Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 172(1): 109-14, 2014 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24485223

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The most common congenital anomaly in adults is secundum, which can be closed using a surgical or transcatheter approach. Despite the growing use of transcatheter ASD closure, few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of this strategy. We sought to compare the long-term cost effectiveness of transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum in adults. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was used with all clinical outcome parameter estimates obtained from the province-wide Québec Congenital Heart Disease Database. Costs were obtained from a single academic centre (Canadian dollars). A cost-effectiveness analysis using a discrete event Monte Carlo simulation model from the perspective of a single third party payer and multiple sensitivity analyses were performed. Patients were followed for a maximum of 5 years after ASD closure. RESULTS: Between l998 and 2005, we identified 718 adults (n=335 transcatheter; n=383 surgical) who underwent ASD closure in Quebec. The 5-year cost of surgical closure was $15,304 SD $4581 versus $11,060 SD $5169 for the transcatheter alternative. At 5 years, transcatheter closure was marginally more effective than surgery (4.683 SD 0.379 life-years versus 4.618 SD 0.638 life-years). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that transcatheter ASD closure was a dominant strategy with an 80% probability of cost savings and equal or greater efficacy compared to surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Although definitive conclusions are limited given the observational nature of the primary data sources, transcatheter ASD closure appeared to be a cost-effective strategy associated with slightly improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs compared to surgical closure at 5-years follow-up.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Comunicação Interatrial/economia , Comunicação Interatrial/cirurgia , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal/economia , Adulto , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarianos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econométricos , Método de Monte Carlo , Quebeque
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 6(5): 497-503, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23602461

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness and long-term safety of transcatheter versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defects (ASD) in adults. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter ASD closure has largely replaced surgery in most industrialized countries, but long-term data comparing the 2 techniques are limited. METHODS: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of all patients, ages 18 to 75 years, who had surgical or transcatheter ASD closure in Québec, Canada's second-largest province, using provincial administrative databases. Primary outcomes were long-term (5-year) reintervention and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were short-term (1-year) onset of congestive heart failure, stroke, or transient ischemic attack, and markers of health service use. RESULTS: Of the 718 ASD closures performed between 1988 and 2005, 383 were surgical and 335 were transcatheter. The long-term reintervention rate was higher in patients with transcatheter ASD closure (7.9% vs. 0.3% at 5 years, p = 0.0038), but the majority of these reinterventions occurred in the first year. Long-term mortality with the transcatheter technique was not inferior to surgical ASD closure (5.3% vs. 6.3% at 5 years, p = 1.00). Secondary outcomes were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter ASD closure is associated with a higher long-term reintervention rate and long-term mortality that is not inferior to surgery. Overall, these data support the current practice of using transcatheter ASD closure in the majority of eligible patients and support the decision to intervene on ASD with significant shunts before symptoms become evident.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Comunicação Interatrial/terapia , Adulto , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Comunicação Interatrial/cirurgia , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Quebeque , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Can J Cardiol ; 27(4): 506-13, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês, Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21546210

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for atrial fibrillation (AF) impose a substantial burden on our health care system, and AF management strategies are increasingly focused on hospitalization reduction. The objectives of this study were to determine the cost of hospitalization for AF and to identify the main determinants of this cost in a Canadian setting. METHODS: Our study population consisted of patients hospitalized for AF and/or atrial flutter at a tertiary care hospital in Canada between April 1, 2001, and March 31, 2007. Patient-level demographics and data on clinical resource use and cost of treatment were collected from a computerized resource use and cost accounting system. The main determinants of in-hospital costs were identified through Bayesian model averaging. RESULTS: Data were collected on 325 consecutive hospitalizations for AF. The median length of stay was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 3-9). The mean cost of an AF admission was CAD$4740 (SD = CAD$4457), and the median was CAD$3532 (IQR, CAD$2013-CAD$5944). Multivariate analysis identified 2 independent predictors of increased cost: CHADS2 score (relative increase in cost: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.33) and warfarin use (relative increase in cost: 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.67). These 2 variables were also independent predictors of increased length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The main clinical determinants of increased cost and increased length of stay were CHADS2 score and warfarin use. Strategies for reducing AF-related costs should focus on preventing hospitalization or decreasing its length in patients with high CHADS2 scores and on finding alternatives to the use of warfarin or using outpatient bridging anticoagulation to facilitate earlier hospital discharge.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/economia , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Flutter Atrial/diagnóstico , Flutter Atrial/economia , Flutter Atrial/terapia , Teorema de Bayes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quebeque
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA