The Sustained Value of an Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic in the Management of Early Pregnancy Complications: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the sustained value of an early pregnancy assessment clinic (EPAC) in the management of early pregnancy complications and its effect on the incidence emergency room (ER) visits. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective study (January 2006 to December 2015) was conducted. The number of patients assessed, sources and reasons for referral, and treatments provided were reviewed. The numbers of ER assessments and reassessments for abortion, hemorrhage, and ectopic pregnancy from January 2004 to December 2005 (pre-EPAC) and January 2006 to December 2015 (post-EPAC) were also reviewed. RESULTS: There were 11 349 new referrals and 10 764 follow-up visits. The reasons for referral were threatened miscarriage (n = 3568, 31.4%), missed miscarriage (n = 3056, 26.9%), incomplete miscarriage (n = 1064, 9.4%), complete miscarriage (n = 991, 8.7%), ectopic pregnancy (n = 857, 7.6%), hyperemesis gravidarum (n = 139, 1.2%), and others (n = 1674, 14.8%). There has been a significant decreasing trend (tau = -0.60, P = 0.0127) and a significant decrease in the post-EPAC rate of ER reassessments (P = 0.0396) for hemorrhage, with a concomitant decrease in EPAC visits for hemorrhage. In addition, there has been a significant increasing trend (tau = 0.64, P = 0.0081) and a significant increase in the post-EPAC rate of ER assessments (P = 0.00001) for ectopic pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Over the 10-year period, the EPAC has remained a vital service for managing early pregnancy complications for women. However, the clinic has not yet had a sustained impact on ER visits for miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and hemorrhage. It is possible that a reduction in ER assessments and reassessments for early pregnancy complications can be achieved through a clinic with daily access.

A Comparison of the Number of Patient Visits Required for Different Management Options for Early Pregnancy Loss at an Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the total number of patient visits required for the conservative, medical, or surgical management of early pregnancy loss in an early pregnancy assessment clinic (EPAC). METHODS: A retrospective study of the number of patient visits at an EPAC for conservative, medical, or surgical management of early spontaneous abortion from October 2013 to September 2015 was undertaken. Visits counted included initial assessment, follow-up visits, and surgery date, if separate from a clinic visit. RESULTS: A total of 945 patients were seen, with 2144 visits during the study period. Conservative management required an average of 3.01 visits (n = 159, median = 3, SD = 1.16, range [1,7]) and misoprostol treatment required an average of 2.51 visits (n = 329, median = 2, SD = 0.83, range [1,6]) to achieve a complete abortion. Dilatation and curettage (D&C) required an average of 1.60 visits (n = 417, median = 1, SD = 0.80, range [1-6]), when including scheduling limitations or an average of 1.13 visits when excluding these limitations. The difference in the number of visits required for the three management options was statistically significant (P <0.0001). Management with D&C was more likely to require less than two visits to achieve complete abortion compared with the other options (93.8% for D&C vs. 64.5% for misoprostol vs. 37.8% for conservative). CONCLUSION: An EPAC provides a significant value in the management of early pregnancy losses. There is a significant difference in the total number of visits required for different treatment options. Patients may find this information helpful when considering and deciding upon their preferred treatment option.

Is pathology examination useful after early surgical abortion?

OBJECTIVE: To study if the pathologist's examination of surgical abortion tissue offers more information than immediate fresh tissue examination by the surgeon. Immediate examination of the fresh tissue aspirate after surgical abortion helps reduce the risk of failed abortion and other complications. Regulations in some states also require a pathologist to analyze abortion specimens at added cost to providers. We conducted this study to evaluate the incremental clinical benefit of pathology examination after surgical abortion at less than 6 weeks' gestation. METHODS: As part of a prospective case series of women who had early surgical abortions at the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts during a 32-month period, we collected data on clinical outcomes and the results of postoperative tissue examinations. Using outcomes verified by in-person follow-up as the "gold standard," we calculated the validity of the tissue examinations by the surgeons and the outside pathologists. RESULTS: A total of 676 women had documented outcomes and complete tissue examination data. The sensitivity (ability of the examiner to detect an outcome other than complete abortion) was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35, 76) for the surgeons' tissue inspections and 22% (95% CI 8, 44) for the pathologists' examinations. The predictive value of a positive (abnormal) tissue screen was 14% (95% CI 8, 24) and 7% (95% CI 3, 17) for the surgeons and pathologists, respectively. CONCLUSION: Routine pathology examination of the tissue aspirate after early surgical abortion confers no incremental clinical benefit. Although the surgeons' tissue inspections predicted abnormal outcomes poorly, the pathologists did no better. Our results challenge the rationale for state regulations requiring pathologic analysis of all surgical abortion specimens.