; 33(7): 914-25, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21684600

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown that treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), such as interferon, at the time of clinically isolated syndrome can delay the onset of multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess health care utilization and expenditures associated with treating patients early with DMTs rather than delaying until patients meet the full diagnostic criteria of MS. METHODS: A retrospective study used insurance claims data (2000-2008) of enrolled patients before documented MS (1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification 340 coding). Treatment cohorts were early DMT (DMT claim before the first documented MS; N = 227) and delayed DMT (DMT started after documented MS; N = 3724). Comparisons during 1 year of follow-up were adjusted for confounding using multivariate methods. RESULTS: Adjusted annual per-patient expenditures (including patient out of pocket) for early versus delayed were as follows: total ($28,280 vs $29,102; P = 0.44), excluding DMT cost ($15,214 vs $17,630; P < 0.01), and MS-related ($9365 vs $13,661; P < 0.01). Hospitalizations were 10.1% versus 16.5% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis indicated that early DMT treatment was associated with fewer hospitalizations than delayed treatment, and there was no statistically significant difference in annual health care expenditures. This suggests that the drug costs of early therapy were offset by savings in other medical expenditures.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/economia , Adulto , Redução de Custos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Acetato de Glatiramer , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Interferon beta/administração & dosagem , Interferon beta/economia , Interferon beta/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/economia , Análise Multivariada , Peptídeos/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos/economia , Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Am Heart J ; 156(1): 106-11, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18585504

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of aspirin alone and statins alone has been shown to reduce markers of inflammation, including C-reactive protein (CRP); however, their combination has been poorly studied. METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis of black and white adults > or =45 years old from the REGARDS cohort, the associations of aspirin and statin use with CRP were examined. Individuals requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy or those taking aspirin for reasons other than cardioprotection were excluded from analysis. Participants were classified into 1 of 4 groups: aspirin only (n = 3,673), statin only (n = 1,898), both agents (n = 3,008), or neither agent (n = 7,718). RESULTS: Estimated mean CRP was 2.78 mg/L for subjects taking neither drug, 2.73 mg/L with aspirin only, 2.29 mg/L with statins only, and 2.03 mg/L for subjects taking both agents. The combined use of both agents was associated with an apparent synergistically lower CRP; the mean CRP level among these combined users was 0.21 mg/L lower than that anticipated from additive association related to aspirin and statins alone (P for interaction = .01). Associations were larger among participants reporting a history of cardiovascular disease. In addition, among statin users, the use of aspirin for >5 years compared with < or =5 years was associated with apparent significantly lower CRP concentrations (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of aspirin and statins was associated with a synergistically lower CRP concentration, especially among participants taking aspirin for >5 years. Given the limitations of this study and the modest associations, randomized controlled trial evidence is needed to confirm the findings.


Assuntos
Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Proteína C-Reativa/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Probabilidade , Prognóstico , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA