Radiologic Assessment of Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review on the Use, Reliability, and Accuracy of Current Fusion Criteria.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar interbody fusion (IF) is a common procedure to fuse the anterior spine. However, a lack of consensus on image-based fusion assessment limits the validity and comparison of IF studies. This systematic review aims to (1) report on IF assessment strategies and definitions and (2) summarize available literature on the diagnostic reliability and accuracy of these assessments. METHODS: Two searches were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Search 1 identified studies on adult lumbar IF that provided a detailed description of image-based fusion assessment. Search 2 analyzed studies on the reliability of specific fusion criteria/classifications and the accuracy assessed with surgical exploration. RESULTS: A total of 442 studies were included for search 1 and 8 studies for search 2. Fusion assessment throughout the literature was highly variable. Eighteen definitions and more than 250 unique fusion assessment methods were identified. The criteria that showed most consistent use were continuity of bony bridging, radiolucency around the cage, and angular motion <5°. However, reliability and accuracy studies were scarce. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the challenges in reaching consensus on IF assessment. The variability in IF assessment is very high, which limits the translatability of studies. Accuracy studies are needed to guide innovations of assessment. Future IF assessment strategies should focus on the standardization of computed tomography-based continuity of bony bridging. Knowledge from preclinical and imaging studies can add valuable information to this ongoing discussion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Assessment of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review of Imaging-Based Fusion Criteria.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive assessment of osseous fusion after spinal fusion surgery is essential for timely diagnosis of patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis and for evaluation of the performance of spinal fusion procedures. There is, however, no consensus on the definition and assessment of successful posterolateral fusion (PLF) of the lumbar spine. This systematic review aimed to (1) summarize the criteria used for imaging-based fusion assessment after instrumented PLF and (2) evaluate their diagnostic accuracy and reliability. METHODS: First, a search of the literature was conducted in November 2018 to identify reproducible criteria for imaging-based fusion assessment after primary instrumented PLF between T10 and S1 in adult patients, and to determine their frequency of use. A second search in July 2021 was directed at primary studies on the diagnostic accuracy (with surgical exploration as the reference) and/or reliability (interobserver and intraobserver agreement) of these criteria. Article selection and data extraction were performed by at least 2 reviewers independently. The methodological quality of validation studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) and QAREL (Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies). RESULTS: Of the 187 articles included from the first search, 47% used a classification system and 63% used ≥1 descriptive criterion related to osseous bridging (104 articles), absence of motion (78 articles), and/or absence of static signs of nonunion (39 articles). A great variation in terminology, cutoff values, and assessed anatomical locations was observed. While the use of computed tomography (CT) increased over time, radiographs remained predominant. The second search yielded 11 articles with considerable variation in outcomes and quality concerns. Agreement between imaging-based assessment and surgical exploration with regard to demonstration of fusion ranged between 55% and 80%, while reliability ranged from poor to excellent. CONCLUSIONS: None of the available criteria for noninvasive assessment of fusion status after instrumented PLF were demonstrated to have both sufficient accuracy and reliability. Further elaboration and validation of a well-defined systematic CT-based assessment method that allows grading of the intertransverse and interfacet fusion mass at each side of each fusion level and includes signs of nonunion is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Changes in the Position of the Junctional Vertebrae After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Implication in Risk Assessment of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Development.

BACKGROUND: The development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a major problem. Changes in the global sagittal parameters as they relate to PJK have been reported after surgery, however, the relationships between the changes in the upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) during and after surgery as they relate to development of PJK have not been quantified. We hypothesize that the compensatory changes in the unfused segments of the spine over time are correlated with the surgically induced changes in the UIV position. METHODS: Sixty adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (with at least 1-year follow-up) who underwent posterior spinal surgery were included retrospectively. Global spinal parameters were calculated using 3-dimensional models of the spine, additional parameters [proximal junctional kyphosis angle (PJKA), cervical lordosis angle] were measured manually before surgery and at 3 postoperative follow-ups. The 3-dimensional position of the vertebral body centroids was calculated for T1, UIV, and lower-instrumented vertebra at all timepoints. The sagittal position of T1, UIV, and lower-instrumented vertebra were correlated to the cervical lordosis, PJKA, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt. RESULTS: The position of T1 and UIV were significantly more anterior at first erect for patients who developed PJK. The posterior shift of UIV at the most recent follow-up as compared with the preoperative position was significant in both the PJK and non-PJK cohort. A larger anterior shift in UIV at first erect correlated with a larger T1 and UIV posterior shift at the most recent follow-up. At the most recent follow-up, a more posterior position of the UIV correlated with a larger angle of PJKA (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Both a larger anterior shift of UIV between preoperative and first erect and a more posterior position of UIV at the most recent follow-up was correlated with a higher PJKA. A larger anterior shift in the position of the UIV after surgery was associated with a higher posterior shift of UIV at the last follow-up. The surgically induced changes in the UIV are an important parameter associated with the development of PJK. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.