[Diagnostic knee arthroscopy under local anesthesia in hospital. An assessment of the diagnostic reliability, course of the treatment and health care costs]. / Diagnostisk knaeartroskopi i lokalbedøvelse på sygehus. En vurdering af den diagnostiske sikkerhed, behandlingsforløbet og sundhedsvaesenets økonomi.

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient knee arthroscopy under local analgesia can be performed solely as a diagnostic procedure. The aim was to estimate the diagnostic precision of such arthroscopy as compared to the diagnosis made during a secondary therapeutic operation, and to describe the flow of patients and the costs of this treatment strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The records of 371 consecutive patients, who had a diagnostic knee arthroscopy performed under local analgesia, were reviewed retrospectively. The diagnosis made during the diagnostic arthroscopy (371 patients) and a later therapeutic operation (135 patients) were extracted and the patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire. RESULTS: The diagnostic arthroscopy could not be completed in 11 cases. No further operation was necessary in 188 patients. A secondary therapeutic operation was performed in 135 patients. In only 54% of these was the same diagnosis made during the diagnostic and the therapeutic operations. Only half of the 278 patients (75%) who returned the questionnaire, found that the diagnostic procedure had been pain free. DISCUSSION: With respect to the costs, the diagnostic arthroscopy cannot be recommended. Most economic was the strategy in which the diagnostic and therapeutic operations were performed together as an outpatient procedure. The relatively poor diagnostic precision of arthroscopy is surprising and should be kept in mind when patients continue to have unexplained complaints in the knee, despite a normal arthroscopy.

Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish the intraobserver and interobserver variability in the assessment of histologic type (tubular, villous, and tubulovillous) and grade of cytologic dysplasia (mild, moderate, and severe) in colorectal adenomas. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven slides of adenomas were assessed twice by three experienced pathologists, with an interval of two months. Results were analyzed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: For agreement between first and second assessment (both type and grade of dysplasia), kappa values for the three specialists were 0.5345, 0.9022, and 0.4100, respectively. Agreement was better for type than for dysplasia. The strength of agreement was moderate for Observers A and C and almost perfect for Observer B. Agreement between all three observers was seen in 35.2 percent for both type and dysplasia in 61 percent for type and in 47.8 percent for dysplasia. The kappa values for Observer A vs. B and Observer C vs. B were 0.3480 and 0.3770, respectively (both type and dysplasia). Values for type were better than for dysplasia, but agreement was only fair to moderate. CONCLUSION: The interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect, but the intraobserver agreement was only fair to moderate. A simpler classification system or a centralization of assessments would probably increase kappa values.

Should probenecid be used to reduce the dicloxacillin dosage in orthopaedic infections? A study of the dicloxacillin-saving effect of probenecid.

Reduction in the dosage of dicloxacillin from 500 mg to 250 mg 3 times a day would mean lowering of costs and less side-effects in orthopaedic infections. In this cross-over study, the serum concentrations of dicloxacillin were measured in 9 patients after administration of dicloxacillin 500 mg 3 times a day (dicloxacillin 500 mg) and after co-administration of 250 mg dicloxacillin and 250 mg probenecid 3 times per day (dicloxacillin 250 mg+probenecid 250 mg). Concentrations were measured every hour after the tablet intake. The mean maximum serum concentrations of dicloxacillin were 17.1 micrograms/ml (dicloxacillin 500 mg) and 12.2 micrograms/ml (dicloxacillin 250 mg+probenecid 250 mg), respectively (P < 0.05). Serum concentrations above 3 micrograms/ml were obtained during 285 min. in both regimes, but the individual variations were biggest during in the dicloxacillin 250 mg+probenecid 250 mg treatment. Serum concentrations above 5 micrograms/ml were in mean measured during 228 min. (dicloxacillin 500 mg) and 190 min. (dicloxacillin 250 mg+probenecid 250 mg), respectively (P < 0.05). The clinical significance of these findings is being discussed. In theory, treatment with dicloxacillin 250 mg+probenecid 250 mg may be as sufficient as dicloxacillin 500 mg.