Economic impact on direct healthcare costs of missing opportunities for diagnosing HIV within healthcare settings.

BACKGROUND: The economic consequences of a missed opportunity for HIV testing at an earlier stage of infection within a healthcare setting are poorly described. METHODS: For all newly diagnosed HIV patients followed at the Southern Alberta HIV/AIDS Clinic (SAC), Calgary, Canada, between 1 April 2011 and 1 April 2016, all clinical encounters occurring < 3 years prior to diagnosis within the region were obtained. The direct costs of HIV care after diagnosis to 31 March 2019 were determined from a payers' perspective and reported as mean cost per patient per month (PPPM) in 2019 Canadian dollars (CDN$). Patients with no encounters for 3 years prior to diagnosis were compared with patients with encounters, with special attention to patients with HIV clinical indicator conditions (HCICs). RESULTS: Of 388 patients, 60% had one or more prior encounter without HIV testing; 14% had been treated for an HCIC. Females, older patients and heterosexuals were more likely to have prior encounters. At diagnosis, patients with previous encounters presented with lower CD4 counts and higher rates of AIDS. The mean PPPM costs for patients with any prior encounter or for an HCIC-based encounter were 16% and 33% higher, respectively, than for patients with no prior encounters. While mean PPPM costs for antiretroviral drugs and outpatient visits were slightly higher, in-patient costs were 10 times higher for people with HIV who had a previous HCIC encounter vs. those with no encounters (CDN$316 vs. $31, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Any healthcare visit, especially for an HCIC, represents relatively easy opportunities for HIV testing. Not testing can result in poorer health and higher costs. Targeted clinical testing and novel interventions to correct overlooked testing opportunities within healthcare settings may be an easy way to implement cost savings.

Updated direct costs of medical care for HIV-infected patients within a regional population from 2006 to 2017.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to reappraise the precise costs of HIV care and cost drivers, to determine the optimal tools for modelling costs for HIV care, and to understand the implications of changing medical management of HIV-infected patients for both subsequent outcomes and health care budgets. METHODS: We obtained all drug, laboratory, out-patient and in-patient care costs for all HIV-infected patients followed between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2017 (2017 Cdn$). Mean cost per patient per month (PPPM) was used as the standard comparator value. Patients were stratified based on CD4 count: (1) ≤ 75, (2) 76-200, (3) 201-500 and (4) > 500 cells/µL. We determined the cost for only HIV-related expenses. We compared current costs with costs previously reported for the same population. RESULTS: The number of HIV-infected patients in care doubled from 2006 to 2017; total costs increased from $12.4 to $30.1 million, with antiretroviral (ARV) drugs accounting for 78.8% of costs by 2017. Out-patient/laboratory costs declined from 12% to 8.5%, while in-patient costs exhibited more annual variation. Mean PPPM costs increased from $1316 in 2006 to $1712 in 2014, declining to $1446 in 2017. Higher PPPM costs were associated with CD4 counts < 200 cells/µL. Costs have shifted. While the cost of ARV drugs increased by 32%, the costs of out-patient and in-patient services decreased by 80% and 71%, respectively. Most of the decrease for in-patient costs was attributable to a substantial decrease in HIV-related hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) provides immense benefits, it is not inexpensive. ARV drugs remain the largest cost driver. Hospital costs have remained low. Substantial costs of lifelong ART necessitate innovative, locally applicable strategies for ARV selection and use.

De-simplifying single-tablet antiretroviral treatments: uptake, risks and cost savings.

OBJECTIVES: As more HIV-positive individuals receive antiretroviral therapy (ART), payers are seeking options for covering these increased and sustained drug costs. Strategic use of available generic antiretroviral (ARV) formulations may be feasible. De-simplifying a single-tablet co-formulation (STF) into two or more tablets using both brand and generic drugs has been proposed. We determine if voluntary de-simplification of one STF could be utilized as a cost-saving strategy. We report on the challenges, uptake, outcomes and cost savings of this initiative. METHODS: Patients stable on the most commonly used STF (Triumeq® ) were offered the option of remaining on Triumeq® or switching to generic abacavir/lamivudine and Tivicay® between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2018; those starting ART consisting of abacavir/lamivudine/doulutegravir in the same period were offered the option of starting Triumeq® or generic abacavir/laminvudine and Tivicay® . No incentives were provided. We examined the acceptance/decline rates, patient satisfaction, health care outcomes and annual cost savings. RESULTS: Of 626 patients receiving Triumeq® , 321 were approached; 177 (55.1%) agreed to de-simplify. Of patients initiating ART, 62.7% chose the generic co-formulation. Patients switching to or starting on the generic co-formulation were more likely to be male, > 45 years old, Caucasian, men who have sex with men (MSM) and more HIV-experienced, and to have more comorbidities (all P < 0.05). Preference for STF was cited for declining de-simplification. No concern about generic ARVs was expressed. The rate of viral load > 500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL after baseline was 2.7% in switched patients compared with 7.0% in those declining to switch. No de novo resistance occurred. A saving of Cdn$1 319 686 was achieved in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on altruism, while respecting patient autonomy, achieved de-simplification in > 50% of patients approached, and generated immediate cost savings with no increased risk of adverse events, viral breakthrough or resistance.

Patient perspectives on de-simplifying their single-tablet co-formulated antiretroviral therapy for societal cost savings.

OBJECTIVES: The incremental costs of expanding antiretroviral (ARV) drug treatment to all HIV-infected patients are substantial, so cost-saving initiatives are important. Our objectives were to determine the acceptability and financial impact of de-simplifying (i.e. switching) more expensive single-tablet formulations (STFs) to less expensive generic-based multi-tablet components. We determined physician and patient perceptions and acceptance of STF de-simplification within the context of a publicly funded ARV budget. METHODS: Programme costs were calculated for patients on ARVs followed at the Southern Alberta Clinic, Canada during 2016 (Cdn$). We focused on patients receiving Triumeq® and determined the savings if patients de-simplified to eligible generic co-formulations. We surveyed all prescribing physicians and a convenience sample of patients taking Triumeq® to see if, for budgetary purposes, they felt that de-simplification would be acceptable. RESULTS: Of 1780 patients receiving ARVs, 62% (n = 1038) were on STF; 58% (n = 607) of patients on STF were on Triumeq®. The total annual cost of ARVs was $26 222 760. The cost for Triumeq® was $8 292 600. If every patient on Triumeq® switched to generic abacavir/lamivudine and Tivicay® (dolutegravir), total costs would decrease by $4 325 040. All physicians (n = 13) felt that de-simplifying could be safely achieved. Forty-eight per cent of 221 patients surveyed were agreeable to de-simplifying for altruistic reasons, 27% said no, and 25% said maybe. CONCLUSIONS: De-simplifying Triumeq® generates large cost savings. Additional savings could be achieved by de-simplifying other STFs. Both physicians and patients agreed that selective de-simplification was acceptable; however, it may not be acceptable to every patient. Monitoring the medical and cost impacts of de-simplification strategies seems warranted.

Increased costs of HIV care associated with aging in an HIV-infected population.

OBJECTIVES: Improved survival has shifted the HIV epidemic in the developed world towards more individuals >50 years of age. Older individuals, with new or longstanding HIV infection, are at greater risk for HIV-related and non-HIV-related conditions, compounding the burden and complexity of HIV management. The aim of the study was to examine the impact of age on the cost of HIV care in a well-defined HIV-infected population. METHODS: All HIV-infected individuals >16 years old receiving HIV care between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2011 were included in the study. The costs of antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-related out-patient care and HIV-related in-patient care were collected using mean cost per person, per month (PPPM) as the comparator variable for the comparison between older (>50 years old) and younger (≤ 50 years old) patients. RESULTS: The proportion of older patients increased from 9.6% to 25.4% and proportional costs increased from 25% to 31% from 1999 to 2010. Older patients were more likely than younger patients to be on ART (89% vs. 69%, respectively; P<0.01) and to have AIDS (29% vs. 20%, respectively; P<0.05) but had similar median CD4 counts (404 vs. 396 cells/µL, respectively; not significant). They incurred higher costs for all aspects of HIV care throughout the entire 12 years. By 2010, the mean PPPM cost of HIV care for longstanding older patients was $1325 compared with $1075 for younger patients. More expensive ART as a consequence of more complex regimens, more comorbid interactions and greater adherence accounted for most of the cost difference. CONCLUSIONS: The aging of the HIV-infected population in care is leading to increased HIV care costs. Health care planners and funding agencies need to be aware of the impact of this important shift in HIV demographics on the overall costs of HIV care.

Cost of medical care for HIV-infected patients within a regional population from 1997 to 2006.

OBJECTIVES: To report on the cost of medical care for HIV-infected patients stratified by CD4 cell count for a regional population over a 9-year period, and to examine the effect of reporting costs of HIV care only or only in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced patients. METHODS: Retrospective costing analysis on all HIV-infected patients within the Southern Alberta Cohort from April 1997 to April 2006. Costs for all drugs (ART/non-ART), in-patient (HIV/non-HIV) and out-patient care were obtained from primary sources. Costs were aggregated by patient's CD4 cell count and ART exposure and presented as mean cost per patient per month (PPPM) in 2006 Canadian dollars. RESULTS: The number of patients and annual costs increased by 74% and 69%, respectively. Overall mean PPPM costs increased slightly from $1082 in 1997/1998 to $1159 in 2005/2006. PPPM costs for patients with CD4 counts < or =75 cells/microL increased from $1595 to $2687 while costs for CD4 counts >500, 201-500 and 76-200 cells/microL remained relatively stable at $979, $1057 and $1294, respectively. In-patient hospitalization costs account for most of the cost increases. Reporting costs using only ART-experienced patients would overestimate total costs by 2-9%. Costs for only HIV care were 10-24% lower than total care costs. CONCLUSIONS: Care costs have remained relatively stable for most HIV patients except those with CD4 counts < or =75 cells/microL. Expensive new antiretroviral drugs have had, at present, a minimal cost impact. Enhanced testing to achieve earlier diagnosis and initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy could potentially reduce costs of late presentation and in-patient care.

Longitudinal assessment (1995-2003) of hospitalizations of HIV-infected patients within a geographical population in Canada.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of and reasons for hospitalization of adult HIV-infected patients compared with the general population. METHODS: Length of stay, primary/secondary diagnoses and discharge status were reviewed for all HIV-infected patients admitted to Calgary-area hospitals between 1995 and 2003. Admissions were classified as HIV- or non-HIV-related using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revisions (ICD-9/10) codes and confirmed by chart review. Summary comparative data on admissions for the general population were obtained from the regional administrative database. RESULTS: HIV-infected adults were hospitalized more than twice as frequently, experienced longer stays (median length 5 vs 3 days, respectively) and had higher in-hospital mortality rates (9.1 vs 1.3 per 100 admissions, respectively) than the general population (P < 0.01). Hospitalizations of HIV-infected patients declined by 58% from 1995 to 2003. Patients newly diagnosed with HIV infection accounted for 15% of all HIV-related hospitalizations. HIV-related admissions for known HIV-infected patients decreased from 12 per 100 patient-years-followed in 1995 to 3 per 100 patient-years-followed in 2003. Low CD4 counts, AIDS, and no current use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were strongly correlated with hospitalizations (P < 0.01). Non-HIV-related hospitalizations for HIV-infected patients increased by 42% and were associated with comorbidities (e.g. substance use and psychological disorders). CONCLUSION: Despite the reduction in HIV-related hospitalizations following the introduction of HAART, all-cause hospitalization rates have increased and have started to erode this benefit.

Socio-economic factors and health-related quality of life in adults living with HIV.

This study examined the relationships of income, employment status and other socioeconomic characteristics with dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for those living with HIV/AIDS, controlling for clinical characteristics. Demographic (gender, age, education, living with a partner, HIV transmission category), economic (employment status, monthly household income, volunteer experience), clinical (CD4 count, AIDS defining illness, time since diagnosis, number of HIV symptoms, and highly active antiretroviral therapy), and HRQOL measures (five Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey subscales) were obtained from 308 consenting HIV clinic patients in Calgary, Canada. Multiple regression results indicate that the strongest predictor of the five QL subscales is employment status, while income was significant as an independent predictor in two of the models. Other socioeconomic characteristics were not consistently significant predictors of HRQOL subscales. The contribution of employment to HRQOL is important to explore further, and suggest the need for flexibility in income support and return-to-work programmes for those with HIV.

The high cost of medical care for patients who present late (CD4 <200 cells/microL) with HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the direct costs of medical care in the year following HIV diagnosis for patients who present with a CD4 count <200 cells/microL ('late presenters') and those who present with a CD4 count >200 cells/microL ('early presenters'). METHODS: Direct costs (i.e. drugs, laboratory tests, outpatient care, in-patient care, and home care) for the 12 months following HIV diagnosis, sociodemographic data and clinical data were collected for all patients presenting for HIV care in Southern Alberta, Canada between April 1996 and April 2001. Mean costs are presented as costs in 2001 Canadian dollars. RESULTS: Thirty-nine per cent of 241 patients presented with a CD4 count <200 cells/microL. The mean costs for late presenters were more than twice as high as those for early presenters (i.e. $18,448 vs. $8455, respectively). Late presenters were more likely to be older, male and black, and to have a risk activity of men having sex with men (MSM) or heterosexual contact (P<0.05). However, the large difference in mean costs cannot be attributed to differences in characteristics. When characteristics were statistically held constant, the estimated excess cost of late presentation was almost unaffected, at $9723 (z=5.6). Repeating the analysis using disaggregated costing categories suggested that the difference in total costs was largely attributable to differences in HIV-related hospital care costs, which were 15 times higher for late presenters. CONCLUSIONS: Direct care costs in the year following HIV diagnosis were more than 200% higher for patients who presented late. This difference could not be attributed to differences in patient characteristics. Most costs were attributable to HIV-related hospital care costs and the immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy. While early diagnosis in those at risk for HIV remains medically important, the short-term economic impact is also substantial.