RESUMO
Quadruple perovskites with high magnetic transition temperatures are an interesting class of compounds but are synthesized typically under high pressure. Ambient pressure synthesis of new multinary quadruple perovskites having a high global instability index (GII) and transition temperature can be interesting for future exploration of high-TC oxides. A new A- and B-site ordered multinary quadruple perovskite, LaCu3Fe2RuSbO12, is synthesized by conventional solid-state reactions at ambient pressure. Rietveld structure refinement revealed that the compound crystallizes in the Pn3Ì space group with a lattice parameter of 7.4556(4) Å. The compound showed complete 1 : 3 ordering of La and Cu at the A-site and 1 : 1 rock-salt ordering of Fe with Ru/Sb at the B-site. The compound is also probed with scanning and transmission electron microscopy and XPS to investigate the chemical composition, microstructure, lattice and oxidation states of the elements. Magnetic studies revealed antiferromagnetic (AFM) correlations with magnetic ordering transitions at â¼170 and 40 K. Furthermore, the M-H hysteretic behavior at 100 and 5 K indicated ferrimagnetism due to short-range AFM interactions among Fe3+(3d5) and Ru4+(4d4) spins involving Cu2+(↑)-Fe3+(↓)-Ru4+(↑) triads. The specific heat data reaffirmed the magnetic signatures while electrical transport showed semiconducting behavior with variable range hopping. The details of synthesis and structural and compositional studies along with the magnetic and electrical transport properties of LaCu3Fe2RuSbO12 are reported in this paper.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Survival outcomes for multiple myeloma have improved dramatically since the introduction of novel therapeutic agents. While these drugs are highly effective in improving survival outcomes and quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma, they come at a significant cost. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of bortezomib-based triplet or quadruplet drug regimens in isolation and followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the Indian context. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to assess the health and economic outcomes of novel drug regimens with and without AHSCT for the treatment of NDMM in India. We estimated the lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs in each scenario. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed and compared against the current willingness-to-pay threshold of a one-time per capita gross domestic product of â¹146,890 (US$1,927.70) for India. Parameter uncertainty was assessed through Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Among seven treatment sequences, the VCd (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone) alone arm has the lowest cost and health benefits as compared to four treatment sequences, namely VTd (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) alone, VRd (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) alone, VRd plus AHSCT and DVRd (Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) plus AHSCT. It was found that VTd plus AHSCT and VCd plus AHSCT arms were extendedly dominated (ED) by combination of two alternative treatments. Among the five non-dominated strategies, VRd has a lowest incremental cost of â¹ 2,20,093 (US$2,888) per QALY gained compared to VTd alone followed by VRd plus AHSCT [â¹3,14,530 (US$4,128) per QALY gained] in comparison to VRd alone. None of the novel treatment sequences were found to be cost-effective at the current WTP threshold of â¹1,46,890 (US$1,927.7). CONCLUSION: At the current WTP threshold of one-time per capita GDP (â¹ 146,890) of India, VRd alone and VRd plus AHSCT has 38.1% and 6.9% probability to be cost-effective, respectively. Reduction in current reimbursement rates of novel drugs, namely VRd, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone under national insurance program and societal cost of transplant by 50%, would make VRd plus AHSCT and VTd plus AHSCT cost-effective at an incremental cost of â¹40,671 (US$34) and â¹97,639 (US$1,281) per QALY gained, respectively.
Assuntos
Bortezomib , Análise Custo-Benefício , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Cadeias de Markov , Mieloma Múltiplo , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Índia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/economia , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/economia , Talidomida/economia , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos MonoclonaisRESUMO
There are disparities in outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated the influence of sociodemographic factors on global disparities in outcomes for patients with MM. This rapid evidence assessment (PROSPERO, CRD42021248461) followed PRISMA-P guidelines and used the PICOS framework. PubMed and Embase® were searched for articles in English from 2011 to 2021. The title, abstract, and full text of articles were screened according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. The sociodemographic factors assessed were age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. Outcomes were diagnosis, access to treatment, and patient outcomes. Of 84 articles included, 48 were US-based. Worldwide, increasing age and low socioeconomic status were associated with worse patient outcomes. In the US, men typically had worse outcomes than women, although women had poorer access to treatment, as did Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients. No consistent disparities due to sex were seen outside the US, and for most factors and outcomes, no consistent disparities could be identified globally. Too few studies examined disparities in diagnosis to draw firm conclusions. This first systematic analysis of health disparities in patients with MM identified specific populations affected, highlighting a need for additional research focused on assessing patterns, trends, and underlying drivers of disparities in MM.
Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Mieloma Múltiplo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Metanálise como Assunto , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/etnologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Background: The rising economic burden of cancer on patients is an important determinant of access to treatment initiation and adherence in India. Several publicly financed health insurance (PFHI) schemes have been launched in India, with treatment for cancer as an explicit inclusion in the health benefit packages (HBPs). Although, financial toxicity is widely acknowledged to be a potential consequence of costly cancer treatment, little is known about its prevalence and determinants among the Indian population. There is a need to determine the optimal strategy for clinicians and cancer care centers to address the issue of high costs of care in order to minimize the financial toxicity, promote access to high value care and reduce health disparities. Methods: A total of 12,148 cancer patients were recruited at seven purposively selected cancer centres in India, to assess the out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) and financial toxicity among cancer patients. Mean OOPE incurred for outpatient treatment and hospitalization, was estimated by cancer site, stage, type of treatment and socio-demographic characteristics. Economic impact of cancer care on household financial risk protection was assessed using standard indicators of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) and impoverishment, along with the determinants using logistic regression. Results: Mean direct OOPE per outpatient consultation and per episode of hospitalization was estimated as â¹8,053 (US$ 101) and â¹39,085 (US$ 492) respectively. Per patient annual direct OOPE incurred on cancer treatment was estimated as â¹331,177 (US$ 4,171). Diagnostics (36.4%) and medicines (45%) are major contributors of OOPE for outpatient treatment and hospitalization, respectively. The overall prevalence of CHE and impoverishment was higher among patients seeking outpatient treatment (80.4% and 67%, respectively) than hospitalization (29.8% and 17.2%, respectively). The odds of incurring CHE was 7.4 times higher among poorer patients [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 7.414] than richest. Enrolment in PM-JAY (CHE AOR = 0.426, and impoverishment AOR = 0.395) or a state sponsored scheme (CHE AOR = 0.304 and impoverishment AOR = 0.371) resulted in a significant reduction in CHE and impoverishment for an episode of hospitalization. The prevalence of CHE and impoverishment was significantly higher with hospitalization in private hospitals and longer duration of hospital stay (p < 0.001). The extent of CHE and impoverishment due to direct costs incurred on outpatient treatment increased from 83% to 99.7% and, 63.9% to 97.1% after considering both direct and indirect costs borne by the patient and caregivers, respectively. In case of hospitalization, the extent of CHE increased from 23.6% (direct cost) to 59.4% (direct+ indirect costs) and impoverishment increased from 14.1% (direct cost) to 27% due to both direct and indirect cost of cancer treatment. Conclusion: There is high economic burden on patients and their families due to cancer treatment. The increase in population and cancer services coverage of PFHI schemes, creating prepayment mechanisms like E-RUPI for outpatient diagnostic and staging services, and strengthening public hospitals can potentially reduce the financial burden among cancer patients in India. The disaggregated OOPE estimates could be useful input for future health technology analyses to determine cost-effective treatment strategies.
Assuntos
Estresse Financeiro , Neoplasias , Humanos , Hospitalização , Gastos em Saúde , Seguro Saúde , Características da Família , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMO
Background: Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of these drugs is from high-income countries, which has limited generalisability for low-income and middle-income counties. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic regimens, chlorambucil plus prednisolone (CP), bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib for CLL treatment in India. Methods: A Markov model was developed for estimating lifetime costs and consequences in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 CLL patients following treatment with different therapeutic regimens. The analysis was performed based on a limited societal perspective, 3% discount rate and lifetime horizon. The clinical effectiveness of each regime in the form of progression-free survival and occurrence of adverse events were assessed from various randomised controlled trials. A structured comprehensive review of literature was undertaken for the identification of relevant trials. The data on utility values and out of pocket expenditure was obtained from primary data collected from 242 CLL patients across six large cancer hospitals in India. Findings: As compared to the most affordable regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy, none of the other therapeutic regimens were cost-effective at one time per capita gross-domestic product of India. However, if the current price of either combination of BR and ibrutinib or even ibrutinib alone could be reduced by more than 80%, regimen comprising of BR as first-line therapy followed by second-line ibrutinib would become cost-effective. Interpretation: At the current market prices, regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy is the most cost-effective strategy for CLL treatment in India. Funding: Department of Health Research, Government of India.
RESUMO
Management of advanced ovarian cancer underwent a paradigm shift with advent of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy requires complex machinery and costly disposables, and increased operative time. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a relatively less resource-intensive alternative way of intraperitoneal drug delivery. We started our HIPEC programme in 2013. In select cases, we offer EPIC. This study is an audit of outcomes to look into the feasibility of EPIC as alternative to HIPEC. We performed analysis of prospectively maintained database in the Department of Surgical oncology from January 2019 to June 2022. We had 15 patients who underwent CRS + EPIC and 84 CRS+ HIPEC. We did a propensity-matched analysis for demographics, baseline data and PCI and compared 15 CRS + EPIC with 15 CRS + HIPEC patients. We compared the perioperative outcomes-morbidity, mortality, length of ICU and hospital stay. Procedure time was significantly higher in the HIPEC compared to EPIC as HIPEC is an intraoperative procedure. Patients were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery for a longer mean duration in HIPEC arm (1.4 + 0.7 days) compared to EPIC arm (1.2 + 0.41 days). Patients in HIPEC arm had a significantly shorter hospital stay (mean 7.93 vs. 9.93 days. Four patients in EPIC arm had Clavien-Dindo grade 3 and 4 morbidity compared to 1 patient in HIPEC arm. Hematological toxicity was more common in EPIC group. CRS with EPIC can be explored as an alternative to HIPEC in centres lacking facilities and expertise for HIPEC.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Estudos Prospectivos , Citometria de Fluxo , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Compostos RadiofarmacêuticosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib and pazopanib are the mainstay of treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in India. However, pembrolizumab and nivolumab have shown significant improvement in the median progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with mRCC. In this study, we aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the first-line treatment options for the patients with mRCC in India. METHODS: A Markov state-transition model was used to measure the lifetime costs and health outcomes associated with sunitinib, pazopanib, pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, and nivolumab/ipilimumab among patients with first-line mRCC. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with a given treatment option was compared against the next best alternative and assessed for cost-effectiveness using a willingness to pay threshold of one-time per capita gross-domestic product of India. The parameter uncertainty was analyzed using the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: We estimated the total lifetime cost per patient of â¹ 0.27 million ($3,706 US dollars [USD]), â¹ 0.35 million ($4,716 USD), â¹ 9.7 million ($131,858 USD), and â¹ 6.7 million ($90,481 USD) for the sunitinib, pazopanib, pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, and nivolumab/ipilimumab arms, respectively. Similarly, the mean QALYs lived per patient were 1.91, 1.86, 2.75, and 1.97, respectively. Sunitinib incurs an average cost of â¹ 143,269 ($1,939 USD) per QALY lived. Therefore, sunitinib at current reimbursement rates (â¹ 10,000 per cycle) has a 94.6% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of 1-time per capita gross-domestic product (â¹ 168,300) in the Indian context. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the current inclusion of sunitinib under India's publicly financed health insurance scheme.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Sunitinibe/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Nivolumabe , IpilimumabRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: CD229 has been found to be a useful plasma cell (PC) gating marker in multiple myeloma (MM). This study analyses the expression profile of CD229 on various bone marrow compartments namely, PC, non-PC and hematogones (HGs) using Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC). Furthermore, it evaluates the ability of CD229 to delineate normal PC (NPC) from aberrant PC (APC) in measurable residual disease assessment (MRD) in MM. METHODS: Bone marrow aspirates from patients diagnosed with MM (per standard IMWG criteria) were collected in EDTA and processed for MFC using a single tube 14-color antibody panel as per standard operating procedure. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients with a diagnosis of MM (26 treatment naïve and 48 on therapy) were evaluated. The expression of CD229 was homogenous on both the PC and HG compartments as compared to CD138 and CD38. On comparing the expression of individual markers, it was found to be statistically significant between PC, HGs and non-PC for all three markers (p < 0.001). APC showed lower median expression of CD38 and higher median expression of CD138 and CD229 as compared to NPC and was found to be statistically significant for all markers (p < 0.001). In terms of differential expression on NPC and APC; CD38 was found to be the most aberrantly expressed (70%; 52/74) followed by CD229 (7%; 5/74) and CD138 (5%; 4/74). CONCLUSIONS: CD229 can be used for the identification of PC and due to relatively homogenous expression; it can be used as a suitable marker for targeted therapies. However, precise discrimination of NPC from APC cannot be reliably achieved with CD229, limiting its utility as a useful marker of diagnostic relevance and MRD assessment in MM.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Imunofenotipagem , Plasmócitos/metabolismo , Anticorpos , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Citometria de FluxoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluate the cost and outcomes of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus fulvestrant, fulvestrant alone, and conventional chemotherapy as the second-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in India. METHODS: Using a Markov model, the clinical effectiveness of managing HR+, HER2- MBC in postmenopausal women with either a CDK4/6i (either ribociclib or palbociclib) and fulvestrant, fulvestrant alone, and chemotherapy (single-agent paclitaxel or capecitabine) was measured in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The costs were estimated from two different points of view: scenario I, as per the prevailing market prices of the drugs; and scenario II, as per the reimbursement rates set up by the publicly financed national health insurance scheme. Incremental cost per QALY gained with a given treatment option was compared against the next best alternative and was assessed for cost effectiveness using a threshold of 1-time the per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in India from a societal perspective. RESULTS: In scenario I, an MBC patient was found to incur a lifetime cost of Indian Rupees (â¹) 2.54 million ($34,644), â¹2.53 million ($34,496), â¹512,598 ($6,984), â¹326,026 ($4,442) and â¹237,115 ($3,230) for the ribociclib and palbociclib combination arms, fulvestrant monotherapy, single-agent paclitaxel and the single-agent capecitabine treatment arms, respectively. The lifetime cost for CDK4/6i (ribociclib and palbociclib) combination therapy, fulvestrant monotherapy, paclitaxel, and capecitabine arms was estimated to be â¹1.94 million ($26,459), â¹1.92 million ($26,220), â¹315,387 ($4,296), â¹187,392 ($2,553) and â¹153,263 ($2,088), respectively, in scenario II. The mean QALYs lived per MBC patient with CDK4/6i (either ribociclib or palbociclib) combination therapy, fulvestrant, paclitaxel and capecitabine were estimated to be 1.4, 1.0, 0.9 and 0.7, respectively. None of the treatment arms are cost effective at current prices and reimbursement rates at a threshold of 1-time the per capita GDP of India. However, a 78% reduction in the current market price or a 72% reduction in the reimbursement rate of fulvestrant in the government-funded insurance program will make it a cost-effective treatment option for HR+, HER2- MBC patients in India. CONCLUSION: CDK4/6i (ribociclib and palbociclib) therapy is not a cost-effective treatment option for MBC patients. A 72% reduction in the reimbursement rate for fulvestrant monotherapy will make it a cost-effective treatment option in the Indian context.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Aminopiridinas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Fulvestranto/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas , Pós-Menopausa , Purinas , PiridinasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Immunophenotypic profile and post-therapy alteration in antigenic expression were evaluated in normal, reactive, and aberrant plasma cells (NPC, RPC, and APC) for impact on measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Samples from non-MM staging marrow (n = 30), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 30) and MM (n = 724) were prospectively evaluated for expression profiles of NPC, RPC, and APC using antigens recommended in consensus guidelines. RESULTS: Polyclonal NPC-RPC demonstrated aberrations for all antigens evaluated with a higher frequency of aberrancies in post-therapy samples compared to treatment naïve samples (p < 0.001%). Immunomodulation in APC was observed in 79% of post-therapy samples with a change in expression of 1, 2, and ≥3 antigens in 19.9%, 15.6%, and 43.5% samples, respectively. In 13.4% of samples, APC showed no aberrancy and aberrant status was assigned based on cytoplasmic light chain restriction (cyLCR) alone. 9% samples with an admixture of NPC and APC displayed normal cytoplasmic kappa to lambda ratio (cyKLR) when the percentage of APC of total PC (neoplastic plasma cell index, NPCI), was below 25% and 50% for kappa and lambda restricted cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The panorama and high frequency of antigenic aberrations on polyclonal PC signify the importance of MRD assay validation on a large cohort under normal and reactive conditions. Frequent Immunophenotypic shifts in APC re-confirm the redundancy of baseline immunophenotype for MRD evaluation. Small clones of APC may be missed by assessment of cyKLR alone and therefore, surface marker aberrancy supported by cyLCR is required for definitive assignment of residual APC.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Plasmócitos , Antígenos CD/metabolismo , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Imunomodulação , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Neoplasia Residual/metabolismo , Plasmócitos/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer have a poor prognosis with a 1-year survival rate of 10%-15%. Recently, an antiangiogenic humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab has shown to improve the survival of these patients. This study was designed to assess the cost effectiveness of incorporating bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer in India. METHODS: Using a disaggregated societal perspective and lifetime horizon, a Markov model was developed for estimating the costs and health outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer treated with either standard chemotherapy alone or in combination with bevacizumab. Effectiveness data for each of the treatment regimen were assessed using estimates from Gynecologic Oncology Group 240 trial. Data on disease-specific mortality in metastatic cervical cancer, health system cost, and out-of-pocket expenditure were derived from Indian literature. Multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken to account for parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Over the lifetime of one patient with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer, bevacizumab along with standard chemotherapy results in a gain of 0.275 (0.052-0.469) life-years (LY) and 0.129 (0.032-0.218) quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), at an additional cost of $3,816 US dollars (USD; 2,513-5,571) compared with standard chemotherapy alone. This resulted in an incremental cost of $19,080 USD (7,230-52,434) per LY gained and $34,744 USD (15,782-94,914) per QALY gained with the use of bevacizumab plus standard chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Addition of bevacizumab to the standard chemotherapy is not cost effective for the treatment of advanced and metastatic cervical cancer in India at a threshold of 1-time per-capita gross domestic product.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We used plerixafor in 'a risk adapted approach' for stem cell mobilization for multiple myeloma (MM) patients prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January, 2017 and December, 2019 105 consecutive patients of MM were recruited (Study Cohort). Patients received inj G-CSF 10 µg/kg in 2 divided doses for 5 days. Day 4 peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ count was used as a guide; if count was < 20 cells/µl, patients received plerixafor. For those with ≥ 20 cells/µl apheresis was commenced on day 5. We compared their outcome with 156 MM patients transplanted between 2012 and 2016 with G-CSF mobilized PB stem cells (Control Cohort). Primary end point was to collect ≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (minimal harvest). Secondary end points were: no of apheresis sessions, percentage of patients with optimal stem cell harvest (≥4.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) and cost analysis. An intent to treat analysis was done. RESULT: 96.2% of patients achieved ≥ 2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in the study cohort vs. 87.2% in the control cohort, P < .01. Mean apheresis sessions were 1.5 vs. 1.7 respectively, P < .014 . Optimal stem cell harvest was 29.5% vs. 16%,P = .23. Days for neutrophil engraftment (P < 0.025) and for IV antibiotics (P < .0017) were favorable for the study cohort. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio was $ 15.80/- and $ 10.56/- per 1% increase to achieve a minimal and optimal harvest. CONCLUSION: Plerixafor in this risk adapted strategy resulted in successful mobilization, decreased time to engraftment and was cost effective.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Benzilaminas/uso terapêutico , Ciclamos/uso terapêutico , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacologia , Benzilaminas/farmacologia , Ciclamos/farmacologia , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: rs4340ID polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) correlates with serum ACE levels in many known cancers. This study analyzed ACE rs4340 ID polymorphism in lung cancer (LC) in older patients of North India and correlated it with addiction status. METHODS: The study enrolled all subjects aged 60 years and above with 154 LC and 205 healthy controls. Genotyping was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and validated by sequencing of 10% of the sample. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS Statistics 21. RESULTS: Genotype II was observed to have a significant 2.21-fold increased risk of LC as compared to the DD genotype and 3.43-folds enhanced risk with interaction of I allele with tobacco consumption habits as compared to D allele in LC was seen. CONCLUSION: The risk of LC was higher with II genotype as compared to DD genotype. Interactive effect showed that I allele with tobacco habits may increase the risk of LC.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The rising economic burden of cancer on healthcare system and patients in India has led to the increased demand for evidence in order to inform policy decisions such as drug price regulation, setting reimbursement package rates under publicly financed health insurance schemes and prioritising available resources to maximise value of investments in health. Economic evaluations are an integral component of this important evidence. Lack of existing evidence on healthcare costs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) makes conducting economic evaluations a very challenging task. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a national database for health expenditure and HRQOL for cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The present study proposes to develop a National Cancer Database for Cost and Quality of Life (CaDCQoL) in India. The healthcare costs will be estimated using a patient perspective. A cross-sectional study will be conducted to assess the direct out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), indirect cost and HRQOL among cancer patients who will be recruited at seven leading cancer centres from six states in India. Mean OOPE and HRQOL scores will be estimated by cancer site, stage of disease and type of treatment. Economic impact of cancer care on household financial risk protection will be assessed by estimating prevalence of catastrophic health expenditures and impoverishment. The national database would serve as a unique open access data repository to derive estimates of cancer-related OOPE and HRQOL. These estimates would be useful in conducting future cost-effectiveness analyses of management strategies for value-based cancer care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was granted by Institutional Ethics Committee vide letter no. PGI/IEC-03/2020-1565 of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented to the policymakers at national level.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Seguro SaúdeRESUMO
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important parameter to predict outcome in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Two different approaches have been used for the assessment of MRD by multiparametric flow cytometry that include the "Leukemia Associated Aberrant Immunophenotype (LAIP)" and "Difference from Normal (DFN)" approach. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 539 samples obtained from 281 patients of which 258 were paired samples and the remaining 23 samples were from post-induction time point only, to explore the utility of baseline immunophenotype (IPT) for MRD assessment. Single-tube 10-color panel was used both at diagnosis and MRD time points. Out of 281 patients, 31.67% (n = 89) were positive and 68.32% (n = 192) were negative for MRD. Among 258 paired diagnostic and follow-up samples, baseline IPT was required in only 9.31% (24/258) cases which included cases with hematogone pattern and isolated dim to negative CD10 expression patterns. Comparison of baseline IPT with post-induction MRD positive samples showed a change in expression of at least one antigen in 94.04% cases. Although the immunophenotypic change in expression of various antigens is frequent in post-induction samples of B-ALL, it does not adversely impact the MRD assessment. In conclusion, the baseline IPT is required in less than 10% of B-ALL, specifically those with hematogone pattern and/or dim to negative expression of CD10. Hence, a combination of DFN and LAIP approach is recommended for reliable MRD assessment.
Assuntos
Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/diagnóstico , Antígenos CD/análise , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem , Neoplasia Residual/terapia , Neprilisina/análise , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/terapia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The number of people with implanted hip prosthesis has grown worldwide. For radiotherapy planning of patients with hip implants, few main challenges are encountered. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of different planning algorithms in the presence of high-density metallic implant in the treatment of patients with carcinoma cervix. RESULTS: It was found that D98% were 44.49 ± 0.11, 44.51 ± 0.13, 44.39 ± 0.22, and 44.45 ± 0.16 Gy for 4FMC6MV (4-field technique calculated with Monte-Carlo algorithm and 6 MV photon energy), 4FMC6MV_WP (4-field technique calculated with Monte-Carlo algorithm and 6 MV photon energy without prosthesis), 4FCC6MV (4-field technique calculated with collapse-cone-convolution algorithm and 6 MV photon energy), and 4FCC6MV_WP (4-field technique calculated with collapse-cone-convolution algorithm and 6 MV photon energy without prosthesis) respectively. Similarly, D2% were 49.40 ± 0.84, 49.05 ± 0.76, 48.97 ± 0.91, and 48.57 ± 0.85 Gray (Gy) for 4FMC6MV, 4FMC6MV_WP, 4FCC6MV, and 4FCC6MV_WP respectively. The present study has not suggested any major difference between the Monte-Carlo (MC) and collapse-cone-convolution (CCC) calculation algorithm in the presence of high-Z metallic implants. Volume of bowel receiving 15 Gy dose has shown a significant difference with prosthesis cases. This study investigates that hip prosthesis creates considerable changes in the treatment planning of cervical malignancies. CONCLUSION: CCC algorithm is in good agreement with MC calculation algorithm in the presence of high-density metallic implants in terms of target coverage and avoidance organ sparing except few parameters.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Próteses e Implantes , Dosagem RadioterapêuticaRESUMO
Background & objectives: Prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved significantly in the past two decades. However, the symptoms burden is high at onset and treatment is generally prolonged with significant financial burden. This study was undertaken to assess the quality of life (QoL) and to analyse out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) incurred on MM patients being treated at a tertiary care cancer centre in north India. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study included 116 patients (aged >18 yr) of MM (both newly diagnosed and those with recurrent disease). For QoL assessment, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-validated questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C 30 version 3.0) and disease-specific QLQ MY20 were used. For assessing OOPE incurred on treatment, the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) questionnaire was used. Results: Bone pains (68.1%), fatigue (59.7%) and dyspnoea (54.6%) were common symptoms. The mean global health status/QoL score was 59.62±19.21. International Staging System (ISS) score correlated with global health status score, and gastritis was the main adverse effect. QoL score showed negative correlation to side effects of treatment (-0.53) of MY20 domain. On multivariate analysis, ISS stage (P<0.001) and adverse effects of treatment (P=0.02) were predictive factors. The median OOPE was â¹ 7900 (IQR, â¹ 4950-13,550) towards medical and â¹ 1150 (IQR, â¹ 500-3100) for non-medical expenses for the past one month. Interpretation & conclusions: Regular assessment of QoL in the clinical management of multiple myeloma patients has the potential of improving treatment outcomes. Measures to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure may improve treatment compliance.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Crude glycerol, a by-product of biodiesel industry, has been used for production of biodiesel and polyhydroxy-alkanoates. But question is: which product is economically favorable using crude glycerol as substrate? In this study, energy balance and economic assessment has been carried out for crude glycerol valorization for B10 biodiesel and polyhydroxy-butyrate (PHB) production. For same quantity of crude glycerol utilized, energy ratio for B10 production was higher than PHB production while unit production cost for B10 was lower than that of PHB. For 50 million L plant capacity of biodiesel, unit production cost was 0.77 $/L B10 while for 2 million kg plant capacity of PHB, unit production cost was 4.88 $/kg PHB. Thus, in present scenario production of biodiesel seems economically better than production of PHA with crude glycerol as raw material. This study is useful for researchers, environmental scientists and industries in identifying effective route for crude glycerol valorization.
Assuntos
Biocombustíveis , Glicerol , Butiratos , HidroxibutiratosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Aim of study is to investigate the effect of hip prosthesis on 6 and 15 MV photon beam energies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prosthesis was kept at the level of tray position. The measurements were done on Varian Clinac-iX linac. Customized prosthesis, termed as Prosthetic Metal Implant (PMI) was made up of wrought austenitic stainless steel rod and covered with paraffin-wax. 'Standard prosthesis' was made up of wrought titanium alloy. The dose profiles were measured for three field sizes i.e. 5, 10 and 20 cm at 100 cm SSD for 6 and 15 MV energies. The perturbation index (PI) was also calculated. RESULTS: Perturbation caused by standard prosthesis was approximately 50% higher than that of PMI. This result may be due to difference in dimension and not because of material composition. Variation of central axis dose might be due to the dimensions of PMI used for experiment which gave intermediate response (e.g. 102.1%, 141.0% and 117.7% for Open, Standard and PMI respectively for 10x10 cm2 field size, 10 cm depth and 15MV photon beam setup )as compared to the 'open' and 'standard' prosthesis. Percentage dose at 10 cm for 6MV photon increased rapidly with field-size for PMI. But, for 15MV photon, difference was not significant. Surface dose (Ds) for PMI remains significantly higher for smaller field. CONCLUSION: The perturbation index varied from 0.05 to 0.22 for the measured energies and gave an idea to the planner to assess the behavior of the prosthesis. This range is applicable for both type of implants and for all clinical field-sizes. The attenuation caused by the prosthesis was significant and this effect should be considered in the treatment planning calculations.