Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Haematol ; 112(4): 554-565, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38083800

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Flow cytometry with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) allows to characterize molecular changes of platelet function caused by this physiologically important activation, but the methodology has not been thoroughly investigated, standardized and characterized yet. We analyzed the influence of several major variables and chose optimal conditions for platelet function assessment. METHODS: For activation, 2.5 µM CaCl2 , 5 µM ADP and antibodies were added to diluted blood and incubated for 15 min. We analyzed kinetics of antibody binding and effects of their addition sequence, agonist concentration, blood dilution, exogenous calcium addition and platelet fixation. RESULTS: We tested our protocol on 11 healthy children, 22 healthy adult volunteers, 9 patients after a month on dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 7 adult patients and 14 children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We found that our protocol is highly sensitive to ADP stimulation with low percentage of aggregates formation. The assay is also sensitive to platelet function inhibition in post-PCI patients. Finally, platelet preactivation with ITP plasma was stronger and caused increase in activation response to ADP stimulation compared to preactivation with low dose of ADP. CONCLUSIONS: Our assay is sensitive to antiplatelet therapy and platelet preactivation in ITP patients under physiological conditions with minimal percentage of aggregates formation.


Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/terapia , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Difosfato de Adenosina/farmacologia , Difosfato de Adenosina/metabolismo , Difosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Agregação Plaquetária , Ativação Plaquetária
2.
Adv Ther ; 41(1): 182-197, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864626

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The present real-world analysis aims to compare the drug utilization, hospitalizations and direct healthcare costs related to the use of single-pill combination (SPC) or free-equivalent combination (FEC) of perindopril and bisoprolol (PER/BIS) in a large Italian population. METHODS: This observational retrospective analysis was based on administrative databases covering approximately 7 million subjects across Italy. All adult subjects receiving PER/BIS as SPC or FEC between January 2017-June 2020 were included. Subjects were followed for 1 year after the first prescription of PER/BIS as FEC (± 1 month) or SPC. Before comparing the SPC and FEC cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. Drug utilization was investigated as adherence (defined by the proportion of days covered, PDC) and persistence (evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves). Hospitalizations and mean annual direct healthcare costs (due to drug prescriptions, hospitalizations and use of outpatient services) were analyzed during follow-up. RESULTS: The original cohort included 11,440 and 6521 patients taking the SPC and FEC PER/BIS combination, respectively. After PSM, two balanced SPC and FEC cohorts of 4688 patients were obtained (mean age 70 years, approximately 50% male, 24% in secondary prevention). The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥ 80%) was higher for those on SPC (45.5%) than those on FEC (38.6%), p < 0.001. The PER/BIS combination was discontinued by 35.8% of patients in the SPC cohort and 41.7% in the FEC cohort (p < 0.001). The SPC cohort had fewer cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (5.3%) than the free-combination cohort (7.4%), p < 0.001. Mean annual total healthcare costs were lower in the SPC (1999€) than in the FEC (2359€) cohort (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, patients treated with PER/BIS SPC showed higher adherence, lower risk of drug discontinuation, reduced risk of CV hospitalization, and lower healthcare costs than those on FEC of the same drugs.


Patients with cardiovascular conditions often need to take many pills. This may result in patients not taking their pills as prescribed (i.e., low adherence) and compromise the potential benefits derived from prescription of cardiovascular protective drugs. Simplifying treatment by combining drugs into a single pill can improve adherence and, consequently, patient outcomes. In this analysis using data from real clinical practice, we explored whether using a single pill of perindopril and bisoprolol is associated with higher levels of adherence, lower proportion of patients with hospitalizations and lower economic costs than using the same drugs prescribed as free-equivalent combination in a large sample of the Italian population of approximately 7 million people. We identified two groups of patients taking single pill or free-equivalent combination of perindopril and bisoprolol (4688 patients in each cohort). Over 1-year follow-up, patients taking single pill were more likely to be adherent and were less likely to stop taking their treatment. They also had fewer cardiovascular hospitalizations with shorter hospital admission and had lower healthcare direct costs. In conclusion, simplifying treatment by combining perindopril and bisoprolol in a single pill instead of two may have a positive effect on adherence, outcomes and healthcare costs already after 1 year.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Perindopril , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Perindopril/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Bisoprolol/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Atenção à Saúde , Adesão à Medicação
3.
Oman Med J ; 37(6): e443, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36458236

RESUMO

Objectives: Initial reports indicate a high incidence of abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with COVID-19 and possible association with acute kidney injury (AKI). We aimed to investigate clinical features of elevated transaminases on admission, its association with AKI, and outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the registered data of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and assessment of the AST and ALT was performed. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI) and hospital-acquired AKI (HA-AKI). Results: The subjects comprised 828 patients (mean age = 65.0±16.0 years; 51.4% male). Hypertension was present in 70.3% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 26.0%, and chronic kidney disease in 8.5%. In-hospital mortality was 21.0%. At admission, only 41.5% of patients had hypertransaminasemia. Patients with elevated transaminases at admission were younger, had higher levels of inflammatory markers and D-dimer, and poorer outcomes. The AKI incidence in the study population was 27.1%. Patients with hypertransaminasemia were more likely to develop AKI (33.5% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.003). Patients with predominantly elevated AST (compared to elevated ALT) were more likely to have adverse outcomes. Multinomial logistic regression found that hypertension, chronic kidney disease, elevated AST, and hematuria were associated with CA-AKI. Meanwhile, age > 65 years, hypertension, malignancy, elevated AST, and hematuria were predictors of HA-AKI. Conclusions: Elevated transaminases on admission were associated with AKI and poor outcomes. Patients with elevated AST were more likely to have adverse outcomes. Elevated AST on admission was associated with CA-AKI and was a predictor of HA-AKI.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA