Cost-Effectiveness of Metastasis-Directed Therapy in Oligorecurrent Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Oligorecurrent prostate cancer has historically been treated with indefinite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), although many patients and providers opt to defer this treatment at the time of recurrence given quality-of-life and/or comorbidity considerations. Recently, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has emerged as a potential intermediary between surveillance and immediate continuous ADT. Simultaneously, advanced systemic therapy in addition to ADT has also been shown to improve survival in metastatic hormone-sensitive disease. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of treating oligorecurrent patients with upfront MDT before standard-of-care systemic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Markov-based cost-effectiveness analysis was constructed comparing 3 strategies: (1) upfront MDT → salvage abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) + ADT → salvage docetaxel + ADT; (2) upfront AAP + ADT → salvage docetaxel + ADT; and (3) upfront docetaxel + ADT → salvage AAP + ADT. Transition probabilities and utilities were derived from the literature. Using a 10-year time horizon and willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), net monetary benefit values were subsequently calculated for each treatment strategy. RESULTS: At 10 years, the base case revealed a total cost of $141,148, $166,807, and $136,154 with QALYs of 4.63, 4.89, and 4.00, respectively, reflecting a net monetary benefit of $322,240, $322,018, and $263,407 for upfront MDT, upfront AAP + ADT, and upfront docetaxel + ADT, respectively. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation (1,000,000 simulations), upfront MDT was the cost-effective strategy in 53.6% of simulations. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed 95% confidence intervals for cost ($75,914-$179,862, $124,431-$223,892, and $103,298-$180,617) and utility in QALYs (3.85-6.12, 3.91-5.86, and 3.02-5.22) for upfront MDT, upfront AAP + ADT, and upfront docetaxel + ADT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At 10 years, upfront MDT followed by salvage AAP + ADT, is comparably cost-effective compared with upfront standard-of-care systemic therapy and may be considered a viable treatment strategy, especially in patients wishing to defer systemic therapy for quality-of-life or comorbidity concerns. Additional studies are needed to determine whether MDT causes a sustained meaningful delay in disease natural history and whether any benefit exists in combining MDT with upfront advanced systemic therapy.

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Murine Model of Chronic Radiation-Induced Proctitis.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used to treat most pelvic malignancies. While treatment is often effective, curative radiation doses to the rectum can result in chronic radiation-induced proctitis, which is characterized by diarrhea, tenesmus, and/or rectal bleeding, recently termed pelvic radiation disease. An animal model of chronic radiation-induced proctitis would be useful to test both preventative and therapeutic strategies to limit this morbidity but has been elusive because of the high rodent mortality associated with acute bowel RT injury. The objective of this research was to develop a novel mouse model of chronic radiation-induced proctitis using advanced technology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using an X-RAD 225-Cx (Precision X-Ray) small animal irradiator, multiple plan configurations were evaluated for planning treatment volume and organ-at-risk avoidance to deliver a 15 Gy 3D conformal treatment plan. The final plan was verified by high resolution 3D dosimetry (PRESAGE/optical-CT), and delivered using a single arc. Mice were monitored for mortality for 250 days, followed by histopathological correlates including mucicarmine, Masson's trichrome, and fecal pellet length. RESULTS: Six beam arrangements were considered: single and parallel-opposed fields with whole-pelvis coverage, and collimated fields in parallel-opposed, 3-field, 4-field, and arc geometries. A collimated arc plan offered superior planning treatment volume coverage and organ-at-risk avoidance compared to whole-pelvis irradiation. Treatment verification with PRESAGE 3D dosimetry (Heuris Inc) showed >99% of voxels passing gamma analysis with 2%/2 mm criteria. Our treatment resulted in no acute mortality and 40% mortality at 250 days. Histopathological analysis showed increased mucous production and fibrosis of the irradiated colon, but no change in fecal pellet length. CONCLUSIONS: Our model was able to target successfully lower colon and rectum with lower mortality than other published models. This permitted measurement of late effects that recapitulate some features of rectal damage in humans.