Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 12: 693-709, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33262624

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a malignancy restricted to the inner lining of the bladder. Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) following transurethral resection of the bladder tumor is the mainstay first-line treatment for high-risk NMIBC patients. Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) were conducted to further assess the current evidence on BCG use in NMIBC and the humanistic and economic burden of disease. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, Embase® and MEDLINE® were searched using the Ovid platform to identify interventional or real-world evidence studies on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and economic burden in NMIBC. Limited evidence was found from initial economic SLR searches in NMIBC, so additional targeted searches for bladder cancer were conducted to expand findings. RESULTS: Fifty-nine publications were included in the HRQoL SLR, of which 23 reported HRQoL and symptoms in NMIBC. At diagnosis, HRQoL was comparable with population norms but worsened considerably 2 years following diagnosis. Maintenance therapy with intravesical BCG was associated with reduced HRQoL, and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) resembled typical NMIBC symptoms. Twenty-two studies reported decreasing BCG compliance over time. Common AEs with BCG were frequent urination, lower urinary tract symptoms, pain, and hematuria. Forty-two publications were included in the economic SLR, of which nine assessed healthcare costs and resource use in NMIBC or bladder cancer. High-risk disease and high-intensity treatment were associated with increased healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: NMIBC has a considerable symptomatic, HRQoL, and economic burden. Symptoms persisted and HRQoL worsened despite intravesical BCG treatment. NMIBC is a costly disease, with higher healthcare costs associated with increased risk of disease progression and recurrence. There is a high unmet need for safe and effective treatments that reduce the risk of disease progression and recurrence, provide symptomatic relief, and improve HRQoL for patients.

2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 7(8): 775-784, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29848048

RESUMO

Aim: Eltrombopag and romiplostim are comparable second-line therapies in chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Treatment decisions are made in different contexts. A framework was created to outline decision pathways for physicians and payers. Materials & methods: The costs of drugs, administration, routine care, bleeding, other adverse events and mortality were included in the year-long calculation of total costs from a US private payer perspective. Treatment parameters and outcome data were obtained from relevant clinical trials. Results: The total cost per year, per patient of eltrombopag was US$51,000 versus US$76,000 for romiplostim. Drug costs and costs associated with bleeding-related events were the main drivers of cost difference. Conclusion: This framework facilitates decision-making in the management of chronic immune thrombocytopenia with eltrombopag and romiplostim.


Assuntos
Benzoatos/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Hidrazinas/uso terapêutico , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Receptores Fc/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Trombopoetina/agonistas , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Trombopoetina/uso terapêutico , Benzoatos/efeitos adversos , Benzoatos/economia , Doença Crônica , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Custos de Medicamentos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Hidrazinas/efeitos adversos , Hidrazinas/economia , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Pirazóis/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/economia , Trombopoetina/efeitos adversos , Trombopoetina/economia , Estados Unidos
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 78, 2018 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29391064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) typically use several drug treatments during their lifetime. There is a debate about the best second-line therapy after metformin monotherapy failure due to the increasing number of available antidiabetic drugs and the lack of comparative clinical trials of secondary treatment regimens. While prior research compared the cost-effectiveness of two alternative drugs, the literature assessing T2D treatment pathways is scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) compared to sulfonylureas (SU) as second-line therapy in combination with metformin in patients with T2D. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with four health states, 1 year cycle, and a 25-year time horizon. Clinical and cost data were collected from previous studies and other readily available secondary data sources. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated from the US third party payer perspective. Both, costs and outcomes, were discounted at a 3% annual discount rate. One way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of uncertainty on the base-case results. RESULTS: The discounted incremental cost of metformin+DPP-4i compared to metformin+SU was $11,849 and the incremental life-years gained were 0.61, resulting in an ICER of $19,420 per life-year gained for patients in the metformin+DPP-4i treatment pathway. The ICER estimated in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis was $19,980 per life-year gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results of the study were not sensitive to changes in the parameters used in base-case. CONCLUSIONS: The metformin+DPP-4i treatment pathway was cost-effective compared to metformin+SU as a long-term second-line therapy in the treatment of T2D from the US health care payer perspective. Study findings have the potential to provide clinicians and third party payers valuable evidence for the prescription and utilization of cost-effective second-line therapy after metformin monotherapy failure in the treatment of T2D.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/economia , Dipeptidil Peptidases e Tripeptidil Peptidases , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Metformina/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA