Risk Factors for Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events in Patients After the Fontan Operation (Insights from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan).

Risk stratification of thromboembolic events (TEs) and bleeding events is important for the appropriate selection of thromboprophylaxis in patients after the Fontan operation. Therefore, we clarified the risk factors for TEs and bleeding events in patients after the Fontan operation using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 2,515 patients who underwent the Fontan operation between June 2011 and September 2019. The end points were TEs and bleeding events within 1 year of the Fontan operation analysis. We analyzed the risk factors for these end points using a multivariate analysis. In total, 1,903 patients were included in the analysis. The median age at the time of the Fontan operation was 3 (1 to 22) years, and 1,067 patients (56%) were male. The incidence rates of TEs and bleeding events were 12% and 11%, respectively. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1 per 1 year older, p <0.05) was an independent risk factor for TEs. Thromboprophylaxis with aspirin after the Fontan operation significantly reduced TEs (OR 0.3, p <0.05). A history of postoperative hemorrhage (OR 1.5, p <0.05) and the use of a potassium channel blocker (OR 2.1, p <0.05) were independent risk factors for bleeding events. In conclusion, aspirin was found to reduce the risk of TEs within 1 year of the Fontan operation. The results of this study will be useful in selecting effective and safe thromboprophylaxis in patients after the Fontan operation.

[Rubric Assessment for Pharmacotherapy in Spiral Curriculum: Development and Usefulness Evaluation].

A requirement, which students must satisfy, for a diploma at the Showa University School of Pharmacy is the ability to "plan, practice, and assess pharmacotherapy". To continuously assess the ability of students to meet this requirement and to provide patients with proper pharmacotherapy during student clinical rotations, we formulated the "Rubric assessment for pharmacotherapy" and evaluated its usefulness in tutorial learning classes. Clinical pharmacy faculty members created the rubric based on the Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (SOAP) note guidelines of the university. Third- (2016) and fourth-year students (2017) were required to self-assess their SOAP notes to analyze six clinical cases using the rubric. The rubric consists of three domains: (1) Evaluation of patient condition, (2) Proposal of pharmacotherapy, and (3) Plan for an assessment of pharmacotherapy. The rubric comprises 31 subdomains and is evaluated according to four levels of performance. In this study, 978 rubric sheets that were used by students to evaluate their own SOAP notes were analyzed. We found that the students were able to continuously self-assess their performance using the rubric while continuously improving their achievement level (p<0.05). The results of this study suggest that rubric assessments may be used as a tool for supporting students to plan, practice, and assess pharmacotherapy.

[QOL Assessment in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Receiving Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir or Simeprevir/Peginterferon/Ribavirin in Clinical Practice].

Recently, a clinical study using a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) showed that ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF)-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of IFN/ribavirin (RBV)-treated patients. However, no study has reported QOL assessment in clinical practice. In this study, we compared the QOL between patients treated with LDV/SOF and those treated with simeprevir (SMV)/peginterferon (Peg-IFN)/RBV to provide QOL information in clinical practice. The subjects were 169 patients with type I chronic hepatitis C or compensated cirrhosis C (Child-Pugh Grade A) who were treated with SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV or LDV/SOF in Hitachi General Hospital. The QOL was assessed ≥2 weeks after the start of administration using the Japanese version of the CLDQ (Kida et al., 2008 version). The total CLDQ score in the LDV/SOF group was significantly higher than in the SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV group (6.59 vs. 6.38, respectively, p=0.007). In particular, the scores for 4 domains (abdominal symptoms, systemic symptoms, activity, and emotional function) in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). Furthermore, the rates of patients scoring 7 (no symptom) on 8 items in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). In clinical practice, LDV/SOF-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of those receiving conventional treatment with IFN and RBV. This study may make it possible for health care professionals to provide clinical QOL information on LDV/SOF therapy to patients. Furthermore, QOL information may promote decision-making for treatment, leading to effective treatment.

[A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sunitinib vs. Interferon-alpha in Patient with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in Japan].

Sunitinib has been shown to offer clinical benefits during the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, molecular targeting drugs are expensive and can have a significant impact on medical expenses. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of sunitinib as a first-line therapy compared with interferon-alpha (IFN-α) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. A Markov model was used to show the clinical courses of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received sunitinib or IFN-α. The transition probabilities and utilities employed in this Markov model were derived from two sources. This study focused on the perspective of public healthcare payer, as only direct medical costs were estimated from the treatment schedule for metastatic renal cell cancer. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, outcomes were valued in terms of life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) during the cost-effectiveness analysis. The results were tested using Monte Carlo simulations. Sunitinib and IFN-α treatment resulted in LYs of 2.40 years and 2.03 years, QALYs of 1.58 and 1.25, and expected costs of 13,572,629 yen and 6,083,002 yen, respectively. As a result, the ICER associated with replacing IFN-α with sunitinib was 22,695,839 yen/QALYs. Our results suggest that compared with IFN-α, sunitinib prolongs LYs and QALYs, but the increases in quality achieved by sunitinib are more expensive than those produced by IFN-α.

The exploration of population pharmacokinetic model for meropenem in augmented renal clearance and investigation of optimum setting of dose.

In recent years, augmented renal clearance (ARC), in which renal function is excessively enhanced, has been reported, and its influence on ß-lactam antibiotics has been investigated. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimum population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in patients with sepsis with ARC, and evaluated dosing regimens based on renal function. Seventeen subjects (6 with ARC and 11 without) were enrolled in this study. Predicted meropenem concentrations were evaluated for bias and precision using the Bland-Altman method. To examine the dosing regimen, Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR). In patients with ARC, the bias (average of the predicted value and measured value residuals) of models constructed by Crandon et al. (2011), Roberts et al. (2009), and Jaruratanasirikul et al. (2015) were 5.96 µg/mL, 10.91 µg/mL, and 4.41 µg/mL, respectively. Following 2 g meropenem every 8 h (180 min infusion), CFR ≥ 90%, a criterion of success for empirical therapy, was achieved, even with creatinine clearance of 130-250 mL/min. For patients with sepsis and ARC, the model of Jaruratanasirikul et al. showed the highest degree of accuracy and precision and confirmed the efficacy of the meropenem dosing regimen in this patient population.

[Advanced curriculum for clinical assessment and skill in new age pharmacist education].

In Showa University School of pharmacy, 7 competencies for outcome-based education were set up in 2011. We are now creating sequential curriculum in order to achieve these competencies. As a member of team medical treatment, pharmacist must share a patient's information with other members, assess each patient's condition, propose the best medication with evidence, and also check the effect of medication. Therefore, many active practices in a hospital and community and problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials are carried out in curriculum in School of Pharmacy. As a training for the future pharmacists who positively perform primary care with responsibility in community pharmacy, students study the method of clinical assessment (assessment of condition of disease from the patient's complain, and choice of appropriate proposal). Furthermore, the exercise and training of parenteral medication, physical assessment, and first aid, etc. are also taken in the curriculums as new clinical skill. The systematic and gradual interprofessional education curriculum for the team medical education has been carried out aiming at training of active members in medical team in a hospital and community. At this symposium, I will introduce these systematic advanced curriculums for the pharmacist of a new age, and to show the usefulness and learning effect.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy with GEM or S-1 for patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy for patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer, we compared two regimens containing either gemcitabine (GEM) or S-1. METHODS: We developed a decision tree that showed the clinical processes of non-resectable pancreatic cancer patients. We calculated the probabilities of endpoint and life months gained (LMG) based on previously reported articles. To estimate the costs, we analyzed medical records of 44 inpatients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer treated with GEM(n=34)or S-1(n=10). Sensitivity analysis was used to check the robustness of the results. RESULTS: In the GEM group and S-1 group, costs were 1,636,393 and 985,042 yen, and LMG was 6. 0 and 9. 0 months, respectively. Thus, the cost-effectiveness ratio(CER)was calculated to be 272,732 and 109,449 yen/LMG, respectively, and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was -217,117 yen/LMG. The sensitivity analysis showed that the result was definitely robust. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the markedly cost-effective S-1 regimen could prolong LMG with less cost than the GEM regimen.

[Cost effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin/fluorouracil and nedaplatin/fluorouracil for patients with esophageal cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for patients with esophageal cancer, we compared two regimens consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (CDDP) or 5-FU and nedaplatin (CDGP) with radiotherapy. METHODS: Medical records of 108 patients with esophageal cancer who received CRT of 5-FU+CDDP (CDDP group) or 5-FU+CDGP (CDGP group) were analyzed. In both groups, most of the patients were men with a pathological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. A Markov model was used to show the clinical courses of esophageal cancer after the CRT therapy. An outcome used for economic evaluation was life year gained (LYG). We calculated the cost per-effectiveness ratio (CER) and incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Clinical effectiveness and costs in this model were investigated retrospectively, and the costs were estimated from the perspective of the medical institution. Sensitivity analysis was used to check the robustness of this model. RESULTS: In CDDP and CDGP group, LYG was 18.23 and 16.31 years and CER was 270,373 and 406,264 yen/LYG, respectively. As a result, ICER was .883,999 yen/LYG. The sensitivity analysis showed that this model was definitely robust. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that CDDP could prolong LYG with less cost than CDGP and that CRT of 5-FU and CDDP was markedly cost effective treatment.

[Analysis of students, achievement rate and contents of assessment for objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) attempted at the faculty of pharmaceutical sciences, Showa University].

The aim of this study was to analyze students, achievement rate and contents of assessment judged by instructors in objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) attempted at the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Showa University. The OSCE was carried out for fourth-year students in May 28, 2005. In this trial, there were two stations, i.e., counting/measurement dispensing and subsequent audit of dispensed drugs, and 218 students and 31 instructors (as evaluators) participated. We developed a checklist to test students attitudes and skills (two stages) and overall evaluation (five stages). Each student was evaluated by two instructors. Examination time was 8 minutes for drug dispensing, and 4 minutes for the audit of dispensed drug. After the OSCE trial, we analyzed validity of examination time, contents of assessment, and differences in scores between different evaluators. More than half of the students could not finish the examination within the limit of time for dispensing the liquid and cream and audit for dispensed powder. The number of items that 60% of the students achieved was 48 (82.8%). Moreover, 20% of the assessment items did not agree among the evaluators with a disagreement rate of 20% or more. Thus, we distinguished between the items based on the extent of disagreement rates. It was suggested that most of the students achieved such a level to actually perform clinical training in pharmacies. From these results, it is necessary to set up an assignment to finish the within the time limit to extent the time limit depending upon examination contents, to standardize the evaluation to increase the agreement rate among evaluators, and to more clearly identify assessment criteria.