RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The TeleCheck-AF approach is an on-demand mobile health (mHealth) infrastructure incorporating mobile app-based heart rate and rhythm monitoring through teleconsultation. We evaluated feasibility and accuracy of self-reported mHealth-based AF risk factors and CHA2DS2-VASc-score in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients managed within this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients from eight international TeleCheck-AF centers were asked to complete an app-based 10-item questionnaire related to risk factors, associated conditions and CHA2DS2-VASc-score components. Patient's medical history was retrieved from electronic health records (EHR). RESULTS: Among 994 patients, 954 (96%) patients (38% female, median age 65 years) completed the questionnaire and were included in this analysis. The accuracy of self-reported assessment was highest for pacemaker and anticoagulation treatment and lowest for heart failure and arrhythmias. Patients who knew that AF increases the stroke risk, more often had a 100% or ≥80% correlation between EHR- and app-based results compared to those who did not know (27 vs. 14% or 84 vs. 77%, P = 0.001). Thromboembolic events were more often reported in app (vs. EHR) in all countries, whereas higher self-reported hypertension and anticoagulant treatment were observed in Germany and heart failure in the Netherlands. If the app-based questionnaire alone was used for clinical decision-making on anticoagulation initiation, 26% of patients would have been undertreated and 6.1%-overtreated. CONCLUSION: Self-reported mHealth-based assessment of AF risk factors is feasible. It shows high accuracy of pacemaker and anticoagulation treatment, nevertheless, displays limited accuracy for some of the CHA2DS2-VASc-score components. Direct health care professional assessment of risk factors remains indispensable to ensure high quality clinical-decision making.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether higher rates of delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in women might have contributed to the poorer outcome of women. METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic multicenter study, we recruited patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with any kind of chest discomfort/chest pain with onset or peak within the last 12 h. We quantified early diagnostic uncertainty for the presence of ACS among treating physicians at the ED after 90 min, possibly responsible for delayed diagnosis, using a visual analogue scale. Late diagnostic uncertainty, possibly responsible for misdiagnosis, was defined as disagreement among two independent cardiologists' adjudication of the final diagnosis after complete work-up. RESULTS: Among 2795 patients (897 women and 1898 men), ACS was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 24 % of women and 35 % of men. Early diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgment of the ED physician for ACS as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was 0.89 (95 % CI 0.87-0.92) in women and 0.86 (95 % CI 0.85-0.88) in men (p = 0.046). Late diagnostic uncertainty regarding the diagnosis of ACS was 5 % in women and 7 % in men (p = 0.069). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic uncertainty for the presence of ACS in women is not more common as compared to men and does, therefore, not explain the poorer outcome observed in women with ACS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00470587.