Health related quality of life after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Recent data identifies extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) as a potential addendum of conventional cardiopulmonary-resuscitation (cCPR) in highly specified circumstances and selected patients. However, consented criteria indicating eCPR are lacking. Therefore we provide first insights into the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of patients treated with eCPR in a real world setting. METHODS: Retrospective single-center experience of 60 consecutive patients treated with eCPR between 01/2014 and 06/2016 providing 1-year survival- and HRQoL data obtained through the Short-Form 36 Survey (SF-36) after refractory out-of-hospital- (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) of presumed cardiac etiology. RESULTS: Resuscitation efforts until initiation of eCPR averaged 66 ±â€¯35 min and 63.3% of the patients suffered from OHCA. Fifty-five (91.7%) of the overall events were witnessed and bystander-CPR was performed in 73.3% (n = 44) of cases. Cause of arrest was dominated by acute myocardial infarction (AMI, 66.7%) and initial rhythm slightly outbalanced by ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT 53.3%). 12-month survival was 31%. Survivors experienced more often bystander-CPR (p = .001) and a shorter duration of cCPR (p = .002). While mid-term survivors' perceived HRQoL was compromised compared to controls (p ≦ .0001 for PF, RP, RE and BP; p = .007 for GH; p = .016 for SF; p = .030 for MH; p = .108 for VT), scores however resembled HRQoL of subjects on hemodialysis, following cardiogenic shock or pulmonary failure treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). CONCLUSIONS: While HRQoL scores of our survivors ranged markedly below controls, compared to patients on chronic hemodialysis, following ECMO for cardiogenic shock or pulmonary failure most of the discrepancies ameliorated. Thus, successfull eCPR in properly selected patients does translate into an encouraging HRQoL approximating chronic renal failure.

[Mitral valve interventions: Where do we stand?]. / Mitralklappeninterventionen : Wo stehen wir?

Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) with resulting heart failure is one of the most prevalent types of valvular heart disease. Currently, various approaches to catheter-based therapy of MR are already available for patients deemed to be at high-risk for surgery. Most experience has been gained with the MitraClip® system. Technological developments in the field of catheter-based treatment of MR is advancing at a rapid pace, with treatment modalities suited for patients with both primary and secondary MR. Annuloplasty is the surgical gold standard, particularly for patients with secondary MR. For catheter-based therapy of secondary MR a distinction is made between indirect and direct annuloplasty, with the latter most closely corresponding to surgical ring implantation. Catheter-based mitral valve replacement is technically feasible at present; however, experience is still limited and only few reports have been published. Technological development is markedly slower than in the field of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, predominantly owing to the far more complex structure of the mitral valve. Positive experience has already been gained with catheter-based implantation of prostheses designed for the aortic valve into degenerated mitral valve bioprostheses and failed surgical mitral annuloplasty rings (valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring implantation). Further approaches to catheter-based treatment of MR in high-risk surgical patients are expected in the future.