Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 28(4): 301-306, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A benchmark study was conducted in the southwest of France, in the New Aquitaine region, to investigate metabolic outcomes and availability of resources in pediatric diabetes units. We assessed whether the level of care was in accordance with the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes recommendations. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were collected, as were all HbA1c tests for the 2017 calendar year. Pediatricians specialized in diabetes care were invited to complete an online survey concerning means allocated to the management of type 1 diabetes in their centers. RESULTS: Sixteen centers provided data for 1277 patients and 3873 clinical visits. A total of 1115 children suffering from diabetes for more than 1 year were studied. Median HbA1c was 8% (7.4-8.6) for the whole region. Only 29.2% of children had good metabolic control in accordance with the <7.5% target. We identified slight but significant variation in glycemic control among centers (P=0.029). The use of an insulin pump varied greatly among centers but did not explain HbA1c differences. We did not identify a correlation between medical or paramedical time dedicated to the follow-up of diabetic patients and the mean HbA1c of each center. For 100 diabetic patients, follow-up was provided by 0.42 physicians (0.23-1.50), 0.15 nurses (0-0.56), 0.12 dietitians (0-0.48), and 0.07 psychologists (0-0.30). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a lack of human resources allocated to the management of type 1 diabetes in the region that is far below international recommendations. The proportion of children achieving the international glycemic target is low. There is a clear need to improve glycemic control in children, which will only be possible with improved professional practices, encouraged by benchmark studies, and by increasing the size of our multidisciplinary teams.


Assuntos
Benchmarking/métodos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Prog Urol ; 22(8): 482-6, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22732584

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the flow rate obtained by catheters used in self intermittent catheterization. MATERIAL: In vitro comparative study designed to compare the average flow rate obtained by intravesical catheters, by repeated flowmetric measures. The catheters studied were the most used in France in Fr10, 12 and 14 for female catheters and in Fr12, 14 and 16 for male catheters. RESULTS: We observed a strict relationship between Charriere and flow rate, both in female and male catheters These results were statistically significant (P<0.05). For female catheters, the average flow rate varied from 2.83 to 3.7 mL/s for Fr10 catheters, from 4.31 to 5.35 mL/s for Fr12 catheters and from 7.00 to 7.85 mL/s for Fr14 catheters (P<0.05). For male catheters, the average flow rate varied from 4.53 to 5.00 mL/s for Fr12 catheters, from 6.95 to 8.17 mL/s for Fr14 catheters and from 10.4 to 11.07 mL/s for Fr16 catheters (P<0.05). In female and male population, despite the observed flow rate differences between catheters, there were no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a better flow rate when Charriere increases. Thus, an objective adaptation of self catheterization's materiel is possible when the patient wishes to improve flow rate in order to reduce self intermittent catheterization duration.


Assuntos
Catéteres , Cateterismo Urinário , Micção/fisiologia , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reologia , Autocuidado
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA