Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 107(4): 845-849, 2022 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35970285

RESUMO

Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial to prevent its spread. This study aimed to document test sensitivity/specificity, correlation with cycle threshold value from polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fitness-for-use in different populations and settings, and user perspectives that could inform large-scale implementation. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a rapid antigen detection test, BD Veritor, and compared this (and another rapid test, Standard Q) against reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in terms of sensitivity and specificity in 130 symptomatic and 130 asymptomatic adults. In addition, we evaluated the suitability and ease of use of the BD Veritor test in a subsample of study participants (n = 42) and implementers (n = 5). At 95% confidence interval, the sensitivity of the BD Veritor and Standard Q test were 70% and 63% in symptomatic and 87% and 73% in asymptomatic individuals, respectively, regarding positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results. Overall, the BD Veritor test was 78% sensitive and 99.5% specific compared with RT-PCR irrespective of the cycle threshold. This warrants large field evaluation as well as use of the rapid antigen test for quick assessment of SARS-CoV-2 for containment of epidemics in the country.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Antígenos Virais , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 11(6): 257-266, 2022 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35333347

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric international travelers account for nearly half of measles importations in the United States. Over one third of pediatric international travelers depart the United States without the recommended measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations: 2 doses for travelers ≥12 months and 1 dose for travelers 6 to <12 months. METHODS: We developed a model to compare 2 strategies among a simulated cohort of international travelers (6 months to <6 years): (1) No pretravel health encounter (PHE): travelers depart with baseline MMR vaccination status; (2) PHE: MMR-eligible travelers are offered vaccination. All pediatric travelers experience a destination-specific risk of measles exposure (mean, 30 exposures/million travelers). If exposed to measles, travelers' age and MMR vaccination status determine the risk of infection (range, 3%-90%). We included costs of medical care, contact tracing, and lost wages from the societal perspective. We varied inputs in sensitivity analyses. Model outcomes included projected measles cases, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ($/quality-adjusted life year [QALY], cost-effectiveness threshold ≤$100 000/QALY). RESULTS: Compared with no PHE, PHE would avert 57 measles cases at $9.2 million/QALY among infant travelers and 7 measles cases at $15.0 million/QALY among preschool-aged travelers. Clinical benefits of PHE would be greatest for infants but cost-effective only for travelers to destinations with higher risk for measles exposure (ie, ≥160 exposures/million travelers) or if more US-acquired cases resulted from an infected traveler, such as in communities with limited MMR coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Pretravel MMR vaccination provides the greatest clinical benefit for infant travelers and can be cost-effective before travel to destinations with high risk for measles exposure or from communities with low MMR vaccination coverage.


Assuntos
Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Lactente , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação
3.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250446, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886672

RESUMO

Interventional studies targeting environment enteropathy (EE) are impeded by the lack of appropriate, validated, non-invasive biomarkers of EE. Thus, we aimed to validate the association of potential biomarkers for EE with enteric infections and nutritional status in a longitudinal birth cohort study. We measured endotoxin core antibody (EndoCab) and soluble CD14 (sCD14) in serum, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in feces using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. We found that levels of serum EndoCab and sCD14 increase with the cumulative incidence of enteric infections. We observed a significant correlation between the fecal MPO level in the children at 24 months of age with the total number of bacterial and viral infections, the total number of parasitic infections, and the total number of diarrheal episodes and diarrheal duration. We observed that the levels of serum EndoCab, sCD14, and fecal MPO at 3 months of age were significantly associated with whether children were malnourished at 18 months of age or not. Biomarkers such as fecal MPO, serum EndoCab and sCD14 in children at an early age may be useful as a measure of cumulative burden of preceding enteric infections, which are predictive of subsequent malnutrition status and may be useful non-invasive biomarkers for EE.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Diarreia/sangue , Gastroenteropatias/sangue , Doenças Parasitárias/sangue , Peroxidase/sangue , Anticorpos/sangue , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Diarreia/microbiologia , Diarreia/parasitologia , Diarreia/virologia , Endotoxinas/sangue , Fezes/microbiologia , Fezes/parasitologia , Fezes/virologia , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/microbiologia , Gastroenteropatias/parasitologia , Gastroenteropatias/virologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/patologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Receptores de Lipopolissacarídeos/sangue , Masculino , Estado Nutricional , Doenças Parasitárias/microbiologia , Doenças Parasitárias/parasitologia , Doenças Parasitárias/virologia , Viroses/sangue , Viroses/virologia
4.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 14(4): 494-503, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32660664

RESUMO

The co-occurrence of the 2020 Atlantic hurricane season and the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic creates complex dilemmas for protecting populations from these intersecting threats. Climate change is likely contributing to stronger, wetter, slower-moving, and more dangerous hurricanes. Climate-driven hazards underscore the imperative for timely warning, evacuation, and sheltering of storm-threatened populations - proven life-saving protective measures that gather evacuees together inside durable, enclosed spaces when a hurricane approaches. Meanwhile, the rapid acquisition of scientific knowledge regarding how COVID-19 spreads has guided mass anti-contagion strategies, including lockdowns, sheltering at home, physical distancing, donning personal protective equipment, conscientious handwashing, and hygiene practices. These life-saving strategies, credited with preventing millions of COVID-19 cases, separate and move people apart. Enforcement coupled with fear of contracting COVID-19 have motivated high levels of adherence to these stringent regulations. How will populations react when warned to shelter from an oncoming Atlantic hurricane while COVID-19 is actively circulating in the community? Emergency managers, health care providers, and public health preparedness professionals must create viable solutions to confront these potential scenarios: elevated rates of hurricane-related injury and mortality among persons who refuse to evacuate due to fear of COVID-19, and the resurgence of COVID-19 cases among hurricane evacuees who shelter together.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Tempestades Ciclônicas/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Oceano Atlântico/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/mortalidade , Mudança Climática , Tempestades Ciclônicas/mortalidade , Tempestades Ciclônicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Abrigo de Emergência/métodos , Abrigo de Emergência/tendências , Humanos , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública/instrumentação , Saúde Pública/métodos , Saúde Pública/tendências , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Gestão de Riscos/tendências
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(2): 306-315, 2019 07 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30312374

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measles importations and the subsequent spread from US travelers returning from abroad are responsible for most measles cases in the United States. Increasing measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination among departing US travelers could reduce the clinical impact and costs of measles in the United States. METHODS: We designed a decision tree to evaluate MMR vaccination at a pretravel health encounter (PHE), compared with no encounter. We derived input parameters from Global TravEpiNet data and literature. We quantified Riskexposure to measles while traveling and the average number of US-acquired cases and contacts due to a measles importation. In sensitivity analyses, we examined the impact of destination-specific Riskexposure, including hot spots with active measles outbreaks; the percentage of previously-unvaccinated travelers; and the percentage of travelers returning to US communities with heterogeneous MMR coverage. RESULTS: The no-encounter strategy projected 22 imported and 66 US-acquired measles cases, costing $14.8M per 10M travelers. The PHE strategy projected 15 imported and 35 US-acquired cases at $190.3M per 10M travelers. PHE was not cost effective for all international travelers (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] $4.6M/measles case averted), but offered better value (ICER <$100 000/measles case averted) or was even cost saving for travelers to hot spots, especially if travelers were previously unvaccinated or returning to US communities with heterogeneous MMR coverage. CONCLUSIONS: PHEs that improve MMR vaccination among US international travelers could reduce measles cases, but are costly. The best value is for travelers with a high likelihood of measles exposure, especially if the travelers are previously unvaccinated or will return to US communities with heterogeneous MMR coverage.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/economia , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/economia , Sarampo/economia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Doença Relacionada a Viagens , Adulto , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(12): 1768-1772, 2017 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28369324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND.: In modern academic medicine, especially in the fields of infectious diseases and global health, aspiring physician-scientists often wait years before achieving independence as basic, translational, and clinical investigators. This study employed mixed methods to evaluate the success of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund/American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (BWF/ASTMH) global health postdoctoral fellowship in promoting scientific independence. METHODS.: We examined quantitative data obtained from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and qualitative data provided by the ASTMH and program participants to assess BWF/ASTMH trainees' success in earning NIH grants, publishing manuscripts, and gaining faculty positions. We also calculated the return on investment (ROI) associated with the training program by dividing direct costs of NIH research grants awarded to trainees by the direct costs invested by the BWF/ASTMH fellowship. RESULTS.: Forty-one trainees received fellowships between 2001 and 2015. Within 3 years of completing their fellowships, 21 of 35 (60%) had received career development awards, and within 5 years, 12 of 26 (46%) had received independent research awards. Overall, 22 of 35 (63%) received 1 or more research awards. BWF/ASTMH recipients with at least 3 years of follow-up data had coauthored a mean of 36 publications (range, 2-151) and 29 of 35 (82%) held academic positions. The return on investment was 11.9 overall and 31.8 for fellowships awarded between 2001 and 2004. CONCLUSIONS.: Between 2001 and 2015, the BWF/ASTMH postdoctoral training program successfully facilitated progress to scientific independence. This program model underscores the importance of custom-designed postdoctoral training as a bridge to NIH awards and professional autonomy.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Saúde Global/educação , Medicina Tropical/educação , Pesquisa Biomédica , Bolsas de Estudo/economia , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares , Editoração , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Estados Unidos
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 58(1): 11-21, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24014735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pretravel health consultations help international travelers manage travel-related illness risks through education, vaccination, and medication. This study evaluated costs and benefits of that portion of the health consultation associated with malaria prevention provided to US travelers bound for West Africa. METHODS: The estimated change in disease risk and associated costs and benefits resulting from traveler adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis were calculated from 2 perspectives: the healthcare payer's and the traveler's. We used data from the Global TravEpiNet network of US travel clinics that collect de-identified pretravel data for international travelers. Disease risk and chemoprophylaxis effectiveness were estimated from published medical reports. Direct medical costs were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and published literature. RESULTS: We analyzed 1029 records from January 2009 to January 2011. Assuming full adherence to chemoprophylaxis regimens, consultations saved healthcare payers a per-traveler average of $14 (9-day trip) to $372 (30-day trip). For travelers, consultations resulted in a range of net cost of $20 (9-day trip) to a net savings of $32 (30-day trip). Differences were mostly driven by risk of malaria in the destination country. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that healthcare payers save money for short- and longer-term trips, and that travelers save money for longer trips when travelers adhere to malaria recommendations and prophylactic regimens in West Africa. This is a potential incentive to healthcare payers to offer consistent pretravel preventive care to travelers. This financial benefit complements the medical benefit of reducing the risk of malaria.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/economia , Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção/economia , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Malária/economia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Viagem , África Ocidental , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA