Blood pressure measurement and assessment of arterial structure and function: an expert group position paper.

Measuring blood pressure (BP) and investigating arterial hemodynamics are essential in understanding cardiovascular disease and assessing cardiovascular risk. Several methods are used to measure BP in the doctor's office, at home, or over 24 h under ambulatory conditions. Similarly, several noninvasive methods have been introduced for assessing arterial structure and function; these methods differ for the large arteries, the small ones, and the capillaries. Consequently, when studying arterial hemodynamics, the clinician is faced with a multitude of assessment methods whose technical details, advantages, and limitations are sometimes unclear. Moreover, the conditions and procedures for their optimal implementation, and/or the reference normality values for the parameters they yield are not always taken into sufficient consideration. Therefore, a practice guideline summarizing the main methods and their use in clinical practice is needed. This expert group position paper was developed by an international group of scientists after a two-day meeting during which each of the most used methods and techniques for blood pressure measurement and arterial function and structure evaluation were presented and discussed, focusing on their advantages, limitations, indications, normal values, and their pragmatic clinical application.

Assessment and Management of Patients with Obesity and Hypertension in European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres. A survey from the ESH Working Group on Diabetes and Metabolic Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers are faced with an increasing number of patients with obesity and arterial hypertension. Preventing obesity-associated hypertension and appropriately managing patients with established disease are both important. Hence, the aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical care of patients with obesity and hypertension among ESH Excellence Centres (ECs). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, international 30-item survey through e-mails. RESULTS: In total, 70 representatives of ECs participated (78% men) with 66% of them practicing medicine for more than 30 years and working in well-equipped clinics. Most were internists (41%) and cardiologists (37%) and 73% reported training on the management of obese patients with hypertension. A majority weigh their patients (77%) and evaluate patients for sleep disorders (93%). However, only 47% spend more than 5min to advise for lifestyle modification in general, 59% for weight loss, 56% for salt intake and 64% for exercise. Finally, a minority of participants ask patients if they like their body (6%) or about previous attempts to lose weight (28%), evaluate 24h urinary sodium excretion rate (22%) and provide written (15%) or personalized (10%) dietary advices. If the patient suffers also from type 2 diabetes mellitus, 66% switch treatment to GLP1 receptor agonists and 60% to SGLT2 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Most clinicians in ESH ECs are well educated regarding obesity-associated hypertension, and clinics are sufficiently equipped to manage these patients, as well. However, several deficits were reported regarding efforts to address and implement obesity specific aspects and interventions to improve care in patients with obesity and hypertension.

Hypertension and obesity still remain two of the main cardiovascular risk factors worldwide.There is a need to lower the incidence of obesity-induced hypertension, and to focus on practical guidelines for the evaluation and management of patients with obesity and hypertension.This is a web-based survey to understand the current clinical practices in assessing/managing patients with obesity and hypertension in ESH Excellence Centres.Most clinicians in ESH ECs are well educated regarding obesity-associated hypertension.Clinics are sufficiently equipped to manage these patients.Several deficits were reported regarding efforts to address and implement obesity specific aspects and interventions to improve care in patients with obesity and hypertension.

Arterial stiffness in children and adolescents with masked and sustained hypertension.

This study recruited 85 healthy children and adolescents, aged 6-18 years, from a school-based blood pressure (BP) screening study and performed office BP measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24-h ABPM) and 24-h pulse wave analysis. Prevalence of BP phenotypes was assessed, factors that may predict hypertension (HTN) in ABPM were examined and the effect of BP phenotypes, as well as school, office, and ambulatory BP parameters on pulse wave velocity (PWV), was investigated. Forty-five (54.9%) of the children were normotensives, 8 (9.7%) were white coat hypertensives (WCH), 19 (23.2%) had masked hypertension (MH), and 10 (12.2%) had sustained HTN. Estimated adjusted marginal means for 24-h PWV were 4.79 m/s (95% CI 4.65-4.94) for sustained hypertensives, 4.72 m/s (95% CI 4.62-4.82) for MH, 4.38 m/s (95% CI 4.23-4.54) for WCH, and 4.33 m/s (95% CI 4.26-4.40) for normotensives (sustained hypertensives versus normotensives and WCH, p < 0.001, MH versus normotensives and WCH, p < 0.005). Neither body mass index (BMI) z-score nor school systolic BP (SBP) z-score could predict HTN by ABPM. Office SBP z-score was associated with 1.74 times increased odds ratio to have HTN in ABPM. Sustained HTN and MH were independent predictors of 24-h PWV after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI z-score. In conclusion, arterial stiffness in children and adolescents was assessed by 24-h PWV associates with mean ambulatory BP. Both school and office BP measurements could not predict HTN in ABPM or increasing PWV. HTN in ABPM was independently associated with the risk of higher PWV compared with normotensive and WCH phenotype.

Comparison of the SphygmoCor XCEL device with applanation tonometry for pulse wave velocity and central blood pressure assessment in youth.

BACKGROUND: Vascular phenotype by assessing carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and central SBP (cSP) in the young could be used as an intermediate cardiovascular outcome measure. Tonometry is considered the gold-standard technique, but its use is challenging in clinical practice, especially when used in children. The purpose of this study was to validate cf-PWV and cSP assessment with novel oscillometric device (SphygmoCor XCEL) in children and adolescents. METHODS: cf-PWV and cSP were measured in 72 children and adolescents aged 6-20 years. Measurements were performed by applanation tonometry and by the SphygmoCor XCEL device at the same visit under standardized conditions. Regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots were used for comparison of the tonometer-based with oscillometric-based method. RESULTS: Mean cf-PWV measured by applanation tonometry was 4.85 ±â€Š0.81 m/s and measured by SpygmoCor XCEL was 4.75 ±â€Š0.81 m/s. The mean difference between the two devices was 0.09 ±â€Š0.47 m/s (P = NS). cSP measured by SpygmoCor XCEL was strongly correlated with cSP measured by applanation tonometry (R = 0.87, P < 0.001). Mean cSP measured by applanation tonometry was 103.23 ±â€Š9.43 mmHg and measured by SpygmoCor XCEL was 103.54 ±â€Š8.87 mmHg. The mean cSP difference between the two devices was -0.30 ±â€Š3.34 mmHg (P = NS), and fulfilled the AAMI criterion 1. The estimated intersubject variability was 2.17 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The new oscillometric SphygmoCor XCEL device provides equivalent results for cf-PWV and cSP values to those obtained by tonometry in children and adolescents. Thus, the SphygmoCor XCEL device could be appropriate for assessing cf-PWV and cSP in the pediatric population.

Early Vascular Aging Risk Assessment From Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: The Early Vascular Aging Ambulatory Score.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement methods, office BP, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and home BP, in the identification of early vascular aging (EVA) and developed a score to predict the risk of EVA in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Two-hundred eighty-two consecutive subjects (39.7% male) aged 56.8  ±â€Š 15.8 years were included. Office and out-of-office BP measurements including ABPM on a usual working day and 7 days home BP monitoring were performed. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (c-f PWV) was measured in all patients. EVA was defined as c-f PWV values higher than the expected for age average values according to European population data. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, EVA was significantly correlated with office systolic BP, average 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP, and average 24-hour and office heart rates. The area under the curve for predicting EVA was 0.624 (95% CI 0.551 to 0.697), 0.559 (95% CI 0.484 to 0.635) and 0.565 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.641), for daytime, home, and office systolic BP, respectively. Ambulatory BP variables, age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus (yes/no), and estimated glomerular filtration rate were used to develop a new score for EVA providing a total accuracy of 0.82, 0.84 sensitivity, and 0.78 specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the new risk score, Early Vascular Aging Ambulatory score, may accurately identify hypertensive patients with EVA using ABPM values and classic cardiovascular risk factors.

Target organ damage in "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension".

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigated (i) the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in patients who had never been treated earlier with antihypertensive medication, and (ii) the association of these conditions with target organ damage. METHODS: A total of 1,535 consecutive patients underwent office blood pressure (BP) measurements, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiography, and ultrasonography of the carotid arteries. Subjects who showed normotension or hypertension on the basis of both office and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurement were characterized as having confirmed normotension or confirmed hypertension, respectively. WCH was defined as office hypertension with ambulatory normotension, and MH as office normotension with ambulatory hypertension. RESULTS: WCH was found in 17.9% and MH in 14.5% of the subjects. The prevalence of WCH was significantly higher in subjects with obesity, while the prevalence of MH was significantly higher in normal-weight subjects. The confirmed hypertensive subjects as well as the masked hypertensive subjects had significantly higher left ventricular mass (LVM) (corrected for body surface area) and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) than the confirmed normotensive subjects did (108.9 +/- 30.6, 107.1 +/- 29.1 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2) and 0.68 +/- 0.16, 0.68 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm, respectively, P < 0.005). White coat hypertensive subjects did not have a significantly higher LVM index than confirmed normotensive subjects (101.5 +/- 25.9 vs. 101.4 +/- 29.9 g/m(2)); they tended to have higher cIMT than the confirmed normotensive subjects, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.67 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.15 mm). CONCLUSIONS: WCH and MH are common conditions in patients who visit hypertension outpatient clinics. Confirmed hypertension and MH are accompanied by increased LVM index and cIMT, even after adjusting for other risk factors.