Development of an Evidence-Based Risk Assessment Framework.

Assessment of potential human health risks associated with environmental and other agents requires careful evaluation of all available and relevant evidence for the agent of interest, including both data-rich and data-poor agents. With the advent of new approach methodologies in toxicological risk assessment, guidance on integrating evidence from mul-tiple evidence streams is needed to ensure that all available data is given due consideration in both qualitative and quantitative risk assessment. The present report summarizes the discussions among academic, government, and private sector participants from North America and Europe in an international workshop convened to explore the development of an evidence-based risk assessment framework, taking into account all available evidence in an appropriate manner in order to arrive at the best possible characterization of potential human health risks and associated uncertainty. Although consensus among workshop participants was not a specific goal, there was general agreement on the key consider-ations involved in evidence-based risk assessment incorporating 21st century science into human health risk assessment. These considerations have been embodied into an overarching prototype framework for evidence integration that will be explored in more depth in a follow-up meeting.

Developmental neurotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: identifying research needs to support human health risk assessment.

Increasing use of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in consumer products and commercial applications has helped drive a rise in research related to the environmental health and safety (EHS) of these materials. Within the cacophony of information on ENM EHS to date are data indicating that these materials may be neurotoxic in adult animals. Evidence of elevated inflammatory responses, increased oxidative stress levels, alterations in neuronal function, and changes in cell morphology in adult animals suggests that ENM exposure during development could elicit developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), especially considering the greater vulnerability of the developing brain to some toxic insults. In this review, we examine current findings related to developmental neurotoxic effects of ENM in the context of identifying research gaps for future risk assessments. The basic risk assessment paradigm is presented, with an emphasis on problem formulation and assessments of exposure, hazard, and dose response for DNT. Limited evidence suggests that in utero and postpartum exposures are possible, while fewer than 10 animal studies have evaluated DNT, with results indicating changes in synaptic plasticity, gene expression, and neurobehavior. Based on the available information, we use current testing guidelines to highlight research gaps that may inform ENM research efforts to develop data for higher throughput methods and future risk assessments for DNT. Although the available evidence is not strong enough to reach conclusions about DNT risk from ENM exposure, the data indicate that consideration of ENM developmental neurotoxic potential is warranted.

Neuroinflammation and microglia: considerations and approaches for neurotoxicity assessment.

BACKGROUND: The impact of an inflammatory response, as well as interactions between the immune and nervous systems, are rapidly assuming major roles in neurodegenerative disease and injury. However, it is now appreciated that the exact nature of such responses can differ with each type of insult and interaction. More recently, neuroinflammation and the associated cellular response of microglia are being considered for their contribution to neurotoxicity of environmental agents; yet, so far, the inclusion of inflammatory end points into neurotoxicity assessment have relied primarily on relatively limited measures or driven by in vitro models of neurotoxicity. OBJECTIVE: To present background information on relevant biological considerations of neuroinflammation and the microglia response demonstrating the complex integrative nature of these biological processes and raising concern with regards to translation of effects demonstrated in vitro to the in vivo situation. Specific points are addressed that would influence the design and interpretation of neuroinflammation with regards to neurotoxicology assessment. CONCLUSION: There is a complex and dynamic response in the brain to regulate inflammatory processes and maintain a normal homeostatic level. The classification of such responses as beneficial or detrimental is an oversimplification. Neuroinflammation should be considered as a balanced network of processes in which subtle modifications can shift the cells toward disparate outcomes. The tendency to overinterpret data obtained in an isolated culture system should be discouraged. Rather, the use of cross-disciplinary approaches to evaluate several end points should be incorporated into the assessment of inflammatory contributions to the neurotoxicity of environmental exposures.