Accuracy of ultrasonography in the assessment of liver fat compared with MRI.

AIM: To investigate the accuracy of ultrasonography in the assessment of hepatic steatosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as standard of reference and to explore the influence of additional hepatic iron overload. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 2,783 volunteers (1,442 women, 1,341 men; mean age, 52.3±13.8 years) underwent confounder-corrected chemical-shift-encoded MRI of the liver at 1.5 T. Proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) and transverse relaxation rate (R2*) were calculated to estimate hepatic steatosis and liver iron overload, respectively. In addition, the presence of hepatic steatosis was assessed by B-mode ultrasonography. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of hepatic ultrasonography were determined for different degrees of hepatic steatosis and different amounts of liver iron. RESULTS: MRI revealed hepatic steatosis in 40% of participants (n=1,112), which was mild in 68.9% (n=766), moderate in 26.7% (n=297), and severe in 4.4% (n=49) of patients. Ultrasonography detected hepatic steatosis in 37.8% (n=1,052), corresponding to 74.5% sensitivity and 86.6% specificity. The sensitivity of ultrasound increased with the amount of hepatic fat present and was 65.1%, 95%, and 96% for low, moderate, and high fat content; whereas the specificity was constantly high at 86.6%. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detection of hepatic steatosis did not vary significantly with the amount of liver iron present. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is an excellent tool to assess hepatic steatosis in the clinical setting with some limitations in patients with a low liver fat content. The detection of hepatic steatosis by ultrasonography is not influenced by liver iron.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of trametinib plus dabrafenib as first-line therapy for metastatic BRAF V600-mutated melanoma in the Swiss setting.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with metastatic melanomas that harbour BRAF V600E or V600K mutations with trametinib plus dabrafenib appears to be superior to treatment with vemurafenib alone. This treatment regimen is likely to become available in Switzerland in the near future. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of trametinib plus dabrafenib. METHODS: A Markov cohort simulation was conducted to model the clinical course of typical patients with metastatic melanoma. Information on response rates, clinical condition and follow-up treatments were derived and transition probabilities estimated based on the results of a clinical trial that compared treatment with trametinib plus dabrafenib vs. vemurafenib alone. RESULTS: Treatment with trametinib plus dabrafenib was estimated to cost an additional CHF199 647 (Swiss francs) on average and yield a gain of 0·52 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF385 603 per QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that a willingness-to-pay threshold of CHF100 000 per QALY would not be reached at the current US price of trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of trametinib in Switzerland at US market prices for the treatment of metastatic BRAF V600-mutated melanoma with trametinib plus dabrafenib is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with vemurafenib monotherapy. A reduction in the total price of the combination therapy is required to achieve an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio for this clinically promising treatment.