The assisting hand assessment for children and youth with brachial plexus birth injury: a study of validity and item hierarchy of AHA-Plex.

OBJECTIVE: Functional assessments that focus on activity performance and that produce valid outcome measures for people with brachial plexus birth injury are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to re-evaluate the internal scale validity of the Assisting Hand Assessment specifically for children and adolescents with brachial plexus birth injury. Two further aims were investigating whether the scale could be shortened for this group while maintaining psychometric quality, and exploring and presenting its item difficulty hierarchy. DESIGN: A cross-sectional psychometric study. SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of 105 children and adolescents (aged 18 months to 18 years, mean 6 years, 7 months, standard deviation (SD) 4 years, 4 months) from Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands with brachial plexus birth injury. METHODS: Participants were assessed with the Assisting Hand Assessment. Data were analysed with Rasch measurement analysis. RESULTS: The 20 Assisting Hand Assessment items together measured a unidimensional construct with high reliability (0.97) and the 4-level rating scale functioned well. Item reduction resulted in 15 items with good item fit, unidimensionality, reliability and acceptable targeting. CONCLUSION: Assisting Hand Assessment for people with brachial plexus birth injury, called AHA-Plex, has 15 items and good internal scale validity. A unique item hierarchy for people with brachial plexus birth injury is presented.

External validity of the Both Hands Assessment for evaluating bimanual performance in children with bilateral cerebral palsy.

AIM: To investigate the external validity of the Both Hands Assessment (BoHA), a new test evaluating bimanual performance in children with bilateral cerebral palsy (CP), by analysing its relationship to established measurements of hand function and self-care skills. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited children with bilateral CP and manual ability corresponding to Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I to III attending three habilitation units in Norway. All participants completed the BoHA. Unimanual capacity was assessed using the Bimanual Fine Motor Function (BFMF) classification, the Box and Block Test (BBT), and the Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2). Self-care skills were assessed with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). RESULTS: Thirty-nine children (19 males, 20 females; mean age 8y 2mo, SD 2y 8mo; age range 2y 8mo-12y 6mo) were included. Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) suggested high correlation between the BoHA and MACS (p=0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.94), BFMF classification (p=0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.91), and BBT for the non-dominant (p=0.85; 95% CI 0.68-0.95) and dominant hand (p=0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.85). The Spearman's ρ between the BoHA and the MA2 subscales varied between 0.48 and 0.83, while the PEDI's ρ was 0.51 (95% CI 0.33-0.67). INTERPRETATION: The BoHA provides valid measures of hand use as suggested by its high correlation with other activity-based measures of hand function.

Interrater and test-retest reliability of the Hand Assessment for Infants.

AIM: To evaluate the interrater and test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and the smallest detectable difference (SDD) of the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI). METHOD: HAI assessments of 55 infants (26 females, 29 males), 25 with clinical signs of unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) and 30 typically developing (mean [SD] age 6.8mo [2.4], range 3-11mo), were scored individually by three therapists. Three clinically experienced occupational therapists (OT 1-OT 3) with extensive experience in using the HAI, independently scored the video recorded HAI play sessions. Analysis of the combined group of infants and just the infants with clinical signs of unilateral CP (12 females, 13 males; mean age 7.6mo [2.1]) were conducted. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, 2.1), Bland-Altman plots, SEM, and SDD were calculated. RESULTS: Interrater and test-retest reliability were excellent for the Both Hands Measure (BoHM) and the Each Hand Sum score (EaHS), with ICCs of 0.96 to 0.99. For individual items, the interrater and test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.81-0.99). The SDD for the EaHS was 2 points, and for the BoHM the SDD it was 3 HAI units for infants with signs of unilateral CP. INTERPRETATION: The HAI results showed good to excellent reliability. The SDDs were low, indicating that results beyond these levels exceed the measurement error and, thus, can be considered true changes. What this study adds The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) shows excellent reliability. A change of ≥3 HAI units is considered a true change. The HAI yields reliable measures for research and clinical practice.

Predictive validity of the Hand Assessment for Infants in infants at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy.

AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) in identifying infants at risk of being diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP), and to determine cut-off values for this purpose. METHOD: A convenience sample of 203 infants (106 females, 97 males) was assessed by the HAI at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Cut-off values were derived for different ages. The clinical outcome (unilateral CP yes/no) at 24 months or more served as an external criterion to investigate the predictive validity of HAI. RESULTS: Half of the infants developed unilateral CP. The area under the curve ranged from 0.77 (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.63-0.91) to 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-1.00) across HAI scales and age intervals. Likewise, sensitivity ranged from 63% to 93%, specificity from 62% to 91%, and accuracy from 73% to 94%. INTERPRETATION: HAI scores demonstrated overall accuracy that ranged from very good to excellent in predicting unilateral CP in infants at risk aged between 3.5 and 12 months. This accuracy increased with age at assessment and the earliest possible prediction was at 3.5 months of age, when appropriate HAI cut-off values for different ages were applied. What this paper adds The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) predicts unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) with high accuracy. HAI cut-off values can guide clinical practice for early identification and diagnosis of unilateral CP.

Hand Assessment for Infants: normative reference values.

AIM: To create normative reference values for unilateral and bilateral use of the hands, using the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI), a newly developed criterion-referenced assessment measuring hand use in infants aged 3 months to 12 months at risk of cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: In total, 489 HAI assessments of typically developing infants (243 females, 246 males), aged 3 months to 10 months (mean 6mo 14d [SD 2mo 5d]), were collected in Italy and Sweden. Normative growth curves based on mean and SDs were created, as well as skill acquisition curves for each test item. Correlation to age and differences between groups based on sex and nationality, as well as differences between the right and the left hand, were investigated. RESULTS: The growth curves showed a steady increase in mean value and a decrease in SD over age. There were no differences between groups based on sex or nationality. There was a negligible mean difference (0.1 raw score) between the right and left hands. INTERPRETATION: HAI normative reference values are now available, which can assist in identifying deviating hand use for each month of age, as well as a side difference between hands in infants at risk of CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) result greater than 2SD below the mean indicates atypical hand use. Skill acquisition curves describe the age at which typically developing infants master the HAI items. Most typically developing infants do not demonstrate asymmetry in hand use.

EVALUACIÓN DE LA FUNCIÓN DE LA MANO PARA BEBÉS (HAI): VALORES NORMATIVOS DE REFERENCIA: OBJETIVO: Para crear valores de referencia normativos para el uso unilateral y bilateral de las manos, utilizando la Evaluación de la Mano para Infantes (HAI), una evaluación recientemente desarrollada basada en criterios que mide el uso de las manos en lactantes de 3 a 12 meses con riesgo de parálisis cerebral (PC). MÉTODO: En total, se recolectaron 489 evaluaciones usando el HAI de bebés con desarrollo típico (243 femeninos, 246 masculinos), de 3 a 10 meses (media 6 meses 14 días [DS 2 meses 5 días]), en Italia y Suecia. Se crearon curvas de crecimiento normativas basadas en la media y las desviaciones estándar, así como curvas de adquisición de habilidades para cada elemento de prueba. Se investigó la correlación con la edad y las diferencias entre grupos según el sexo y la nacionalidad, así como las diferencias entre la mano derecha y la mano izquierda. RESULTADOS: Las curvas de crecimiento mostraron un aumento constante en el valor medio y una disminución en el DE a lo largo de la edad. No hubo diferencias entre grupos por sexo o nacionalidad. Hubo una diferencia de medias insignificante (puntaje bruto de 0,1) entre las manos derecha e izquierda. INTERPRETACIÓN: Este estudio aporta los valores de referencia normativos de HAI, los cuales están disponibles, lo que puede ayudar a identificar la función de las manos que se desvía de los parámetros considerados como normales para cada mes de edad, así como una diferencia lateral entre las manos de los bebés en riesgo de PC.

AVALIAÇÃO DA MÃO PARA LACTENTES (AML): VALORES NORMATIVOS DE REFERÊNCIA: OBJETIVO: Criar valores normativos de referência para uso unilateral e bilateral das mãos, usando a Avaliação da mão para lactentes (AML), uma avaliação baseada em critérios que foi desenvolvida recentemente para mensurar o uso da mão em lactentes de 3 a 12 anos em risco para paralisia cerebral (PC). MÉTODO: No total, 489 avaliações da AML de lactentes com desenvolvimento típico (243 do sexo feminino, 246 do sexo masculino), com idades de 3 a 10 meses (média 6m 14d [DP 2m 5]), foram coletadas na Itália e na Suécia. Curvas normativas de crescimento baseadas em médias e desvios padrão foram criadas, assim como curvas de aquisição de habilidades para cada item do teste. Correlação com a idade e diferenças entre grupos baseadas no sexo e na nacionalidade, assim como diferenças entre mão direita e esquerda, foram investigadas. RESULTADOS As curvas de crescimento mostraram aumento contínuo na média e diminuição no DP com a idade. Não houve diferenças enter grupos com base no sexo ou nacionalidade. Houve uma diferença média inexpressiva (0,1 escore bruto) entre mãos direita e esquerda. INTERPRETAÇÃO: Valores normativos de referência da AML agora estão disponíveis, o que pode ajudar a identificar o uso anormal da mão para cada mês de vida, assim como diferenças entre lados em lactentes em risco para PC.

Development of the assisting hand assessment for adults following stroke: a Rasch-built bimanual performance measure.

AIMS: To describe the development of a new test of bimanual performance for adults following Stroke, the Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke, and to report the evidence of internal and external validity. METHODS: Scale development included: (i) establishing the test situation; (ii) constructing test items; (iii) evaluating internal construct validity by use of Rasch measurement analysis on 144 assessments of adults with hemiparesis, mean age 53 years (SD11.45); and (iv) investigating external validity by correlation to the Jebsen and Taylor Test of Hand Function and the ABILHAND Stroke. RESULTS: The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke scale, scored on 19 items using a four-point rating scale, provided a valid measure of bimanual performance. The rating scale structure, goodness of fit, and principal component analysis demonstrated evidence of a unidimensional construct. The strong reliability and high person separation ratio indicated high probability for the scale to be responsive to change. Correlation to outcomes of the Jebsen and Taylor Test of Hand Function and the ABILHAND Stroke indicated strong external validity. CONCLUSION: Using two hands together is a critical aspect for performance of most daily life tasks. However, assessments of hand function commonly focus on measuring aspects of unimanual function. The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke has the potential to contribute new and clinically important knowledge to stroke rehabilitation by providing an observation-based valid functional measure of bimanual performance. Implications for rehabilitation Hand function assessments commonly focus on unimanual aspects, although the use of two hands together is critical to perform most daily life tasks. The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke measures how effectively a patient with a hemiparesis uses his/her affected hand together with the unaffected hand to perform bimanual tasks. The Adult-Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke contributes a new and clinically important aspect to stroke rehabilitation by providing a valid bimanual observation-based measure to guide intervention and measure change over time.

The Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke: Psychometric Properties of an Observation-Based Bimanual Upper Limb Performance Measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate interrater and intrarater reliability, measurement error, and convergent and discriminative validity of the Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke (Ad-AHA Stroke). DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: A total of 7 stroke rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Stroke survivors (reliability sample: n=30; validity sample: N=118) were included (median age 67y; interquartile range [IQR], 59-76); median time poststroke 81 days (IQR 57-117). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ad-AHA Stroke, Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA). The Ad-AHA Stroke is an observation-based instrument assessing the effectiveness of the spontaneous use of the affected hand when performing bimanual activities in adults poststroke. Reliability of Ad-AHA Stroke was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland-Altman plots, and weighted kappa statistics for reliability on item level. SEM was calculated based on Ad-AHA units. Convergent validity was assessed by calculating Spearman rank correlation coefficients between Ad-AHA Stroke and ARA test and UE-FMA. Comparison of Ad-AHA Stroke scores between subgroups of patients according to hand dominance, neglect, and age evaluated discriminative validity. RESULTS: Intrarater and interrater agreement showed an ICC of 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.99-0.99), an SEM of 2.15 and 1.64 out of 100, respectively, and weighted kappa for item scores were all above 0.79. The relation between Ad-AHA and other clinical assessments was strong (ρ=0.9). Patients with neglect had significantly lower Ad-AHA scores compared to patients without neglect (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: The Ad-AHA Stroke captures actual bimanual performance. Therefore, it provides an additional aspect of upper limb assessment with good to excellent reliability and low SEM for patients with subacute stroke. High convergent validity with the ARA test and UE-FMA and discriminative validity were supported.

Development and Validation of the Both Hands Assessment for Children With Bilateral Cerebral Palsy.

AIMS: To develop a hand function test for children with bilateral cerebral palsy (CP) measuring bimanual performance, including quantification of possible asymmetry of hand use. METHOD: The Both Hands Assessment (BoHA) content was developed through adaptation of the Assisting Hand Assessment (version 5.0). Data from 171 children with bilateral CP, 22-months to 13 years olds (75 females; mean age: 6 years and 6 months) classified at Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III, was entered into Rasch measurement model analyses to evaluate internal scale validity and aspects of reliability. RESULTS: Sixteen items (11 unimanual and 5 bimanual) exhibited evidence for good internal scale validity and item and person reliability when analyzed separately for children with asymmetric or symmetric hand use. By calibrating the BoHA logit measures into the same frame of reference through linking, the overall measure of bimanual performance is comparable between children with asymmetric or symmetric hand use, still allowing use of separate item difficulty hierarchies. CONCLUSIONS: The Both Hands Assessment (BoHA), showed strong evidence of internal construct validity for measuring effectiveness of bimanual performance and the extent of asymmetric hand use in children with bilateral cerebral palsy, MACS levels I-III.

Development of the Hand Assessment for Infants: evidence of internal scale validity.

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a descriptive and evaluative assessment of upper limb function for infants aged 3 to 12 months and to investigate its internal scale validity for use with infants at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy. METHOD: The concepts of the test items and scoring criteria were developed. Internal scale validity and aspects of reliability were investigated on the basis of 156 assessments of infants at 3 to 12 months corrected age (mean 7.2mo, SD 2.5) with signs of asymmetric hand use. Rasch measurement model analysis and non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS: The new test, the Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI), consists of 12 unimanual and five bimanual items, each scored on a 3-point rating scale. It demonstrated a unidimensional construct and good fit to the Rasch model requirements. The excellent person reliability enabled person separation to six significant ability strata. The HAI produced an interval-level measure of bilateral hand use as well as unimanual scores of each hand, allowing a quantification of possible asymmetry expressed as an asymmetry index. INTERPRETATION: The HAI can be considered a valid assessment tool for measuring bilateral hand use and quantifying side difference between hands among infants at risk of developing unilateral cerebral palsy. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The Hand Assessment for Infants (HAI) measures the use of both hands and quantifies a possible asymmetry of hand use. HAI is valid for infants at 3 to 12 months corrected age at risk of unilateral cerebral palsy.

Reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment in adolescents.

AIM: To investigate the interrater and test-retest reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment in adolescents (Ad-AHA) with cerebral palsy (CP) and to evaluate the alternate-form reliability of different test activities. METHOD: Participants were 112 adolescents with unilateral CP (60 males, 52 females; mean age 14y 5mo [standard deviation {SD} 2y 8mo], Manual Ability Classification System levels I-III). Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), smallest detectable change (SDC), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: ICCs for interrater (n=38) and test-retest reliability (n=31) were excellent: 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) respectively. The alternate-form reliability of different test activities was excellent for children (age 10-12y, n=30) performing the School-Kids AHA and Ad-AHA Board Game 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) and for adolescents (age 13-18y) performing the Ad-AHA Board Game compared to the Ad-AHA Present (n=28) 0.99 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), or the Ad-AHA Sandwich (n=29) 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99) tasks. SDC for test-retest was 4.5 AHA-units. INTERPRETATION: Ad-AHA scores are consistent across different raters and occasions. The good alternate-form reliability indicates that the different test activities can be used interchangeably in adolescents with unilateral CP. Differences greater than or equal to 5 AHA-units can be considered a change beyond measurement error. The use of logit based AHA-units makes change comparable for persons at different ability levels.

Development of the Assisting Hand Assessment for adolescents (Ad-AHA) and validation of the AHA from 18 months to 18 years.

AIM: To develop and evaluate a test activity from which bimanual performance in adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) can be observed and scored with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), and to evaluate the construct validity of the AHA test items for the extended age range 18 months to 18 years. METHOD: A new test activity was developed and evaluated for its ability to elicit bimanual actions in adolescents with (n=20) and without (n=10) unilateral CP. The AHA scores of 126 adolescents (mean age 14y 3mo, SD 2y 6mo; 71 males, 55 females) and 157 children with unilateral CP (mean age 6y 1mo, SD 2y 10mo; 102 males, 55 females) were analysed using the Rasch measurement model. RESULTS: The test activity elicited bimanual actions in 100% of typically developing adolescents and in 96.8% and 57.9% of adolescents with unilateral CP (moderately and severely limited hand function respectively). The scale demonstrated good construct validity; thus the same scoring criteria can be used for the age range studied. INTERPRETATION: The new Assisting Hand Assessment for adolescents (Ad-AHA) activity is valid for use with 13- to 18-year-olds to elicit bimanual performance in adolescents with unilateral CP. The same AHA scoring criteria can be used both for children and for adolescents within the age range 18 months to 18 years.

Psychometric properties of a revised version of the Assisting Hand Assessment (Kids-AHA 5.0).

AIM: The aim of this study was to scrutinize the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) version 4.4 for possible improvements and to evaluate the psychometric properties regarding internal scale validity and aspects of reliability of a revised version of the AHA. METHOD: In collaboration with experts, scoring criteria were changed for four items, and one fully new item was constructed. Twenty-two original, one new, and four revised items were scored for 164 assessments of children with unilateral cerebral palsy aged 18 months to 12 years. Rasch measurement analysis was used to evaluate internal scale validity by exploring rating-scale functioning, item and person goodness-of-fit, and principal component analysis. Targeting and scale reliability were also evaluated. RESULTS: After removal of misfitting items, a 20-item scale showed satisfactory goodness-of-fit. Unidimensionality was confirmed by principal component analysis. The rating scale functioned well for the 20 items, and the item difficulty was well suited to the ability level of the sample. The person reliability coefficient was 0.98, indicating high separation ability of the scale. A conversion table of AHA scores between the previous version (4.4) and the new version (5.0) was constructed. INTERPRETATION: The new, 20-item version of the Kids-AHA (version 5.0), demonstrated excellent internal scale validity, suggesting improved responsiveness to changes and shortened scoring time. For comparison of scores from version 4.4 to 5.0, a transformation table is presented.

Guidelines for future research in constraint-induced movement therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy: an expert consensus.

AIM: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of what is known about constraintinduced movement therapy (CIMT) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP), to identify current knowledge gaps, and to provide suggestions for future research. METHOD: Nine experts participated in a consensus meeting. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and data were summarized before the meeting. The core model produced by the European network for Health Technology Assessment was used as a framework for discussion and to identify critical issues for future research. RESULTS: All models of CIMT have demonstrated improvements in the upper limb abilities of children with unilateral CP. A consensus was reached on 11 important questions to be further explored in future studies. The areas of highest priority included the effect of dosage, the effect of repeated CIMT, and the impact of predictive factors, such as age, on the response to CIMT. Consensus suggestions for future study designs and the use of validated outcome measures were also provided. INTERPRETATION: The CIMT construct is complex, and much remains unknown. It is unclear whether a specific model of CIMT demonstrates superiority over others and whether dosage of training matters. Future research should build upon existing knowledge and aim to provide information that will help implement CIMT in various countries with different healthcare resources and organizational structures.

Development of the Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment: evidence for content and internal scale validity.

AIM: To describe the development of the Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment (Mini-AHA) for children with signs of unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) aged 8 to 18 months, and evaluate aspects of content and internal scale validity. METHOD: The ability of the video-recorded Mini-AHA play session to provoke bimanual performance in children with unilateral CP and typical development was evaluated. Original AHA test items were examined for their suitability for younger children and possible new items were generated. Data from 108 assessments of children with unilateral CP (86 children, 53 males, 33 females; mean age 13 mo, SD 3 mo, range 8-18 mo) were entered into a Rasch measurement model analysis to evaluate internal scale validity. A Spearman's correlation analysis explored the relationship between age and ability measures for children with unilateral CP. The frequency of maximum scores in 40 children with typical development (22 males, 18 females; mean age 12 mo, SD 3 mo) was examined. RESULTS: The Mini-AHA play session provoked bimanual responses in typically developing children 99% of the time. Person and item fit criteria established 20 items for the scale. The resultant unidimensional scale also demonstrated excellent discriminative features through high separation reliability. The item calibration values covered the range of person ability measures well. Age was not related to the ability measures for children with unilateral CP (rs =0.178). All children with typical development achieved maximum scores. INTERPRETATION: Accumulated evidence shows that the Mini-AHA validly measures use of the affected hand during bimanual performance for children with unilateral CP aged 8 to 18 months. The Mini-AHA has the potential to be a useful assessment to evaluate functional hand use and the effects of intervention in an age group when potential for change is high.

Cultural validity of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment/Preferences for Activities of Children (CAPE/PAC).

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate whether the activity items of the Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment/Preferences for Activities of Children (CAPE/PAC) were relevant for Swedish children. SUBJECTS: A total of 337 typically developed children aged 6-17 years old. METHODS: The CAPE/PAC was translated into Swedish in accordance with accepted translation procedures. By means of 14 group interviews with children with and without disabilities aged 6-15 years old and parents, available leisure activities were listed. These were matched to the items in the CAPE/PAC. Sixteen new potential activities were added and tested on 337 typical developed children from different regions of Sweden. A cutoff level of activities performed by >10% was set to identify relevant activities. Differences between the original and a proposed Swedish version were analysed using paired-samples t-tests of standardized mean scores. RESULTS: Three new activity items were included, for 10 items new activity examples were added, and three not relevant items were excluded. In the Swedish version the outcome of standardized mean diversity score was significantly higher compared with the outcome of the original version. CONCLUSIONS: When using instruments in new contexts, it is not enough simply to translate; validation of the item relevance to the new context is essential.

Are there cross-cultural differences of ADL ability in children measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)?

INTRODUCTION: In many studies of self-care assessments for children, cultural differences in age-norm values have been shown. No study has evaluated whether there are cross-cultural differences in ADL motor and/or process skills in children when measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). AIM: To investigate if there were systematic differences in ADL ability measured with the AMPS between children from the Nordic countries and North America and to evaluate the applicability of the existing international age-normative values for children from these two regions. METHODS: Values from a total of 4 613 children, 3-15 years old, without known disabilities, from these geographical regions were compared with ANOVA. The difference in logits between each region and the mean values for each age group were calculated. RESULTS: No differences of relevance in age-related ADL ability measures between children from the two geographical regions were found, and the age-norm values are applicable to both regions. IMPLICATIONS: The AMPS may be considered free from cultural bias and useful in both clinical practice and research concerned with children in both the Nordic countries and North America.

Test-retest and alternate forms reliability of the assisting hand assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) has earlier demonstrated excellent validity and rater reliability. This study aimed to evaluate test-retest reliability of the AHA and alternate forms reliability between Small kids vs School kids AHA and the 2 board games in School kids AHA. DESIGN: Test-retest and alternate forms reliability was evaluated by repeated testing with 2 weeks interval. SUBJECTS: Fifty-five children with unilateral cerebral palsy, age range 2 years and 3 months to 11 years and 2 months. METHODS: Intraclass correlation coefficients and smallest detectable difference were calculated. Common item and common person linking plots using Rasch analysis and Bland-Altman plots were created. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest was 0.99. Alternate forms intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.99 between Small kids and School kids AHA and 0.98 between board games. Smallest detectable difference was 3.89 points (sum scores). Items in common item linking plots and persons in common person linking plots were within 95% confidence intervals, indicating equivalence across test forms. CONCLUSION: The AHA has excellent test-retest and alternate forms reliability. A change of 4 points or more between test occasions represents a significant change. Different forms of the AHA give equivalent results.

The Assisting Hand Assessment: current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change.

The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) provides a new perspective of hand function evaluation relevant for children with unilateral upper limb disabilities. It measures how effectively the involved hand is actually used for bimanual activity, which, for these children, might be the most important aspect of their hand function. The aim of this paper is to report the conceptual framework and the evidence for validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change for the measures. Previously, the AHA has been evaluated for children aged 18 months to 5 years and excellent inter- and intrarater reliability was demonstrated. This paper reports further evidence of construct validity and reliability for the AHA measures involving an extended age range of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy or obstetric brachial plexus palsy from 18 months to 12 years of age (mean age 4y 11mo [SD 2y 9mo] range 18mo-12y 8mo). A Rasch measurement model was used to analyze 409 assessments from 303 children (170 males, 133 females). The analysis generated a scale demonstrating large capacity to reliably separate and spread personal ability measures, indicating sensitivity to change and a hierarchy of the items ranging them from easy to hard. Aspects of item fit, relationship between age and ability measures, and development of assisting hand function are discussed.

Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate interrater and intrarater reliability for the Assisting Hand Assessment. METHOD: For interrater reliability, two designs were used: 2 occupational therapists rated the same 18 children, and 20 occupational therapists rated the same 8 children. For intrarater reliability, 20 raters each rated one child twice. Both English and Swedish versions of the instrument were used. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. RESULTS: ICCs for the sum score for the interrater were 0.98 (two raters) and 0.97 (20 raters) and for the intrarater 0.99. SEM was 1.5 for interrater and 1.2 for the intrarater study, which gave an error interval of +/-3 raw scores for interrater and +/- 2.4 raw scores for intrarater. CONCLUSION: This study shows excellent interrater and intrarater reliability for sum scores.