Prognostic evaluation of quick sequential organ failure assessment score in ICU patients with sepsis across different income settings.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence on association between quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and sepsis mortality in ICU patients. The primary aim of this study was to determine the association between qSOFA and 28-day mortality in ICU patients admitted for sepsis. Association of qSOFA with early (3-day), medium (28-day), late (90-day) mortality was assessed in low and lower middle income (LLMIC), upper middle income (UMIC) and high income (HIC) countries/regions. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the MOSAICS II study, an international prospective observational study on sepsis epidemiology in Asian ICUs. Associations between qSOFA at ICU admission and mortality were separately assessed in LLMIC, UMIC and HIC countries/regions. Modified Poisson regression was used to determine the adjusted relative risk (RR) of qSOFA score on mortality at 28 days with adjustments for confounders identified in the MOSAICS II study. RESULTS: Among the MOSAICS II study cohort of 4980 patients, 4826 patients from 343 ICUs and 22 countries were included in this secondary analysis. Higher qSOFA was associated with increasing 28-day mortality, but this was only observed in LLMIC (p < 0.001) and UMIC (p < 0.001) and not HIC (p = 0.220) countries/regions. Similarly, higher 90-day mortality was associated with increased qSOFA in LLMIC (p < 0.001) and UMIC (p < 0.001) only. In contrast, higher 3-day mortality with increasing qSOFA score was observed across all income countries/regions (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that qSOFA remained associated with 28-day mortality (adjusted RR 1.09 (1.00-1.18), p = 0.038) even after adjustments for covariates including APACHE II, SOFA, income country/region and administration of antibiotics within 3 h. CONCLUSIONS: qSOFA was independently associated with 28-day mortality in ICU patients admitted for sepsis. In LLMIC and UMIC countries/regions, qSOFA was associated with early to late mortality but only early mortality in HIC countries/regions.

Unmet Needs and Barriers in Providing Hospital Care for Older Adults: A Qualitative Study Using the Age-Friendly Health System Framework.

Purpose: This study aims to identify unmet needs and barriers for improving inpatient care for older adults at an academic hospital in Korea by using a qualitative focus group design and the Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) framework. Patients and Methods: A total of 14 healthcare providers and employees participated in focus group interviews. Participants included medical doctors, registered nurses, a receptionist, a patient transporter, a pharmacist, a physical therapist, and a social worker. The data were analyzed qualitatively, as per the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. The analysis method encompassed a thematic framework analysis via the AFHS 4Ms framework, consisting of the four domains "What Matters", "Medication", "Mentation", and "Mobility". Results: Multiple barriers and unmet needs were identified using the AFHS 4Ms framework in the provision of inpatient care for older adults at the hospital. The main barriers identified in the "What matters" domain are a lack of shared decision-making and individualized care plans, as well as economic and safety-conscious preferences among some older patients. In the "Medications" domain, the main barriers to providing adequate and safe pharmacotherapy include patient and caregiver-related factors, increased complexity of medication use, and lack of institutional support systems. In the "Mentation" domain, the main issues identified are communication barriers related to patients, caregiver factors, and insufficient delirium management due to a lack of adequate processes/environments such as delirium identification. In the "Mobility" domain, the main challenges include reduced mobility and geriatric complications, unnecessary mobility restrictions, and the increased risk of falls due to lack of resources and environmental factors. Conclusion: The study highlighted the need for improvements in inpatient care for older adults at an academic hospital in Korea. Identified unmet needs and barriers can be used to guide a more patient-centered approaches for an age-friendly inpatient environment.

Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes of Sepsis in ICUs among Countries of Differing National Wealth across Asia.

Rationale: Directly comparative data on sepsis epidemiology and sepsis bundle implementation in countries of differing national wealth remain sparse. Objectives: To evaluate across countries/regions of differing income status in Asia 1) the prevalence, causes, and outcomes of sepsis as a reason for ICU admission and 2) sepsis bundle (antibiotic administration, blood culture, and lactate measurement) compliance and its association with hospital mortality. Methods: A prospective point prevalence study was conducted among 386 adult ICUs from 22 Asian countries/regions. Adult ICU participants admitted for sepsis on four separate days (representing the seasons of 2019) were recruited. Measurements and Main Results: The overall prevalence of sepsis in ICUs was 22.4% (20.9%, 24.5%, and 21.3% in low-income countries/regions [LICs]/lower middle-income countries/regions [LMICs], upper middle-income countries/regions, and high-income countries/regions [HICs], respectively; P < 0.001). Patients were younger and had lower severity of illness in LICs/LMICs. Hospital mortality was 32.6% and marginally significantly higher in LICs/LMICs than HICs on multivariable generalized mixed model analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.37; P = 0.049). Sepsis bundle compliance was 21.5% at 1 hour (26.0%, 22.1%, and 16.2% in LICs/LMICs, upper middle-income countries/regions, and HICs, respectively; P < 0.001) and 36.6% at 3 hours (39.3%, 32.8%, and 38.5%, respectively; P = 0.001). Delaying antibiotic administration beyond 3 hours was the only element independently associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-3.08; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Sepsis is a common cause of admission to Asian ICUs. Mortality remains high and is higher in LICs/LMICs after controlling for confounders. Sepsis bundle compliance remains low. Delaying antibiotic administration beyond 3 hours from diagnosis is associated with increased mortality. Clinical trial registered with www.ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/01/016898).

A combination of early warning score and lactate to predict intensive care unit transfer of inpatients with severe sepsis/septic shock.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The modified early warning score (MEWS) is used to predict patient intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality. Lactate (LA) in the blood lactate (BLA) is measured to evaluate disease severity and treatment efficacy in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. The usefulness of a combination of MEWS and BLA to predict ICU transfer in severe sepsis/septic shock patients is unclear. We evaluated whether use of a combination of MEWS and BLA enhances prediction of ICU transfer and mortality in hospitalized patients with severe sepsis/septic shock. METHODS: Patients with severe sepsis/septic shock who were screened or contacted by a medical emergency team between January 2012 and August 2012 were enrolled at a university-affiliated hospital with ~2,700 beds, including 28 medical ICU beds. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled and the rate of ICU admittance was 38%. MEWS (7.37 vs. 4.85) and BLA concentration (5 mmol/L vs. 2.19 mmol/L) were significantly higher in patients transferred to ICU than those in patients treated in general wards. The combination of MEWS and BLA was more accurate than MEWS alone in terms of ICU transfer (C-statistics: 0.898 vs. 0.816, p = 0.019). The 28-day mortality rate was 19%. MEWS was the only factor significantly associated with 28-day mortality rate (odds ratio, 1.462; 95% confidence interval, 1.122 to 1.905; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MEWS and BLA may enhance prediction of ICU transfer in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.

Prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide with the sequential organ failure assessment score in septic shock.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in combination with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in patients with septic shock at the time of emergency department (ED). METHODS: Study subjects included all consecutive patients with septic shock who were treated with resuscitation bundle therapy between January 2010 and July 2012. SOFA scores and BNP were measured at ED recognition. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare the predictive ability of SOFA score alone and in combination with BNP. RESULTS: A total of 290 patients with septic shock admitted to ED were included. The BNP and SOFA score were higher in nonsurvival group compared with survival group (1,156.0 versus 469.1 pg/mL, P < 0.01; 9.9 versus 8.0, P < 0.01). In the receiver operating characteristic curves for predicting 28-day mortality, the area under the curves of SOFA score combined with BNP was 0.728 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.658-0.798) and SOFA score alone was 0.682 (95% CI: 0.610-0.755). Although the predictive ability of SOFA with BNP was statistically higher than that of SOFA alone (P = 0.02), it could not increase prognostic accuracy clinically significantly. SOFA with BNP was an independent predictor of 28-day mortality (odds ratio: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.15-1.71). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SOFA with BNP at the time of ED presentation may provide superior prognostic accuracy to the patients with septic shock. However, further studies need to validate the prognostic usefulness of SOFA with BNP.

Mortality after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: multicenter analysis in Korea.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate factors associated with the mortality of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the impact of a hospital rapid response system (RRS) on patient mortality in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study was done in 22 ICUs of 15 centers from July 1, 2010, to January 31, 2011. We only enrolled patients admitted to ICUs after in-hospital CPR and divided eligible patients into 2 groups-survivors and nonsurvivors. RESULTS: Among 4617 patients, 150 patients were admitted post-CPR, 76 died, and 74 survived. At 24 hours, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and the best Glasgow Coma Scale were significantly lower in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors. In multivariate analysis, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and presence of lower respiratory infection were both independently associated with mortality. At the first hour after admission, lowest serum potassium and highest heart rate were associated with mortality. At 24 hours after admission, lowest mean arterial pressure, HCO3 level, and venous oxygen saturation level; highest heart rate; and use of vasoactive drugs were associated with mortality. The mortality of patients in hospitals with an RRS was not significantly different from that of hospitals without an RRS. CONCLUSION: Various physiologic and laboratory parameters were associated with the mortality of post-CPR ICU admitted patients, and the presence of an RRS did not reduce mortality of these patients in our study.