Proton versus photon craniospinal irradiation for adult medulloblastoma: A dosimetric, toxicity, and exploratory cost analysis.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) decreased the dose to normal tissue and resulted in less toxicity than photon CSI for adult patients. Methods: This single-institution retrospective analyzed differences in radiation doses, acute toxicity, and cost between proton and CSI for adult medulloblastoma patients. Results: Of 39 total patients, 20 were treated with photon CSI prior to 2015, and 19 were treated with proton CSI thereafter. Median age was 28 years (range 18-66). The molecular subtype was most commonly sonic hedgehog (68%). Patients most commonly received 36 Gy CSI in 20 fractions with a boost to 54-55.8 Gy (92%). Proton CSI delivered significantly lower mean doses to cochleae, lacrimal glands, lens, parotid glands, pharyngeal constrictors, esophagus, lungs, liver, and skin (all P < .001). Patients receiving proton CSI had significantly lower rates of acute dysphagia of any grade (5% versus 35%, P = .044) and decreased median weight loss during radiation (+1.0 versus -2.8 kg, P = .011). Weight loss was associated with acute hospitalization (P = .009). Median follow-up was 2.9 and 12.9 years for proton and photon patients, respectively, limiting late toxicity and outcome comparisons. At the last follow-up, 5 photon patients had died (2 of progressive disease, 3 without recurrence ages 41-63) and 21% had experienced major cardiovascular events. At 10 years, 89% were alive and 82% were recurrence free. Conclusions: This study demonstrates dosimetric improvements with proton CSI, potentially leading to decreased acute toxicity including dysphagia and weight loss during treatment.

Design and characterization of an aperture system and spot configuration for ocular treatments with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proton therapy is a key modality used in the treatment of ocular melanoma. Traditionally ocular sites are treated using a dedicated eyeline with a passively scattered proton beam and a brass aperture. This work aims to design and characterize a beam-collimating aperture to treat ocular targets with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam. METHODS: A plastic aperture system that slides into the gantry nozzle of a spot scanning proton beam was designed and constructed. It consists of an intermediate scraper layer to attenuate stray protons and a 3D-printed patient-specific aperture positioned 5.7 cm from the surface of the eye. The aperture system was modeled in TOPAS and Monte Carlo simulations were validated with film measurements. Two different spot configurations were investigated for treatment planning and characterized based on lateral penumbra, central axis (CAX) dose and relative efficiency. Alignment and leakage were investigated through experimental film measurements. Range was verified using a multi-layer ionization chamber. Reference dose measurements were made with a PinPoint 3D ion chamber. Neutron dose was evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Aperture alignment with radiation isocenter was determined to be within 0.31 mm at a gantry angle of 0°. A single-spot configuration with a 10 mm diameter aperture yielded film-measured lateral penumbras of 1 mm to 1.25 mm, depending on depth in the spread-out Bragg peak. TOPAS simulations found that a single spot configuration results in a flat dose distribution for a 10 mm diameter aperture and provides a CAX dose of less than 106% for apertures less than 14 mm in diameter. For larger targets, adding four corner spots to fill in the dose distribution is beneficial. Trade-offs between lateral penumbra, CAX dose and relative efficiency were characterized for different spot configurations and can be used for future clinical decision-making. The aperture was experimentally determined to not affect proton beam range, and no concerning leakage radiation or neutron dose was identified. Reference dose measurements with a PinPoint ion chamber were within 2.1% of Monte Carlo calculated doses. CONCLUSION: The aperture system developed in this work provides a method of treating ocular sites on a gantry-based spot scanning proton system. Additional work to develop compatible gaze tracking and gating infrastructure is ongoing.

Optimizing normal tissue sparing in ion therapy using calculated isoeffective dose for ion selection.

PURPOSE: To investigate how the selection of ion type affects the calculated isoeffective dose to the surrounding normal tissue as a function of both normal tissue and target tissue α/ß ratios. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A microdosimetric biologic dose model was incorporated into a Geant4 simulation of parallel opposed beams of protons, helium, lithium, beryllium, carbon, and neon ions. The beams were constructed to give a homogeneous isoeffective dose to a volume in the center of a water phantom for target tissues covering a range of cobalt equivalent α/ß ratios of 1-20 Gy. Concomitant normal tissue isoeffective doses in the plateau of the ion beam were then compared for different ions across the range of normal tissue and target tissue radiosensitivities for a fixed isoeffective dose to the target tissue. RESULTS: The ion type yielding the optimal normal tissue sparing was highly dependent on the α/ß ratio of both the normal and the target tissue. For carbon ions, the calculated isoeffective dose to normal tissue at a 5-cm depth varied by almost a factor of 5, depending on the α/ß ratios of the normal and target tissue. This ranges from a factor of 2 less than the isoeffective dose of a similar proton treatment to a factor of 2 greater. CONCLUSIONS: No single ion is optimal for all treatment scenarios. The heavier ions are superior in cases in which the α/ß ratio of the target tissue is low and the α/ß ratio of normal tissue is high, and protons are superior in the opposite circumstances. Lithium and beryllium appear to offer dose advantages similar to carbon, with a considerably lower normal tissue dose when the α/ß ratio in the target tissue is high and the α/ß ratio in the normal tissue is low.