Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Voice ; 37(2): 289.e15-289.e21, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358294

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to both identify the incidence and clinical presentation of patients presenting with idiopathic vocal fold paralysis (IVFP). Secondarily we aimed to assess the radiographic findings of computed tomography (CT) studies along the course of the vagus and recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN), specifically measuring for potential areas of compression at the skull base and mediastinum. We hypothesized that a proportion of patients diagnosed with IVFP would have significant differences in measurements when compared to age-gender matched controls on CT imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Institutional review board approved retrospective cohort study METHODS: We assessed patients presenting to a tertiary voice care center between 2003 and 2019 with diagnosis of vocal fold paralysis. Data collected includes demographics, clinical exam findings, and CT measurements including dimensions at bilateral jugular foramen, aortopulmonary (AP) window and surrounding vascular structures. Statistical analysis was then performed using Pearson χ2, and Mann Whitney U tests to determine differences variables of interest. RESULTS: A total of 606 patients were reviewed. Of these patients 60 (9.9%) patients were determined to have IVFP. Left-sided VFP was seen more commonly in 78.3% (N = 47) of idiopathic patients. Our IVFP group had an overall higher incidence of cardiovascular disease [OR = 3.378, 95%CI 1.907-5.941, P < 0.001] compared to those with identified causes for paralysis. Specifically, IVFP patients showed a higher incidence of combined cardiovascular co-morbidities (P < 0.001), mitral valve stenosis (P = 0.007), pulmonary hypertension (P < 0.0001) and congestive heart failure (P < 0.001). When evaluating CT imaging, the AP window was mentioned in only 2 (3.3%) of our idiopathic patients CT reports. The IVFP cohort had a lower median AP window volume (P = 0.020) when compared to age-gender matched controls. This significantly smaller AP window volume was also seen when only left sided IVFP compared to both right-sided paralysis (P < 0.001) and age matched control patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The significance of cardiovascular comorbidities combined with findings of statistically narrowed AP window may help provide an explanation of a subset of patients diagnosed with IVFP.


Assuntos
Paralisia das Pregas Vocais , Voz , Humanos , Prega Vocal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos
2.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(7): 802-809, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33242976

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate complication rate and abandonment rate after tracheoesophageal puncture and to assess factors associated with these outcome measures. METHODS: Retrospective review of laryngectomy patients seen at a single academic institution between 1/1/2003 and 12/1/2018. Charts reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor characteristics, surgical data, adjuvant treatment history, and complications related to laryngectomy or tracheoesophageal puncture. Complications were divided into minor and major. RESULTS: A total of 293 laryngectomees met inclusion criteria. Of these, 69 patients (23.5%) underwent tracheoesophageal puncture. Average follow up was 64.6 months (SD 58.3). Overall laryngectomy complication rate was 43.3%. Overall tracheoesophageal puncture complication rate was 73.9%, with 39.1% of patients having major complications and 34.8% having minor complications only. Total abandonment rate for tracheoesophageal puncture was 34.8%. No associations were seen between tracheoesophageal puncture complication or abandonment rates based on age, gender, race, or insurance status. An increased rate of laryngectomy complications was seen after primary tracheoesophageal puncture (76.5% vs 41.3%, P = .005). CONCLUSION: Tracheoesophageal puncture outcomes were similar in patients with varied demographic, medical, and treatment backgrounds. When considering timing, our findings suggest that patients should be counseled on the possibility of increased complication risk after primary tracheoesophageal puncture. In those in whom the surgeon already has concerns about wound healing, it may be prudent to avoid primary tracheoesophageal puncture. The relatively high abandonment rate emphasizes the value of this measure of tracheoesophageal puncture outcome and highlights the need for appropriate patient counseling and prospective studies assessing the decision to abandon.


Assuntos
Laringectomia , Voz Esofágica , Idoso , Esôfago/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Punções/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Traqueia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Voice ; 34(3): 442-446, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30545492

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate otolaryngology residents' level of confidence and understanding in interpreting laryngeal stroboscopy. METHODS: Otolaryngology residents from three residency programs with fellowship-trained laryngologists on faculty were invited to participate. An assessment consisting of a survey and five stroboscopic exams was administered. Each exam consisted of questions on perceptual voice evaluation, laryngoscopic findings, and stroboscopic findings. Scores were compared to answers provided by three fellowship-trained laryngologists. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 47 invited residents (80.8%) enrolled in the study. On a five-point likert scale, residents reported low confidence (median = 2, range = 1-4) in interpreting stroboscopy, regardless of training program (P = 0.81). Mean assessment scores were 56.5% ± 11.9, with scores in perceptual voice evaluation = 68.5% ± 10.6; laryngoscopy = 70.2% ± 12.8; and stroboscopy = 45.3% ± 17.8. Residents performed worse on stroboscopy questions compared to laryngoscopy questions (P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference in scores by postgraduate year (P = 0.03), but not by institution (P = 0.34). A moderately positive correlation between reported level of confidence and overall scores (ρ = .47, P = 0.003) was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Despite didactic and clinical exposure, residents report low confidence in interpreting stroboscopy and scored lower on stroboscopy-specific questions compared to other assessment items. Additional resources and learning opportunities are needed to improve resident confidence and comprehension of stroboscopy.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Internato e Residência , Laringoscopia/educação , Otorrinolaringologistas/educação , Otolaringologia/educação , Estroboscopia , Distúrbios da Voz/diagnóstico , Competência Clínica , Compreensão , Escolaridade , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estados Unidos , Distúrbios da Voz/fisiopatologia , Qualidade da Voz
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA