Pharmacogenetic guided versus standard warfarin dosing for routine clinical care with its pharmacoeconomic impact: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Empirical use of pharmacogenetic test(PGT) is advocated for many drugs, and resource-rich setting hospitals are using the same commonly. The clinical translation of pharmacogenetic tests in terms of cost and clinical utility is yet to be examined in hospitals of low middle income countries (LMICs). AIM: The present study assessed the clinical utility of PGT by comparing the pharmacogenetically(PGT) guided- versus standard of care(SOC)- warfarin therapy, including the health economics of the two warfarin therapies. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial recruited warfarin-receiving patients in pharmacogenetically(PGT) guided- versus standard of care(SOC)- study arms. Pharmacogenetic analysis of CYP2C9*2(rs1799853), CYP2C9*3(rs1057910) and VKORC1(rs9923231) was performed for patients recruited to the PGT-guided arm. PT(Prothrombin Time)-INR(international normalized ratio) testing and dose titrations were allowed as per routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was the percent time spent in the therapeutic INR range(TTR) during the 90-day observation period. Secondary endpoints were time to reach therapeutic INR(TRT), the proportion of adverse events, and economic comparison between two modes of therapy in a Markov model built for the commonest warfarin indication- atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: The study enrolled 168 patients, 84 in each arm. Per-protocol analysis showed a significantly high median time spent in therapeutic INR in the genotype-guided arm(42.85%; CI 21.4-66.75) as compared to the SOC arm(8.8%; CI 0-27.2)(p < 0.00001). The TRT was less in the PG-guided warfarin dosing group than the standard-of-care dosing warfarin group (17.85 vs. 33.92 days) (p = 0.002). Bleeding and thromboembolic events were similar in the two study groups. Lifetime expenditure was ₹1,26,830 in the PGT arm compared to ₹1,17,907 in the SOC arm. The QALY gain did not differ in the two groups(3.9 vs. 3.65). Compared to SOC, the incremental cost-utility ratio was ₹35,962 per QALY gain with PGT test opting. In deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the base case results were found to be insensitive to the variation in model parameters. In the cost-effectiveness-acceptability curve analysis, a 90% probability of cost-effectiveness was reached at a willingness-to-pay(WTP) of ₹ 71,630 well below one time GDP threshold of WTP used. CONCLUSION: Clinical efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of the warfarin pharmacogenetic test suggest its routine use as a point of care investigation for patient care in LMICs.

Factors Impacting Return to Work/School among Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors in India.

Introduction: While there are data about return to work after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in survivors from resource-rich regions, similar data from resource-challenged settings are scarce. This study assessed the incidence of and factors affecting return to work/school (RTW) among HCT survivors in India. Methods: This single-center cross-sectional study was conducted at the long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinic of a large-volume HCT center during 2022-2023. HCT survivors surviving beyond four months were included after obtaining informed consent. Patients' sociodemographic, disease, HCT, and work details were recorded. The factors affecting RTW were evaluated using univariate (ANOVA) and logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 126 HCT survivors participated in the study. Of these, 34 (27%) did not RTW, 47 (37%) returned to part-time work, and 45 (36%) returned to full-time work at a median of more than three years post-HCT. The three groups did not significantly differ in age, sex, or marital status. The univariate analysis revealed that education, pre-HCT job status, income, and conditioning intensity were significantly associated with RTW. Logistic regression analysis revealed that survivors with a higher (taxable) income were more likely to RTW than those with a lower (non-taxable) income (OR 3.5; CI 1.2-10.2, p=0.01). Survivors with a desk job were more likely to RTW than those who were unemployed/retired or students (OR 4.5; CI 1.1-18.0, p=0.03). Conclusion: Socioeconomic factors, like pre-HCT job status and income, were significantly associated with post-HCT RTW. Therefore, there is a need to integrate multidisciplinary RTW programs for HCT survivors in India.

Bleeding risk assessment in immune thrombocytopenia.

The bleeding risk in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is related not only to low platelet count but also to the presence of platelet dysfunction. However, diagnosing a concomitant platelet dysfunction is challenging as most of the available platelet function assays (PFAs) require a platelet count of greater than 100,000/µL. Sonoclot coagulation and platelet function analyzer works on the principle of viscoelastometry, and results remain unaffected by the platelet counts. To assess the platelet function in adult acute ITP patients with the help of sonoclot coagulation and platelet function analyzer and correlate it with the risk of bleeding. Newly diagnosed acute ITP patients with a platelet count less than 20,000/µL were divided into two groups based on WHO bleeding grade: ITP non-bleeder (ITP-NB) group (WHO bleeding grade ≤1) and ITP bleeder (ITP-B) group (WHO bleeding grade ≥2). Platelet function was assessed by sonoclot in both groups. The patients without significant bleeding (ITP-NB) were followed up monthly for six months with the assessment of platelet function during each contact. Eighty patients (30 ITP-B and 50 ITP-NB) were prospectively included in this study. The median age of patients in the two groups was 37 years and 30 years, respectively. The female-to-male ratio was 4:1 and 1:1 in ITP-B and ITP-NB groups. The median platelet count in ITP-B and ITP-NB was 12000/µL (range 1000-19000/µL) and 8000/µL (range 1000-19000/µL), respectively. Mean platelet functions by sonoclot in both groups were lower than the normal cut-off (>1.6). However, the mean platelet function in the ITP-B group (0.2 + 0.17) was significantly lower than the ITP-NB group (1.2 ± 0.52) (p = 0.01). During the follow-up period of 6 months, patients in ITP-NB with a normal platelet function (>1.6) on sonoclot had lesser episodes (one episode) of clinically significant bleeding than patients with a low platelet function (4 episodes). Patients with acute severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding phenotype have a greater abnormality on platelet function by sonoclot than patients with non-bleeding phenotype. This information may help in taking therapeutic decisions in patients with acute ITP.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Long-Term Outcomes in ≥1 Year Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors: A CIBMTR Analysis.

Racial/ethnic minorities have demonstrated worse survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) compared to whites. Whether the racial disparity in HCT outcomes persists in long-term survivors and possibly may be even exacerbated in this population, which frequently transitions back from the transplant center to their local healthcare providers, is unknown. In the current study, we compared long-term outcomes among 1-year allogeneic HCT survivors by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database was used to identify 5473 patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes who underwent their first allogeneic HCT between 2007 and 2017 and were alive and in remission for at least 1 year after transplantation. The study was restricted to patients who underwent HCT in the United States. SES was defined using patient neighborhood poverty level estimated from the recipient's ZIP code of residence; a ZIP code with ≥20% of persons below the federal poverty level was considered a high poverty area. The primary outcome was to evaluate the associations of race/ethnicity and neighborhood poverty level with overall survival (OS), relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Cox regression models were used to determine associations of ethnicity/race and SES with OS, relapse, and NRM. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated to compare mortality rates of the study patients and their general population peers matched on race/ethnicity, age, and sex. The study cohort was predominately non-Hispanic white (n = 4385) and also included non-Hispanic black (n = 338), Hispanic (n = 516), and Asian (n = 234) patients. Overall, 729 patients (13%) resided in high-poverty areas. Significantly larger proportions of non-Hispanic black (37%) and Hispanic (26%) patients lived in high-poverty areas compared to non-Hispanic whites (10%) and Asians (10%) (P < .01). Multivariable analysis revealed no significant associations between OS, PFS, relapse, or NRM and race/ethnicity or poverty level when adjusted for patient-, disease- and transplantation-related covariates. Our retrospective cohort registry study shows that among adult allogeneic HCT recipients who survived at least 1 year in remission, there were no associations between race/ethnicity, neighborhood poverty level, and long-term outcomes.

Generic ibrutinib a potential cost-effective strategy for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Though the chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) management options in India are still limited compared to the novel drug options in resource-rich settings, the availability of less costly generics and the government health insurance scheme has enabled many patients to access the newer drugs in India. The current study compared the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of existing initial management options for the progression-free survival (PFS) time horizon from the patient's perspective. A two-health-state, PFS and progressive disease, Markov model was assumed for three regimens (generics): ibrutinib monotherapy, bendamustine-rituximab (B-R), and rituximab-chlorambucil (RClb) used as the frontline treatment of CLL patients in India. All costs, utilization of services, and consequences data during the PFS period were collected from interviewing patients during follow-up visits. The transition probability (TP) and average PFS information were obtained from landmark published studies. EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were utilized to assess the quality of life (QoL). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were measured during the PFS period. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were studied. Upon analysis, the entire monetary expense during the PFS time was ₹1581964 with ibrutinib, ₹171434 with B-R, and ₹91997 with RClb treatment arm. Pooled PFS and QALY gain was 10.33 and 8.28 years for ibrutinib, 4.08 and 3.53 years for the B-R regimen, and 1.33 and 1.23 years in RClb arms, respectively. Ibrutinib's ICER and ICUR were ₹214587.32 per PFS year gain and ₹282384.86 per QALY gain when assessed against the B-R regimen. Ibrutinib also performed better in ICER and ICUR against the RClb arm with ₹157014.29 per PFS year gain and ₹200413.6 per QALY gain. In conclusion, generic ibrutinib is a cost-effective initial line of management compared to other commonly used treatment regimes in resource-limited settings.

Utility of eGVHD App for bedside GVHD assessment in a high-volume BMT center.

Assessing acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is challenging because there are several classification systems. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the Center for International Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry task force recommends using the eGVHD application (App) to score acute GVHD according to the Mount Sinai Acute GvHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria and chronic GVHD according to the National Institutes of Health 2014 criteria. We prospectively used the eGVHD App at each follow-up visit in a large-volume bone-marrow transplant center in India from 2017 to 2021. We retrospectively evaluated the discrepancy in scoring GVHD severity by physicians not using the App from the same patient charts. The App user satisfaction and experience were recorded using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). In 100 consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients, there was more discrepancy in scoring the severity of chronic GVHD (38%) than acute GVHD (9%) without using the App. The median TAM and PSSUQ scores were six (IQR:1) and two (IQR:1), respectively, indicating high perceived usefulness and user satisfaction. The eGVHD App is an excellent learning tool for hematology/BMT fellows and helps manage GVHD in high-volume BMT centers.

Development and validation wise assessment of genotype guided warfarin dosing algorithm in Indian population.

OBJECTIVES: A study was conducted to develop and validate the warfarin pharmacogenetic dose optimization algorithm considering the clinical pharmacogenetic implementation consortium (CPIC) recommendations for the Asian ethnicity population. METHODS: The present prospective observational study recruited warfarin-receiving patients. We collected a three ml blood sample for VKORC1, CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, and CYP4F2 polymorphism assessment during the follow-up visits. Clinical history, sociodemographic and warfarin dose details were noted. RESULTS: The study recruited 300 patients (250 in derivation and 50 in validation timed cohort) receiving warfarin therapy. The baseline characteristics were similar in both cohorts. BMI, presence of comorbidity, VKORC1, CYP2C9*2, and CYP2C9*3 were identified as covariates significantly affecting the warfarin weekly maintenance dose (p<0.001 for all) and the same were included in warfarin pharmacogenetic dose optimization algorithm building. The algorithm built-in the present study showed a good correlation with Gage (r=0.57, p<0.0001), and IWPC (r=0.51, p<0.0001) algorithms, widely accepted in western side of the globe. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a sensitivity of 73 %, a positive predictive value of 96 %, and a specificity of 89 %. The algorithm correctly identified the validation cohort's warfarin-sensitive, intermediate reacting, and resistant patient populations. CONCLUSIONS: Validation and comparisons of the warfarin pharmacogenetic dose optimization algorithm have made it ready for the clinical trial assessment.

Development of an interview-based warfarin nomogram predicting the time spent in the therapeutic INR range: A cost-effective, and non-invasive strategy building from a cross sectional study in a low resource setting.

A cross-sectional study was conducted to predict time in therapeutic range (TTR) using clinical history, examination, and socioeconomic data. Study included warfarin-receiving patients from outpatient-clinic. In 203 patients studied, mean warfarin start-dose was 2.55 mg/day and maintenance-dose/week was 30.79 mg. Body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.03), warfarin maintenance dose/day (p = 0.02), and comorbidity presence (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with TTR. Occupation (p = 0.53), income (p = 0.83), education (p = 0.55), and socioeconomic score (p = 0.73) showed non-significant association with TTR. A TTR predicting nomogram was built from clinical history and examination findings.

A systematic review of economic evaluations of treatment regimens in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The expansion of advanced expensive therapeutic innovations for Multiple Myeloma (MM) led to increased disclosure of economic evaluations. The present analysis systematically reviewed and appraised the reporting quality of economic evaluations in MM. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature search in Ovid, MEDLINE(R), PubMed, and Cochrane libraries was conducted for studies published in the past decade. Two independent authors performed study selection and data extraction in a standardized form. Study methodological quality assessment was performed using 10-item Drummond's tool. RESULTS: Of potentially eligible 1150 retrieved studies, 17 met eligibility criteria. Six evaluations (35%) were in newly diagnosed MM and 11 (65%) in relapse refractory (RR) MM. Nine studies (53%) embraced the payer's perspective, five (29%) adopted health care system, one (6%) societal and two did not report. Six (35%) employed partitioned survival model, 4(24%) discrete event simulation, 4(24%) Markov model and 2(12%) used decision tree model. The methodological quality has improved significantly; 16 (94%) studies comprehended a well-defined question by affirming the analysis perspective and examined both costs and outcomes while 13 (71%) provided a comprehensive description of competing alternatives. CONCLUSION: The addition of novel drugs to the treatment armamentarium of MM is considerably cost-effective. The evaluations became more frequent, methodological quality has improved in the last decade.

Reduced Dose Ibrutinib Due to Financial Toxicity in CLL.

Ibrutinib is the only approved novel agent that is available for the treatment of relapsed-refractory and treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with deletion 17p or TP53 mutation in India. The cost of ibrutinib is still prohibitive for most Indian CLL patients. We report here for the first time dose reductions due to the patient preference of financial toxicity. We prospectively followed up patients of CLL receiving ibrutinib at a tertiary referral center in India. The period of study was from April 2016 to April 2018. Reduced dose ibrutinib was defined as a sustained (≥ 12 months) dosing at < 420 mg/day, either at treatment initiation or within 3 months from starting therapy. Progression free survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. There were a total of three patients on reduced dose and twelve patients on standard dose ibrutinib. Two patients discontinued standard dose ibrutinib due to adverse events. The patient age, cytogenetics, number of prior therapies and follow-up were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of ≥ grade3 adverse events was significantly different between the two groups. The overall response rate and median PFS were also not significantly different between the two groups. In the limited patient numbers and follow-up period we show that outcomes of reduced dose ibrutinib are comparable to standard dose ibrutinib but with fewer adverse events. This study provides a proof of concept that a subset of patients might do well on reduced dose ibrutinib.

Global Burden of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm with substantial morbidity and mortality. A comprehensive description of the global burden of MM is needed to help direct health policy, resource allocation, research, and patient care. Objective: To describe the burden of MM and the availability of effective therapies for 21 world regions and 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2016. Design and Setting: We report incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2016 study. Data sources include vital registration system, cancer registry, drug availability, and survey data for stem cell transplant rates. We analyzed the contribution of aging, population growth, and changes in incidence rates to the overall change in incident cases from 1990 to 2016 globally, by sociodemographic index (SDI) and by region. We collected data on approval of lenalidomide and bortezomib worldwide. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multiple myeloma mortality; incidence; years lived with disabilities; years of life lost; and DALYs by age, sex, country, and year. Results: Worldwide in 2016 there were 138 509 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 121 000-155 480) incident cases of MM with an age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of 2.1 per 100 000 persons (95% UI, 1.8-2.3). Incident cases from 1990 to 2016 increased by 126% globally and by 106% to 192% for all SDI quintiles. The 3 world regions with the highest ASIR of MM were Australasia, North America, and Western Europe. Multiple myeloma caused 2.1 million (95% UI, 1.9-2.3 million) DALYs globally in 2016. Stem cell transplantation is routinely available in higher-income countries but is lacking in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of the Middle East. In 2016, lenalidomide and bortezomib had been approved in 73 and 103 countries, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Incidence of MM is highly variable among countries but has increased uniformly since 1990, with the largest increase in middle and low-middle SDI countries. Access to effective care is very limited in many countries of low socioeconomic development, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Global health policy priorities for MM are to improve diagnostic and treatment capacity in low and middle income countries and to ensure affordability of effective medications for every patient. Research priorities are to elucidate underlying etiological factors explaining the heterogeneity in myeloma incidence.

Cost of Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in a Public Sector Tertiary Care Hospital of North India.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplastic disorder, which accounts for 13% of all hematological malignancies globally. While, conventional chemotherapy used to be the mainstay treatment for the disease, the landscape of treatment witnessed a paradigm shift with the introduction of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In this paper, we present a cost analysis of various services provided to multiple myeloma patients, using either of the two modalities of treatments i.e. conventional chemotherapy or ASCT. Bottom-up costing methodology was used to collect data on all health system resources, i.e. capital or recurrent, which were used to provide various services to MM patients. Capital costs were annualized for their useful life using a discount rate of 5%. Out of pocket expenditure on treatment was also ascertained. Cost was assessed for various services, including outpatient consultation, bed day hospitalization in general ward, high dependency unit intensive care setting and bone marrow transplant unit. Unit costs were calculated from both health system and patient perspective. The overall cost per patient for ASCT (including high dose chemotherapy) and conventional chemotherapy from societal perspective was INR 395,527 (USD 6085) and INR 62,785 (USD 966) respectively. Estimates on cost from our study could be used for planning health services, and evaluating cost effectiveness of different modalities of care for multiple myeloma.