Site-specific ecological risk assessment of metal-contaminated soils based on the TRIAD approach.

Ecological risk assessment based on scientific data is crucial for understanding causal relationships between chemical pollution and environmental risks. Simultaneously, a balance is required between socioeconomic factors and scientific evidence. The TRIAD approach, which incorporates three lines of evidence (LoE)-chemical (Chem-LoE), ecotoxicological (Ecotox-LoE), and ecological (Eco-LoE)-was applied in five sites of an abandoned mine for site-specific soil ecological risk assessment (SERA). In combination, the three LoEs showed that two sites had extremely high risks, one site had moderate risk, and the other site had low risk. At all sites, Chem-LoE exhibited high-integrated risk values. In Ecotox-LoE and Eco-LoE, some species were not affected despite high metal concentrations in the soil samples collected from the sites, indicating that the bioavailability of metals differed according to the physiochemical properties of the soil medium. This study is significant as multiple analyses were performed considering ecosystem structure to reduce uncertainty in SERA. The results provide information to support effective decision-making risk management to protect the soil ecosystem. Moreover, these findings will be useful in establishing policies and priorities for soil risk management.

Ecological risk assessment for perfluorooctanoic acid in soil using a species sensitivity approach.

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is one of the persistent organic pollutants that has been listed in Annex A of the Stockholm Convention and has attracted attention owing to its endocrine-disrupting properties. However, there is currently little information available regarding the soil ecotoxicity of PFOA and the associated ecological risks. Accordingly, in this study, we sought to assess the soil ecological risk of PFOA based on a probabilistic approach using data obtained from multispecies bioassays and soil toxicity assessments, from which we generated soil species sensitivity distributions and estimated soil protective concentrations for PFOA. Using the latter distributions, we also undertook a probabilistic ecological risk assessment. On the basis of acute and chronic toxicity estimates obtained from bioassays involving eight soil-associated organisms from six diverse taxonomic groups, we could deduce that PFOA poses a negligible risk to soil ecosystems. However, we also found that this chemical may be more toxic than some of the established endocrine-disrupting chemicals such as bisphenol A, nonylphenol, and methylparaben, thereby indicating that further in-depth studies would be necessary to obtain a better understanding of the toxic potential of this chemical in the soil environment.

Estimation of daily fish intake values for use with water quality criteria for human health assessments in Korea.

Daily fish intake is a key parameter of water quality criteria for protecting human health. Daily fish intake values should be representative of consumption patterns and must be practical for regulatory purposes. Thus, values must be scientifically verified and regularly updated for inclusion in water quality criteria. In Korea, four different fish intake values have been identified from food balance sheets (KREI 2000), the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) II (Ministry of Health and Welfare 2002), Korean Exposure Factors Handbook (MOE 2007a), and KNHANES IV-V (CDC 2008; 2009; 2010), which have been applied to water quality standards and related national projects and regulations. This paper reviews the estimation methodologies of previous daily fish intake values from multiple sources and improvements in these values between 2000 and 2012. Finally, limitations associated with each value were examined to assist future research and regulatory management. This review provides information on changes in the daily fish intake values and their application in water quality standards in Korea.