Response to gastroesophageal reflux disease therapy: assessment at 4 weeks predicts response/non-response at 8 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Many questionnaires that assess subjective symptoms or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have been developed to confirm the efficacy of treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, few reports have correlated early improvements in scale scores with predictions of subsequent therapeutic responses. Our aim was to investigate the appropriate timing for evaluating therapeutic response and subsequent changes in symptoms and HRQOL. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. A total of 5,279 GERD patients with Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) scores ≥ 8 points at baseline were analyzed. Correlations between HRQOL and FSSG were investigated and logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: The FSSG scores and HRQOL improvements in responders were significantly greater than in non-responders. Positive correlation between FSSG and HRQOL was observed. Based on the analysis, severity of esophagitis at baseline, complications of hypertension, higher HRQOL mental score at baseline, and higher FSSG score at baseline were predictors of responders. Gastrectomy, complication of insomnia, and prior medication with proton pump inhibitors were predictors of non-responders. CONCLUSION: Evaluating patients' symptoms during the fourth week of rabeprazole therapy allows predictions of subsequent changes in subjective symptoms and HRQOL.

Comparison of endoscopic findings with symptom assessment systems (FSSG and QUEST) for gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japanese centres.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We compared endoscopic findings of the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG), a written questionnaire developed in Japan, to that for the questionnaire for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis (QUEST) for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. METHODS: We registered 475 patients with untreated symptoms of upper abdominal pain (male/female: 252/223, average age 52.4 +/- 17.8 years). Subjects were assessed first with the FSSG and QUEST questionnaires, then by endoscopy, before allocation to a gastric ulcer (GU), duodenal ulcer (DU), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or functional dyspepsia (FD) group. RESULTS: On the basis of the endoscopic findings the diagnoses for the 475 subjects were as follows: FD 52.2%, DU 7.6%, GU 7.8%, and GERD 32.4% (Grade M 10.1%, Grade A + B 20.2%, Grade C + D 2.3%). There was no difference between the FSSG and QUEST in sensitivity, specificity or accuracy for any condition. The FSSG score rose with increasing endoscopic severity of GERD, but there was no correlation between the QUEST score and endoscopic severity. The FSSG total score was inferior to QUEST in terms of distinguishing GERD from other conditions, but when only the questions relating to reflux symptoms were used, the FSSG was able to distinguish GERD from other conditions as well as QUEST. CONCLUSIONS: The FSSG score reflects the severity of the endoscopic findings of GERD.