Assessment of 285 cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia seen at single large tertiary center in Northern India.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common lymphoproliferative disorder in the West accounting for about 30% of leukemias, but about 2-4% in India. There is no large series reported from India, and hence we decided to undertake this study. We assessed the clinicohematological profiles and treatment outcomes in 285 patients seen over 11 years at our center (median age 59 years, 209 males). Sixty-three patients (22%) were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally. The median total leukocyte count at presentation was 50 × 10(9)/L. Rai stage distribution was: stage 0, 10%; stage I, 16%; stage II, 33%; stage III, 20%; and stage IV, 21%. Fifty percent of patients required treatment at presentation. Ninety-six patients received chlorambucil-based (overall response rate [ORR] 69%, complete remission [CR] 3%) and 27 patients received fludarabine-based (ORR 89%, CR 44%) chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 5.1 and 4.6 years, respectively. Fludarabine was more toxic, as half of the patients developed febrile neutropenia and various infections. The majority of patients presented with advanced stage disease. Fludarabine was less commonly used as first-line therapy. Advanced clinical stage (Rai III and IV) was associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-5.11, p = 0.001) and EFS.

Response assessment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib mesylate (Glivec) therapy: experience from a single center in a developing country.

Imatinib mesylate, a targeted inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, is a standard of care for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). There are few publications on responses of patients with CML from the Indian subcontinent. This study analyzed the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities in patients with CML given imatinib. Analysis included patients with CML who received imatinib under the GIPAP program at our institution from January 2002 to December 2008. Standard criteria for hematological and cytogenetic responses were used. There were 400 patients, with a median follow-up of 47 months. One hundred and seventy received prior non-imatinib therapy and 230 patients received imatinib upfront. Ninety-five percent of patients achieved complete hematological response. The cumulative best rate of major cytogenetic response was 72%, with 53% complete cytogenetic response and 19% partial cytogenetic response. The estimated PFS and OS at median follow-up for the whole group was 76% and 94%, respectively. Differences in PFS and OS in prior non-imatinib and upfront imatinib groups were not statistically significant. However, better PFS and OS were seen in the upfront imatinib group. Imatinib was well tolerated in our study.

Comparison of three different staining techniques for intraoperative assessment of nodal metastasis in breast cancer.

Imprint cytology has increasingly been used for intraoperative assessment of nodal status in breast cancer. We carried out this study to compare the efficacy of Jenner Giemsa (JG), hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), and Papanicolaou (Pap) stains for intraoperative lymph node imprint cytology (IIC) in breast cancer. One hundred and seven cases of stage I-III breast cancer were studied. Overall, IIC was accurate in 95.3% cases and had a sensitivity and specificity of 98.5% and 90.0%, respectively. The accuracy of JG (95.3%) was better than that of H&E (90.6%) and Pap (94.0%), although the differences were not statistically significant. Problems encountered included cell loss and drying artifacts with H&E and Pap and the inability to distinguish between tumor cells and histiocytes confidently in tight cellular clusters that were occasionally seen. Opinion was possible in all JG cases, but not in five and four cases by H&E and Pap, respectively. Although the choice of the stain would vary depending on the experience of the pathologist, our work suggests that JG, because of fewer technical problems and superior accuracy, may be preferable over H&E and Pap.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy assessment using intraoperative imprint cytology in breast cancer patients: results of a validation study.

OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients is emerging as a promising minimally-invasive tool. There has been an exponential increase in the literature related to sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in breast cancer patients, mainly from Western centres. This study was carried out to address issues relevant to breast cancer patients in developing countries, including the method of SLN detection, the role of imprint cytology in the assessment of SLN, and the role of SLNB in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: This study included 76 women with breast cancer. The blue-dye method was used to identify the sentinel node. Touch imprint smears were prepared from the sectioned node, stained using the Jenner-Geimsa technique, and examined for tumour deposits. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were identified in 69 of 76 patients. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SLNB in predicting axillary node status were 84.2%, 100% and 91.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology were 96.9%, 100% and 98.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results prove that high levels of SLN detection can be achieved using the blue-dye method alone. Its role in LABC patients needs further evaluation. In view of promising results, imprint cytology should be used more frequently as an alternative to frozen section for the assessment of sentinel nodes.

Economical choices in setting up a diagnostic myeloma laboratory.

In setting up a diagnostic myeloma laboratory the popular, highly automated and otherwise excellent choices of equipment and laboratory practices, so exorbitantly raise costs that the sustainability, even in large government hospitals in third world countries may become difficult. Based on our experience in a regional cancer center in India, we offer here, guidelines for carrying out high resolution electrophoresis, densitometry, immunofixation and urine concentration. We show that by simply employing well established techniques and doing them properly, one can get results of excellent quality at minimum cost and minimum dependence on costly imports.