Assessment of arsenic surface contamination in a museum anthropology department.

OBJECTIVE: To assess potential arsenic (As) contamination of work surfaces to improve upon the control strategy at an anthropology department in a large natural history museum. METHODS: Work practices were observed and control strategy reviewed to inform an occupational hygiene assessment strategy utilizing surface wipe sampling. A total of 35 sampling targets were identified, focusing on surfaces that receive high touch traffic, including workstations, artifact transport carts, and elevator buttons. Arsenic sampling and analysis were performed using reference method Occupational Safety and Health Administration ID-125G. RESULTS: Four of the sampling areas returned detectable levels of As, ranging from 0.052 to 0.350 µg/100 cm. CONCLUSION: Workplace observations and wipe sampling data enabled the development of recommendations to help to further reduce potential occupational exposure to As. Continuous reduction of surface contamination is prudent for known human carcinogens.

An assessment of the occupational hazards related to medical lasers.

OBJECTIVE: Occupational hazards associated with medical laser applications remain poorly understood and uncharacterized. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, and all articles relevant to beam and nonbeam medical laser hazards were reviewed. The Rockwell Laser Industries Laser Accident Database was searched for medical laser injuries and abstracted. RESULTS: Eye injuries, skin burns, injuries related to the onset of fires, and electric shock have been reported in relation to medical laser use. It is probable that both acute and chronic health effects have been experienced by medical personnel as the result of exposure to laser generated air contaminants. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the clinical benefits they provide, the growth of laser technologies and applications are anticipated to result in an increase in the number and type of medical personnel with future exposure to laser hazards.

Long-term health experience of jet engine manufacturing workers: IV. A comparison of central nervous system cancer ascertainment using mortality and incidence data.

PURPOSE: To compare ascertainment of central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms with the use of mortality and incidence data as part of an occupational epidemiology study. METHODS: Deaths were identified by matching the cohort of 223,894 jet engine manufacturing employees to the U.S. Social Security Administration death files and the National Death Index. Incident cancer cases were identified by matching the cohort to 19 state cancer registries. RESULTS: We identified 718 cases overall: 59% by the use of both mortality and cancer incidence tracing; 24% by the use of only mortality tracing, and 17% by the use of only cancer incidence tracing. Compared with state cancer registries, death certificates missed 38% of the malignant, more than six times the benign and nearly 1.5 times the unspecified CNS cases. The positive predictive value of death certificates, with cancer registry as gold standard, was 6% for unspecified, 35% for benign, and 86% for malignant histologies. CONCLUSIONS: Death certificates seriously underascertained benign and unspecified CNS tumors; analyses determined with mortality data would not accurately capture the true extent of disease among the cohort. Most state cancer registries have only collected nonmalignant CNS tumor information since 2004, which currently limits the usefulness of state cancer registries as a source of nonmalignant CNS tumor identification. Underascertainment of CNS deaths could seriously affect interpretation of results, more so if examining nonmalignant CNS.

Effectiveness of community health workers for promoting use of safety eyewear by Latino farm workers.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate The Community Health Worker "promotor de salud" (CHW) model is evaluated as a tool for reducing eye injuries in Latino farm workers. METHODS: In 2001, 786 workers on 34 farms were divided into three intervention blocks: (A) CHWs provided protective eyewear and training to farm workers; (B) CHWs provided eyewear but no training to farm workers; (C) eyewear was distributed to farm workers with no CHW present and no training. RESULTS: Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires demonstrated greater self-reported use of eyewear in all blocks after the intervention (P < 0.0001), with Block A showing the greatest change compared to B (P < 0.0001) and C (P = 0.03); this was supported by field observations. Block A showed the greatest improvement in knowledge on questions related to training content. CONCLUSION: CHWs were an effective tool to train farm workers in eye health and safety, improving the use of personal protective equipment and knowledge.