Assessment of the distribution of human and material resources for eye health in the public sector in Nampula, Mozambique.

BACKGROUND: The unavailability of human and material resources can affect access to eye health services, constituting an obstacle in the fight against avoidable visual impairment. This study aimed to assess the availability and distribution of human and material resources for eye health in the public sector in Nampula province. METHODS: A mixed method approach was used, which included document reviews (to extract information regarding the number of professionals and inhabitants in each district) and application of a questionnaire to heads of the ophthalmology department in each health facility (to obtain the list of available equipment). The ratios of eye health professionals per population in Nampula province and each of its districts were calculated and evaluated taking into account the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO). Based on the level of care of each health facility, the availability of equipment was evaluated. RESULTS: Nampula Province has not reached the recommended ratio of eye health professionals per population in the different categories (ophthalmic technicians with 0.8 per 100 thousand inhabitants; optometrists and ophthalmologists with 0.4 and 0.2 per 250 thousand inhabitants, respectively). Most districts of Nampula did not reach the recommended ratio in the three categories of professionals, except Nampula City (provincial capital). However, there was a greater concentration of professionals and facilities with eye health services in the provincial capital. Primary and secondary level health facilities lacked some equipment to provide eye health services within their scope. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unequal distribution of the workforce in Nampula and the centralization of surgical services at the Central Hospital of Nampula level. Therefore, there is a need to review resource distribution strategies and decentralization policy of eye health services in Nampula.

Assessment of cataract surgery outcomes in Nampula (Mozambique): visual acuity, visual function and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in surgical techniques, cataract remains the leading cause of preventable blindness, and massive surgeries have been adopted as a strategy to change this situation. Monitoring the results of cataract surgeries has become imperative to ensure their quality. Therefore, this study aims to assess the cataract surgery outcomes performed at the Central Hospital of Nampula Mozambique. METHODS: This is a prospective and longitudinal study in which translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the visual function (VF) and quality of life (QoL) questionnaire were performed. The appearance, content, construct, criterion, internal consistency and responsiveness were validated using the most common methods and indicators. Visual acuity (VA), VF and QoL were evaluated on 447 patients before and after surgery by t-test and effect sizes. RESULTS: VF and QoL questionnaires showed one-dimension, good values of TLI (0.973, 0.951) and SRMR (0.057, 0.054), and for each item, weights > 0.7, H2 > 0.5, ranges > 5.8 and the RMSEA < 0.08. Correlations for criterion validity were high and for responsiveness were high for QoL and moderate for VF one and the ordinal Cronbach's alpha coefficients were greater than 0.97. Difference between VA, VF and QoL before and after surgery was statistically significant (p < 0.001). After surgery, 74.3% of patients had good, 23.5% had borderline and 2.2% had poor VA. CONCLUSIONS: The cataract surgery outcomes are outside the WHO recommendations regarding VA, but they have had a great impact on improving VF and QoL. The questionnaires showed excellent psychometric properties and should be used in daily clinical practice to evaluate the results of cataract surgeries.

Contrast Sensitivity Assessment in Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this systematic review was to study whether contrast sensitivity assessment in people with diabetes could be a reliable test in early detection of diabetic retinopathy. A systematic search based on population, intervention, comparison, and outcome strategy was performed. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English articles of human patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and contrast sensitivity measurements as domain studied. RESULTS: Twentyone comparative cross-sectional studies were included. All of them showed significant loss of contrast sensitivity in people with diabetes and diabetic retinopathy regarding control patients of the same age, regardless of the method used. However, those without diabetic retinopathy, involve a loss of contrast sensitivity, although not always significant. CONCLUSION: Changes in contrast sensitivity suggest that there is damage to the retina prior to the vascular ones and that they could be detected by this test.