An assessment of burden of hospital-acquired pneumonia among abdominal surgical patients in tertiary university hospital in Serbia: A matched nested case-control study.

Background: In the population of abdominal surgical patients hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) significantly increases morbidity and mortality. Patients and methods: Through regular hospital surveillance of patients who received abdominal operations, we identified postoperative HAP from 2007 to 2019. In an initial nested case-control study, every surgical patient with HAP was compared with three control patients without HAP. Control patients were matched to the cases by age, gender, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and type of surgical operation. Also, the patients with HAP, who died were compared with those who survived. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) revealed that other postoperative infections, length of intensive care unit stay, use of H2RA, use of PPI/ H2RA, multiple transfusion, and use of vancomycin in surgical prophylaxis were independent RFs for occurrence of HAP. Also, MLRA identified that age, lenght of hospital stay, use of mechanical ventilation and ceftriaxone in HAP therapy were indepedenttly associated with poor outcome of HAP. All Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were resistant to aminoglycoside antimicrobial agents and showed carbapenem resistance. The most frequently used antibiotics in patients with HAP and without HAP were vancomycin and metronidazole, respectively. Conclusion: Our study provided an insight into the burden of HAP in abdominal surgical patients, and highlighted several priority areas and targets for quality improvement.

Procalcitonin and BISAP score versus C-reactive protein and APACHE II score in early assessment of severity and outcome of acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Early assessment of severity and continuous monitoring of patients are the key factors for adequate treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to determine the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) scoring system as prognostic markers in early stages of AP with comparison to other established indicators such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. METHODS: This prospective study included 51 patients (29 with severe AP). In the first 24 h of admission in all patients the APACHE II score and BISAP score, CRP and PCT serum concentrations were determined. The values of PCT serum concentrations and BISAP score were compared with values of CRP serum concentrations and APACHE II score, in relation to the severity and outcome of the disease. RESULTS: Values of PCT, CRP, BISAP score and APACHE II score, measured at 24 h of admission, were significantly elevated in patients with severe form of the disease. In predicting severity of AP at 24 h of admission, sensitivity and specificity of the BISAP score were 74% and 59%, respectively, APACHE II score 89% and 69%, respectively, CRP 75% and 86%, respectively, and PCT 86% and 63%, respectively. It was found that PCT is highly significant predictor of the disease outcome (p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: In early assessment of AP severity, PCT has better predictive value than CRP, and similar to the APACHE II score. APACHE II score is a stronger predictor of the disease severity than BISAP score. PCT is a good predictor of AP outcome.