Centering Communities of Color in the Modernization of a Public Health Survey System: Lessons from Oregon.

Context: Public health survey systems are tools for informing public health programming and policy at the national, state, and local levels. Among the challenges states face with these kinds of surveys include concerns about the representativeness of communities of color and lack of community engagement in survey design, analysis, and interpretation of results or dissemination, which raises questions about their integrity and relevance. Approach: Using a data equity framework (rooted in antiracism and intersectionality), the purpose of this project was to describe a formative participatory assessment approach to address challenges in Oregon Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and Student Health Survey (SHS) data system by centering community partnership and leadership in (1) understanding and interpreting data; (2) identifying strengths, gaps, and limitations of data and methodologies; (3) facilitating community-led data collection on community-identified gaps in the data; and (4) developing recommendations. Results: Project team members' concerns, observations, and critiques are organized into six themes. Throughout this engagement process, community partners, including members of the project teams, shared a common concern: that these surveys reproduced the assumptions, norms, and methodologies of the dominant (White, individual centered) scientific approach and, in so doing, created further harm by excluding community knowledges and misrepresenting communities of color. Conclusions: Meaningful community leadership is needed for public health survey systems to provide more actionable pathways toward improving population health outcomes. A data equity approach means centering communities of color throughout survey cycles, which can strengthen the scientific integrity and relevance of these data to inform community health efforts.

Doctors for the people? The problematic distribution of rural service doctors in Ecuador.

Primary health care is at the core of health systems that aim to ensure equitable health outcomes. With an estimated 36% of rural population, Ecuador has a service year programme (created in 1970) for recently graduated doctors to provide primary care services in rural and remote communities. However, little has been done to monitor or evaluate the programme since its inception. The aim of this study was to assess Ecuador's rural medical service implementation with a focus on equitable distribution of doctors across the country. For this purpose, we analysed the distribution of all doctors, including rural service doctors, in health-care facilities across rural and remote areas of Ecuador in the public sector at the canton level for 2015 and 2019, by level of care (primary, secondary and tertiary). We used publicly available data from the Ministry of Public Health, the Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security and the Peasant Social Security. Our analyses show that two of every three rural service doctors are concentrated at the secondary level, while almost one in five rural service doctors, at the tertiary level. Moreover, cantons concentrating most rural service doctors were in the country's major urban centres (Quito, Guayaquil, Cuenca). To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative assessment of the mandatory rural service year in Ecuador in its five-decade existence. We provide evidence of gaps and inequities impacting rural communities and present decision makers with a methodology for placement, monitoring and support of the rural service doctors programme, provided that legal and programmatic reforms come into place. Changing the programme's approach would be more likely to fulfill the intended goals of rural service and contribute to strengthening primary health care.

Perceived Anti-Immigrant Climate, Health Care Discrimination, and Satisfaction with Care Among US Latino Adults.

A growing body of evidence has documented the effects of discrimination among Latinos. However, little is known about the impacts a noxious sociopolitical climate can have on their health and health care outcomes. The present study explored the associations between perceived anti-immigrant climate, health care discrimination, and satisfaction with care among US Latino adults. We used data from the 2015 Latino National Health and Immigration Survey (n = 1,284), a nationally representative sample of US Latino adults (ages 18 and older). Key predictors included living in a state whose policies are unfavorable towards immigrants, perceived anti-immigrant climate and/or anti-Hispanic climate, and health care discrimination. Ordered logistic regression models evaluated the associations between these predictors (adjusting for other relevant covariates) and satisfaction with care. Latinos living in state that is unfavorable towards immigrants were less likely to be satisfied with medical care they receive. Also, we found that Latinos living in anti-immigrant and anti-Hispanic climates were less likely to be satisfied with care. In both cases, experiencing health care discrimination significantly reduced the odds of satisfaction with care. Latinos' perception of an anti-immigrant & anti-Hispanic climate and state policies can have detrimental effects on their health and health care outcomes. These results highlight the importance of addressing both community-wide and interpersonal discrimination specific to health care settings, which can have concurrent impacts on the health and well-being of Latino and other minoritized populations.

Testing measurement equivalence of neurocognitive assessments across language in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological instruments are often developed in English and translated to other languages to facilitate the clinical evaluation of diverse populations or to utilize in research environments. However, the psychometric equivalence of these assessments across language must be demonstrated before populations can validly be compared. METHOD: To test this equivalence, we applied measurement invariance procedures to a subsample (N = 1,708) of the Hispanic Community Health Survey/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) across English and Spanish versions of a neurocognitive battery. Using cardinality matching, 854 English-speaking and 854 Spanish-speaking subsamples were matched on age, education, sex, immigration status (U.S. born, including territories, or foreign-born), and Hispanic/Latino heritage background. Neurocognitive measures included the Six-Item Screener (SIS), Brief-Spanish English Verbal Learning Test (B-SEVLT), Word Fluency (WF), and Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS). Confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to test item-level invariance of the SIS, B-SEVLT, and WF, as well as factor-level invariance of a higher-order neurocognitive functioning latent variable. RESULTS: One item of both the SIS and WF were more difficult in Spanish than English, as was the DSS test. After accounting for partial invariance, Spanish-speakers performed worse on each of the subtests and the second-order neurocognitive functioning latent variable. CONCLUSIONS: We found some evidence of bias at both item and factor levels, contributing to the poorer neurocognitive performance of Spanish test-takers. While these results explain the underperformance of Spanish-speakers to some extent, more work is needed to determine whether such bias is reflective of true cognitive differences or additional variables unaccounted for in this study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Sustainability in chronic disease prevention: lessons from the Salud al Paso program in Ecuador

[ABSTRACT]. This study analyzes the conditions and possibilities of sustainability of the Salud al Paso program of the Metropolitan Health Secretariat of the Municipality of Quito, Ecuador, as an example for similar initiatives, in the context of the changes made by the new administration in May 2019. The analysis of the implementation of this initiative, focused on the prevention of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), was based on the program’s user database, the information gathered on the perspectives of operational staff, knowledge of the program, and the opinion of local leaders and opinion leaders of the Quito Metropolitan District, as well as official information. Based on this data, the study identified factors that could have facilitated or hindered its sustainability and documented the rationale to suspend the on-demand activities included in the program and limit activities to the care of populations under municipal responsibility (day-care centers, schools and colleges, markets, elder care programs, and employees) and patients with identified cardiometabolic risk. The insufficient institutionalization of the program, conceived as a project with an insufficient vision of its sustainability in time, was mentioned as a possible obstacle by leaders and operational staff. The growing prevalence of NCDs requires initiatives for their prevention, which must be institutionalized to ensure their continuity and overcome eventual changes of government. In addition, future interventions similar to Salud al Paso should establish better sectoral coordination articulation, especially with the Ministry of Public Health and other service networks.

[RESUMEN]. El presente estudio analiza las condiciones y posibilidades de permanencia del programa Salud al Paso de la Secretaría Metropolitana de Salud del Municipio de Quito, Ecuador, como ejemplo para iniciativas similares, en el contexto de los cambios efectuados por la nueva administración en mayo del 2019. El análisis de esta implementación enfocada en la prevención de enfermedades no transmisibles se centró en la base de datos de usuarios del programa, la información recabada desde las perspectivas del personal operativo, el conocimiento del programa y el posicionamiento de líderes locales y de opinión del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, así como información oficial. Con base en estos datos, el estudio identificó factores que podrían haber facilitado u obstaculizado su permanencia y documentó la fundamentación de las nuevas autoridades para suspender las actividades de libre demanda propias del programa y limitar la atención a las poblaciones bajo responsabilidad municipal (guarderías, escuelas y colegios, mercados, programas de atención a la tercera edad y empleados) y de pacientes con riesgo cardiometabólico identificado. La institucionalización insuficiente del programa, concebido más como proyecto y con una también insuficiente visión de permanencia en el tiempo, fue mencionada como un posible obstáculo por líderes y personal operativo. La prevalencia creciente de enfermedades no transmisibles demanda iniciativas para su prevención, que deben institucionalizarse para asegurar su continuidad y superar eventuales cambios de gobierno. Además, intervenciones futuras semejantes a Salud al Paso deberán establecer una mejor articulación sectorial, en especial con el Ministerio de Salud Pública y otras redes de servicios.

Sustainability in chronic disease prevention: lessons from the Salud al Paso program in Ecuador / Sostenibilidad en la prevención de enfermedades crónicas: lecciones del programa Salud al Paso en Ecuador

ABSTRACT This study analyzes the conditions and possibilities of sustainability of the Salud al Paso program of the Metropolitan Health Secretariat of the Municipality of Quito, Ecuador, as an example for similar initiatives, in the context of the changes made by the new administration in May 2019. The analysis of the implementation of this initiative, focused on the prevention of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), was based on the program's user database, the information gathered on the perspectives of operational staff, knowledge of the program, and the opinion of local leaders and opinion leaders of the Quito Metropolitan District, as well as official information. Based on this data, the study identified factors that could have facilitated or hindered its sustainability and documented the rationale to suspend the on-demand activities included in the program and limit activities to the care of populations under municipal responsibility (day-care centers, schools and colleges, markets, elder care programs, and employees) and patients with identified cardiometabolic risk. The insufficient institutionalization of the program, conceived as a project with an insufficient vision of its sustainability in time, was mentioned as a possible obstacle by leaders and operational staff. The growing prevalence of NCDs requires initiatives for their prevention, which must be institutionalized to ensure their continuity and overcome eventual changes of government. In addition, future interventions similar to Salud al Paso should establish better sectoral coordination articulation, especially with the Ministry of Public Health and other service networks.

RESUMEN El presente estudio analiza las condiciones y posibilidades de permanencia del programa Salud al Paso de la Secretaría Metropolitana de Salud del Municipio de Quito, Ecuador, como ejemplo para iniciativas similares, en el contexto de los cambios efectuados por la nueva administración en mayo del 2019. El análisis de esta implementación enfocada en la prevención de enfermedades no transmisibles se centró en la base de datos de usuarios del programa, la información recabada desde las perspectivas del personal operativo, el conocimiento del programa y el posicionamiento de líderes locales y de opinión del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, así como información oficial. Con base en estos datos, el estudio identificó factores que podrían haber facilitado u obstaculizado su permanencia y documentó la fundamentación de las nuevas autoridades para suspender las actividades de libre demanda propias del programa y limitar la atención a las poblaciones bajo responsabilidad municipal (guarderías, escuelas y colegios, mercados, programas de atención a la tercera edad y empleados) y de pacientes con riesgo cardiometabólico identificado. La institucionalización insuficiente del programa, concebido más como proyecto y con una también insuficiente visión de permanencia en el tiempo, fue mencionada como un posible obstáculo por líderes y personal operativo. La prevalencia creciente de enfermedades no transmisibles demanda iniciativas para su prevención, que deben institucionalizarse para asegurar su continuidad y superar eventuales cambios de gobierno. Además, intervenciones futuras semejantes a Salud al Paso deberán establecer una mejor articulación sectorial, en especial con el Ministerio de Salud Pública y otras redes de servicios.

Sostenibilidad en la prevención de enfermedades crónicas: lecciones del programa Salud al Paso en Ecuador

[RESUMEN]. El presente estudio analiza las condiciones y posibilidades de permanencia del programa “Salud al Paso” de la Secretaría Metropolitana de Salud del Municipio de Quito, Ecuador, como ejemplo para iniciativas similares, en el contexto de los cambios efectuados por la nueva administración en mayo del 2019. El análisis de esta implementación enfocada en la prevención de enfermedades no transmisibles se centró en la base de datos de usuarios del programa, la información recabada desde las perspectivas del personal operativo, el conocimiento del programa y el posicionamiento de líderes locales y de opinión del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, así como información oficial. Con base en estos datos, el estudio identificó factores que podrían haber facilitado u obstaculizado su permanencia y documentó la fundamentación de las nuevas autoridades para suspender las actividades de libre demanda propias del programa y limitar la atención a las poblaciones bajo responsabilidad municipal (guarderías, escuelas y colegios, mercados, programas de atención a la tercera edad y empleados) y de pacientes con riesgo cardiometabólico identificado. La institucionalización insuficiente del programa, concebido más como proyecto y con una también insuficiente visión de permanencia en el tiempo, fue mencionada como un posible obstáculo por líderes y personal operativo. La prevalencia creciente de enfermedades no transmisibles demanda iniciativas para su prevención, que deben institucionalizarse para asegurar su continuidad y superar eventuales cambios de gobierno. Además, intervenciones futuras semejantes a Salud al Paso deberán establecer una mejor articulación sectorial, en especial con el Ministerio de Salud Pública y otras redes de servicios.

[ABSTRACT]. This study analyzes the conditions and possibilities of sustainability of the “Salud al Paso” program of the Metropolitan Health Secretariat of the Municipality of Quito, Ecuador, as an example for similar initiatives, in the context of the changes made by the new administration in May 2019. The analysis of this implementation, focused on the prevention of noncommunicable diseases, was based on the program’s user database, the information gathered on the perspectives of operational personnel, knowledge of the program, and the opinion of local leaders and opinion leaders of the Quito Metropolitan District, as well as official information. Based on this data, the study identified factors that could have facilitated or hindered its sustainability and documented the rationale to suspend the free demand activities included in the program and limit the activities to the care of populations under municipal responsibility (day-care centers, schools and colleges, markets, elderly care programs and employees) and patients with identified cardiometabolic risk. The insufficient institutionalization of the program, conceived more as a project with an also insufficient vision of sustainability in time, was mentioned as a possible obstacle by leaders and operational staff. The growing prevalence of noncommunicable diseases requires initiatives for their prevention, which must be institutionalized to ensure their continuity and overcome eventual changes of government. In addition, future interventions similar to Salud al Paso should establish better sectoral articulation, especially with the Ministry of Public Health and other service networks.

The Association of Cultural and Structural Factors with Perceived Medical Mistrust Among Young Adult Latinos in Rural Oregon.

Although previous studies have examined the impact of medical mistrust on the health and health care seeking behaviors of diverse populations, including Latinos, limited research has explored cultural and structural factors that contribute to medical mistrust. The aim of the present study was to examine the associations between cultural and structural factors and perceived medical mistrust among a sample of young adult Latinos living in rural Oregon. We conducted in-person interviews with 499 young adult Latinos (ages 18-25). Medical mistrust was assessed using a modified version of the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale, which has been used with Latino populations. We included three cultural (acculturation, machismo, and familismo) and one structural (perceived everyday discrimination) variables, all measured using previously validated scales. Socio-demographic variables (eg, age, gender, income, educational level, employment) were also included in multivariable linear regression models. We found that everyday discrimination and traditional machismo values were associated with medical mistrust, the latter primarily among Latino women. It is possible that Latinos living in relatively new minority/immigrant settlement areas (such as rural Oregon) may be more vulnerable to experiencing discrimination, which in turn, may erode trust in health care providers. On the other hand, a strong ethnic identity, including the endorsement of machismo values, may serve as a protective mechanism for Latinos confronted by racial/ethnic discrimination. Culturally responsive, socio-cultural, and societal interventions are warranted to tackle the pervasive and ripple effects that racial/ethnic discrimination has on the health of Latinos and other minority populations.

Psychometric Properties of a Healthcare Discrimination Scale Among Young-Adult Latinos.

OBJECTIVES: A growing body of research has found that healthcare discrimination is a significant barrier in accessing healthcare among Latino patients. Despite evidence of the effects of perceived discrimination among Latinos, psychometric testing of scales used in previous research is limited. The present study explored the psychometric properties of a healthcare discrimination scale (HDS) among young-adult Latinos. METHODS: We used data from a cross-sectional study of young-adult Latinos, primarily of Mexican heritage, living in rural Oregon. Bilingual, bicultural staff members conducted computer-assisted personal interviews matched by gender with 313 individuals who completed the interview in Spanish (n = 137) or English (n = 176). The interview guide included questions for the HDS and the experiences of discrimination (EOD) and acculturation scales, and satisfaction with healthcare services. Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, split-half reliability, and convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. RESULTS: The HDS scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92), was strongly correlated with the EOD scale (r = 0.70, p < 0.001), and weakly correlated with the acculturation scale (r = 0.17, p < 0.01). Discriminant validity was stronger among English speakers (r = - 0.06, p = 0.422). Split-half reliability was 0.87 (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a one-factor solution for both Spanish and English language respondents. The HDS was significantly associated with satisfaction with healthcare services, indicative of good predictive validity. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the healthcare discrimination scale is a valid and reliable tool to use among Spanish and English-speaking young-adult Latinos. Further testing is needed among Latinos of other ages and background groups.

Racial and Ethnic Discrimination, Medical Mistrust, and Satisfaction with Birth Control Services among Young Adult Latinas.

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic discrimination and medical mistrust contribute to disparities in use of and satisfaction with health care services. Previous work examining the influence of discrimination and medical mistrust on health care experiences has focused primarily on African Americans. Despite the finding that Latinas report lower rates of contraceptive use than White women, little is known about the influence of these factors on health care satisfaction, specifically satisfaction with contraceptive services, among Latina women. METHODS: We conducted computer-assisted interviews with 254 Latina women aged 18 to 25 living in rural communities in Oregon. Only the 211 women who reported ever receiving birth control services answered the question regarding satisfaction with birth control services and were included in the analytic sample. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we explored the relationship between medical mistrust and everyday discrimination on satisfaction with birth control services, accounting for relevant factors. RESULTS: More than 80% of the total sample reported ever seeing a health care provider for birth control services and of these women, 75% reported being very or extremely satisfied with their birth control services. Latinas who reported higher levels of medical mistrust and racial/ethnic discrimination reported being less satisfied with birth control services. After adjusting for perceived barriers to accessing contraceptive services and other relevant factors, only perceived barriers and racial/ethnic discrimination remained significantly associated with satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the growing understanding of the pervasive effects that racial/ethnic discrimination and medical mistrust have on satisfaction with health services among Latinas in the United States.

Foreign-Born Latinos Living in Rural Areas are more likely to Experience Health Care Discrimination: Results from Proyecto de Salud para Latinos.

Health care discrimination is increasingly considered a significant barrier to accessing health services among minority populations, including Latinos. However, little is known about the role of immigration status. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between immigration status and perceived health care discrimination among Latinos living in rural areas. Interviews were conducted among 349 young-adult Latinos (ages 18 to 25) living in rural Oregon, as part of Proyecto de Salud para Latinos. Over a third of participants experienced health care discrimination (39.5 %). Discrimination was higher among foreign-born (44.9 %) rather than US-born Latinos (31.9 %). Multivariate results showed that foreign-born Latinos were significantly more likely to experience health care discrimination, even after controlling for other relevant factors (OR = 2.10, 95 % CI 1.16-3.82). This study provides evidence that health care discrimination is prevalent among young-adult Latinos living in rural areas, particularly the foreign-born. Effective approaches towards reducing discrimination in health care settings should take into consideration the need to reform our broken immigration system.

Medical mistrust, perceived discrimination, and satisfaction with health care among young-adult rural latinos.

PURPOSE: Little research has analyzed mistrust and discrimination influencing receipt of health care services among Latinos, particularly those living in rural areas. This study examined the associations between medical mistrust, perceived discrimination, and satisfaction with health care among young-adult rural Latinos. RESEARCH DESIGN: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 387 young-adult Latinos (ages 18-25) living in rural Oregon. The Behavioral Model of Vulnerable Populations was utilized as the theoretical framework. Correlations were run to assess bivariate associations among variables included in the study. Ordered logistic regression models evaluated the associations between medical mistrust, perceived discrimination, and satisfaction with health care. RESULTS: On average, participants used health services 4 times in the past year. Almost half of the participants had health insurance (46%). The majority reported that they were moderately (32%) or very satisfied (41%) with health care services used in the previous year. In multivariable models, medical mistrust and perceived discrimination were significantly associated with satisfaction with health care. CONCLUSIONS: Medical mistrust and perceived discrimination were significant contributors to lower satisfaction with health care among young-adult Latinos living in rural Oregon. Health care reform implementation, currently under way, provides a unique opportunity for developing evaluation systems and interventions toward monitoring and reducing rural Latino health care disparities.

Prevalence and correlates of food insecurity among students attending a midsize rural university in Oregon.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence and identify correlates of food insecurity among students attending a rural university in Oregon. METHODS: Cross-sectional nonprobability survey of 354 students attending a midsize rural university in Oregon during May, 2011. The main outcome was food insecurity measured using the US Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module: 6-Item Short Form. Socioeconomic and demographic variables were included in multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Over half of students (59%) were food insecure at some point during the previous year. Having fair/poor health (odds ratio [OR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.63), being employed (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.04-2.88), and having an income < $15,000/y (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.63) were associated with food insecurity. In turn, good academic performance (grade point average of ≥ 3.1) was inversely associated with food insecurity. CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity seems to be a significant issue for college students. It is necessary to expand research on different campus settings and further strengthen support systems to increase access to nutritious foods for this population.

Employment and family conditions are related to health care utilization among foreign-born farmworker men.

Despite their increased vulnerability to disease and injury, farmworkers have limited access to health services. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of employment and family conditions on health care utilization among foreign-born farmworker men. Using the Hispanic Farmworker Health model as the theoretical framework, a secondary data analysis was conducted among 397 foreign-born vineyard and winery worker men who attended the ¡Salud! Services mobile health screenings during the summer of 2009. Working full time (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49), being employed directly by the vineyard or winery (OR = 1.96), and having immediate family members (children, spouse) living in Oregon (OR = 2.65) were positively associated with health care utilization. Findings suggest that despite the many barriers farmworker men face, supportive employment and family conditions may increase health care utilization for this population. Implications of these results are discussed in the context of health care reform.

Migration, remittances, and health care utilization in Ecuador.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between migration and migrant remittances and health care utilization in Ecuador, and to identify any potential equalizing effects. METHODS: Using data from the 2004 National Demographic and Maternal & Child Health Survey (ENDEMAIN), a multilevel multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship of two migrant predictors (households with an international migrant; use of migrant remittances) with use of preventive care, number of curative visits, hospitalization, and use of antiparasitic medicines. Relevant predisposing, enabling, and need factors were included following Andersen's Model of Health Care Utilization Behavior. Interaction terms were included to assess the potential equalizing effects of migration and remittances by ethnicity, area of residence, and economic status. RESULTS: Migrant predictors were strongly associated with use of antiparasitic medicines, and to a lesser extent, with curative visits, even after adjusting for various predisposing, enabling, and need factors. Interaction models showed that having an international migrant increased use of these services among low-income Ecuadorians (quintiles 1 and 2). No significant relationship was found between migrant predictors and use of preventive services. CONCLUSIONS: Migration and remittances seem to have an equalizing effect on access to antiparasitic medicines, and to a lesser extent, curative health care services. Health care reform efforts should take into account the scope of this effect when developing public policy.

Migration, remittances, and health care utilization in Ecuador / Migración, remesas de dinero y utilización de los servicios de salud en el Ecuador

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between migration and migrant remittances and health care utilization in Ecuador, and to identify any potential equalizing effects. METHODS: Using data from the 2004 National Demographic and Maternal & Child Health Survey (ENDEMAIN), a multilevel multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship of two migrant predictors (households with an international migrant; use of migrant remittances) with use of preventive care, number of curative visits, hospitalization, and use of antiparasitic medicines. Relevant predisposing, enabling, and need factors were included following Andersen's Model of Health Care Utilization Behavior. Interaction terms were included to assess the potential equalizing effects of migration and remittances by ethnicity, area of residence, and economic status. RESULTS: Migrant predictors were strongly associated with use of antiparasitic medicines, and to a lesser extent, with curative visits, even after adjusting for various predisposing, enabling, and need factors. Interaction models showed that having an international migrant increased use of these services among low-income Ecuadorians (quintiles 1 and 2). No significant relationship was found between migrant predictors and use of preventive services. CONCLUSIONS: Migration and remittances seem to have an equalizing effect on access to antiparasitic medicines, and to a lesser extent, curative health care services. Health care reform efforts should take into account the scope of this effect when developing public policy.

OBJETIVO: Examinar la relación entre la migración, las remesas de dinero y la utilización de los servicios de atención de la salud en el Ecuador y determinar los posibles efectos equilibradores. MÉTODOS: A partir de los datos de la Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Materna e Infantil (ENDEMAIN) correspondientes al 2004, se efectuó un análisis multifactorial de varios niveles para evaluar la relación de dos factores predictivos de la migración (hogares con un migrante internacional; uso de remesas de dinero de migrantes) con el uso de los servicios de atención preventiva, el número de consultas para el tratamiento de enfermedades, la hospitalización y el uso de medicamentos antiparasitarios. Se incluyeron los factores predisponentes, mediadores y de necesidad percibida pertinentes según el Modelo de Andersen de Comportamientos de Utilización de los Servicios de Atención de la Salud. También se incluyeron términos de interacción para evaluar los posibles efectos equilibradores de la migración y las remesas por grupo étnico, área de residencia y nivel económico. RESULTADOS: Los factores predictivos de la migración se asociaron firmemente con el uso de medicamentos antiparasitarios y, en menor grado, con las consultas para el tratamiento de enfermedades, incluso después de ajustar los datos según diversos factores predisponentes, mediadores y de necesidad percibida. Los modelos de interacción demostraron que la presencia de un migrante internacional en el grupo familiar aumentaba el uso de estos servicios en los ecuatorianos de bajos ingresos (quintiles 1 y 2). No se encontró una relación significativa entre los factores predictivos de la migración y el uso de servicios preventivos. CONCLUSIONES: La migración y las remesas parecen tener un efecto equilibrador sobre el acceso a los medicamentos antiparasitarios y, en menor medida, sobre los servicios de atención de la salud relacionados con el tratamiento. Las actividades de reforma sanitaria deben tener en cuenta el alcance de este efecto en la elaboración de políticas públicas.

Use of health services among vineyard and winery workers in the North Willamette Valley, Oregon.

Although agricultural work is considered one of the most dangerous and physically demanding jobs, the majority of farmworkers remain vulnerable to disease and injury, while use of health services is limited. The present study analyzes the use of health care services among vineyard and winery workers in the North Willamette Valley, Oregon. Data from 513 foreign-born workers collected during the summer of 2009 by ¡Salud! Services, was used to test the influence of relevant predisposing and enabling factors of the Behavioral Model of Health Care Utilization among Vulnerable Populations. The majority of participants were males (87%) with an average age of 33 years. Over half of the workers were either married or living with a partner (54%) and had children living with them (58%). Very few spoke English (5%) and only a third had more than 6 years of formal education. Two-thirds of workers (65%) had a full time job and shared housing (67%). Only one of every five workers (19%) had health insurance. Multivariate analyses show that use of health services in the past 2 years is more likely among females, those who have children, have more than 6 years of education, work full time, are insured, and are currently attending school. This study provides further insight for health care provision initiatives to reduce the many barriers faced by farmworkers and their families.

Assessing the context of health care utilization in Ecuador: a spatial and multilevel analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies that have analyzed the context of health care utilization, particularly in Latin America. This study examines the context of utilization of health services in Ecuador; focusing on the relationship between provision of services and use of both preventive and curative services. METHODS: This study is cross-sectional and analyzes data from the 2004 National Demographic and Maternal & Child Health dataset. Provider variables come from the Ecuadorian System of Social Indicators (SIISE). Global Moran's I statistic is used to assess spatial autocorrelation of the provider variables. Multilevel modeling is used for the simultaneous analysis of provision of services at the province-level with use of services at the individual level. RESULTS: Spatial analysis indicates no significant differences in the density of health care providers among Ecuadorian provinces. After adjusting for various predisposing, enabling, need factors and interaction terms, density of public practice health personnel was positively associated with use of preventive care, particularly among rural households. On the other hand, density of private practice physicians was positively associated with use of curative care, particularly among urban households. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant public/private, urban/rural gaps in provision of services in Ecuador; which in turn affect people's use of services. It is necessary to strengthen the public health care delivery system (which includes addressing distribution of health workers) and national health information systems. These efforts could improve access to health care, and inform the civil society and policymakers on the advances of health care reform.