Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Pancreatology ; 17(3): 497-503, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28411019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To find the appropriate method of pancreatic transection during distal pancreatectomy (DP), we retrospectively compared post-operative complications including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) according to the different types of pancreatic transection. METHODS: This study included 169 patients who underwent pancreatic transection using an ultrasonic activated device (USAD) with transfixion of the pancreatic duct (DP-TF group, n = 89), USAD followed by pancreaticogastrostomy (DP-PG group, n = 44), and a reinforced linear tristapler (DP-ST, n = 36). RESULTS: Overall and POPF-related complications in DP-PG group, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in DP-ST group were significantly lower than DP-TF group. There were no significant difference in overall complication, length of hospitalization and operative costs between DP-PG and DP-ST groups. Operative time was significantly longer in DP-PG group than others. CONCLUSION: Both DP-PG and DP-ST are associated with better surgical outcomes. Regarding ease of surgical technique, shorter operative times, and similar medical costs, DP with a reinforced linear tristapler is a good choice during DP.


Assuntos
Pancreatectomia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Esvaziamento Gástrico , Gastrostomia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/economia , Pancreatopatias/cirurgia , Ductos Pancreáticos/cirurgia , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 401(2): 205-14, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908132

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older patients are considered to have increased risk for complications after major surgery, but age alone is not a reliable predictor of postoperative complications. However, no universal screening test adequately predicts postoperative complications in older patients. This prospective study recorded pertinent baseline geriatric assessment variables to identify risk factors for postoperative complications in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for patients aged ≥70 years who undergo hepatectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 71 consecutive patients ≥70 years of age. Patients had geriatric assessments of baseline and later cognition, nutritional and functional status, and burden of comorbidities, completed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative morbidities were recorded. RESULTS: Postoperative morbidities developed in 18 patients (25 %). Univariate analysis identified serum albumin, operating time and blood loss, cirrhosis, geriatric 8 (G8), and Mini Nutritional Assessment as possible risk factors for postoperative complications, but only G8 < 14 survived multivariate analysis as an independent predictor of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the G8 score, based on patients' nutritional assessments, is a useful screening method for older HCC patients who qualify for elective liver resection. Preoperative G8 scores can help forecast postoperative complications in older HCC patients. Future studies with larger numbers of patients, limited to HCC and liver resections, are needed to verify our results.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Avaliação Geriátrica , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Nutricional , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi ; 116(4): 243-8, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26422887

RESUMO

Pain is a sensation associated with subjective factors, making it difficult to measure and assess. Currently, there is no widely accepted method of objectively assessing pain, and therefore subjective assessments such as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) are generally used. The PainVision system has been developed for the quantitative analysis of pain and comparison of postoperative pain intensity. In this study, we investigated whether postoperative pain could be objectively assessed using this system in digestive tract surgery patients. Pain scores were measured with the VAS, the PainVision system, and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in patients undergoing open or laparoscopic hepatectomy, open or laparoscopic gastrectomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. As measured using the PainVision system, postoperative pain intensity was lower in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery compared with open hepatectomy. In open hepatectomy patients, pain intensity measured by the PainVision system was significantly lower on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 10 than on POD 1. Preemptive use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs significantly reduced postoperative pain in open hepatectomy patients. The results showed that PainVision effectively quantifies pain intensity after digestive tract surgery. Objective assessment of postoperative pain may lead to earlier mobility and improved quality of life.


Assuntos
Trato Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Medição da Dor , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA