Two year continuation rates of contraceptive methods in France: a cohort study from the French national health insurance database.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the continuation rates of reimbursed contraceptive methods in French real-world conditions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using a representative sample of the national health insurance database, the General Sample of Beneficiaries (Echantillon Généralistes des Bénéficiaires [EGB]), was performed between 2006 and 2012. Selected women were ≥15 years of age and had started a reimbursed contraceptive method between 2009 and 2012 without prior reimbursement for an implant or an intrauterine contraceptive method between 2006 and 2008. The outcome of interest was the continuation rates, defined as the probability of women initiating a contraceptive method and continuing to use the same method over time. Continuation rates were assessed for up to 2 years. Only the first contraceptive method used during the study period was considered in the analysis. Non-parametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess continuation rates. RESULTS: A population of 42,365 women representative of the 4,109,405 French women initiating any reimbursed method between 2009 and 2012 was identified in the EGB: 74.5% of women used oral contraceptives, 12.8% the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), 9.2% the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) and 3.5% the subdermal etonogestrel (ENG) implant. The 2 year continuation rates varied from 9.1% for progestin-only oral contraceptives, 27.6% for first to second generation combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and 33.4% for third generation COCs to 83.6% for the ENG implant, 88.1% for the Cu-IUD and 91.1% for the LNG-IUS. CONCLUSION: This study conducted in real-world conditions showed that long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods remain rarely used in France despite high continuation rates over 2 years. Increasing the use of LARC methods is therefore a public health priority.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of aripiprazole once-monthly versus paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in the treatment of schizophrenia in France]. / Analyse coût-efficacité de l'aripiprazole injectable à libération prolongée (AILP) comparé au palmitate de palipéridone (PP) dans le traitement de la schizophrénie en France.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of aripiprazole once-monthly compared to once-monthly injectable paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia in France on the basis of results and data from the QUALIFY study. METHODS: Consumed resources data measured with a dedicated questionnaire and results on the quality of life scales from the QUALIFY study were combined with French standard unit costs of each collected consumed resources during QUALIFY to estimate the cost-effectiveness ratios of the two products. Multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed to test the combined impact of the different assumptions. RESULTS: Findings of the study showed greater efficacy on the quality of life (QLS) and psychiatric evaluation scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) observed in QUALIFY of aripiprazole compared with paliperidone palmitate. Findings also suggest a trend (P=0.0733) in the reduction of total costs linked to a statistical decrease (P<0,0001) in drug costs in the aripiprazole group. These findings are reinforced by the probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole appeared to be more cost-effective than paliperidone palmitate in the French context. Limits of this study are mainly related with the duration of the clinical trial and to assumptions on the transposability of measured consumed resources in the international clinical trial to the French healthcare system.

Cost-effectiveness model comparing dual-mobility to fixed-bearing designs for total hip replacement in France.

BACKGROUND: Instability is among the main causes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) failure. In clinical studies, THA with a dual-mobility cup (THA-DM) decreased the risk of instability after primary THA compared to THA with a fixed-bearing design (THA-FB). However, whether THA-DM is more cost-effective than THA-FB has not been established using Markov modelling with determination of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The objectives of this work were to: (1) measure the efficiency of these two options, (2) use the nationwide hospital electronic database (PMSI) to estimate direct costs of dislocations and revisions for instability, and (3) conduct deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to estimate potential mean annual cost-savings in France. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesised that primary THA-DM was cost-saving compared to primary THA-FB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the database, we identified 80,405 patients who had THA in 2009 and we collected their outcomes over 4 years (2009-2012). Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on the costs of resources used for all consequences of prosthetic dislocation and paid for by the statutory health insurance system or other sources. RESULTS: THA-DM was associated with a relative risk of dislocation of 0.4 versus THA-FB. This risk difference translated into 3283 fewer dislocations per 100,000 patients with THA-DM. The corresponding cost-savings for the 140,000 primary THA procedures done in France annually was 39.62 million Euros. A relative risk of 0.2 would yield annual cost-savings of 56.28 million Euros. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, THA-DM was the less costly option under all hypotheses, with potential maximum cost-savings of more than 100 million Euros per year in France. DISCUSSION: This comparative cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that THA-DM may induce substantial cost-savings compared to THA-FB. This possibility should be assessed by long-term clinical studies of new-generation DM prostheses.

Cost effectiveness of posaconazole in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in acute leukaemia patients for the French healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloblastic leukaemia (AML) patients are at high risk of suffering from invasive fungal infections (IFI). Posaconazole demonstrated higher efficacy than standard azole agents (SAA) in the prophylaxis of IFI in this population. The authors estimated the cost effectiveness of posaconazole versus SAA in France. METHODS: A decision-tree model was developed to compare posaconazole with SAA with the results of a published clinical trial. Clinical events were modelled with chance nodes reflecting probabilities of IFI, IFI-related death, and death from other causes. Medical resource consumption and costs were obtained from results of the clinical trial and from a dedicated survey on the costs of treating IFI using a retrospective chart review design. RESULTS: IFI treatment costs were estimated using medical files from 50 AML patients from six French centres, with a proven and probable IFI, who had been followed-up for 298 days on average. Direct costs directly related to IFI were estimated at €51,033, including extra costs of index hospitalisation, costs of antifungal therapy and additional hospitalisations related to IFI treatment. The model indicated that the healthcare costs for the posaconazole strategy were €5,223 (€2,697 for prophylaxis and €2,526 for IFI management), which was €859 less than the €6,083 in costs with SAA (€469 for prophylaxis and €5614 for IFI management). A sensitivity analysis indicated that there was an 80% probability that prophylaxis using the posaconazole strategy would be superior. CONCLUSION: The findings from this analysis suggest that posaconazole use is a clinically and economically dominant strategy in the prophylaxis of IFI in AML patients, given the usual limits of economic models and the uncertainty of costs estimates.

Lifetime costs and effectiveness of ReSTOR compared with a monofocal IOL and Array-SA40 in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To estimate the lifetime cost consequences for society and the National Health Service (NHS) of bilateral monofocal (SI40NB) or multifocal (ReSTOR or Array-SA40) intraocular lense (IOL) implantation after cataract surgery. SETTING: Public hospital in the Netherlands. METHODS: A Markov model simulated three cohorts of patients followed 69 until 100 years of age, or death. Spectacle independence rates for each IOL were adjusted to the results of a randomized clinical trial that compared monofocal and multifocal Array-SA40 IOL implants, together with a prospective cohort of patients implanted with ReSTOR. Adjustment was performed using the propensity score method in a multivariate analysis. Resource consumption was estimated from a dedicated Dutch survey. Dutch unit costs were applied to spectacles, cataract surgery, IOLs, visits to ophthalmologists, optometrists, transport, and spectacle cleaning materials. Cost discounted at 4% and undiscounted economic results were calculated. RESULTS: Spectacle independence rates were 86.0% for ReSTOR, 8.7% for monofocal IOLs, and 8.5% for Array-SA40. Patients lived without needing spectacles for 12.9 years after ReSTOR, for 1.4 years after monofocal IOLs, and 1.3 years after Array-SA40. ReSTOR patients bought 6.4 fewer pairs of spectacles than monofocal patients. Lifetime discounted cost consequences for the society were ReSTOR euro3969, monofocal IOLs euro4123, and Array-SA40 euro5326. Corresponding costs for the NHS were euro2415, euro2555, and euro2556, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ReSTOR IOLs provided higher levels of spectacle independence than monofocal SI40NB or multifocal Array-SA40 IOLs resulting in savings, compared to a monofocal, over the period modelled of euro315 for society and euro140 for the NHS.

Modelling lifetime cost consequences of toric compared with standard IOLs in cataract surgery of astigmatic patients in four European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lifetime costs of freeing astigmatic patients from spectacles after bilateral cataract surgery implanting toric intraocular lenses (IOLs: i.e., Acrysof Toric) versus monofocal IOLs, in France, Italy, Germany and Spain. METHODS: A Markov model followed patient cohorts from cataract surgery until death. Prevalence rates of patients not needing spectacles and the types of spectacles prescribed for those requiring them were obtained from clinical trials and national surveys. The economic perspective was societal. Mortality rates were incorporated into the model. Discount rates were applied. A sensitivity analysis was performed on non-discounted costs. RESULTS: Fewer patients with toric IOLs needed spectacles for distance vision than patients with monofocal IOLs. With monofocal IOLs more than 66% of patients needed complex spectacles compared to less than 25% implanted with toric IOLs. In France and Italy, toric IOLs reduced overall costs relative to otherwise high spectacle costs after cataract surgery. Savings were 897.0 euros (France), 822.5 euros (Germany), 895.8 euros (Italy) and 391.6 euros (Spain), without discounting. On applying a 3% discount rate the costs became 691.7 euros, 646.4 euros, 693.9 euros and 308.2 euros, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral toric IOL implants in astigmatic patients decreased spectacle dependence for distance vision and the need for complex spectacles. The economic consequences for patients depended on the national spectacle costs usually incurred after cataract surgery.

Epidemiology, medical outcomes and costs of catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units of four European countries: literature- and registry-based estimates.

Despite high incidence rates, little information is available on the burden of illness of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in Europe. A review of the available data was performed to estimate the clinical outcomes and costs associated with CRBSIs during intensive care unit (ICU) stays in four European countries (France, Germany, Italy and the UK). Based on these data we have estimated the CRBSI-related mortality and the annual costs associated with CRBSIs in the aforementioned countries. Results show large variation between countries: 1.12-4.2 CRBSI per 1000 catheter days, 8400-14,400 CRBSIs episodes per year, 1000-1584 deaths per year, 15,960-201,600 ICU days caused by CRBSIs and euro35.9 to euro163.9 million associated costs. Discrepancies are mainly explained by the heterogeneous quality of epidemiological studies, as well as the variety of national clinical practices.

Modelling lifetime cost consequences of ReSTOR for presbyopia in four European countries.

AIMS: To compare the lifetime cost consequences, in France, Italy, Germany and Spain, of liberating presbyopic patients from spectacles by implanting the multifocal intraocular lens ReSTOR. METHODS: A Markov model was created to compare a patient cohort implanted with ReSTOR at age 45 years, with a cohort using spectacles, until death or age 100 years. Prevalence rates of patients not requiring spectacles after surgery were obtained from clinical trials. Resource utilisation included implant surgery, spectacles, visits to ophthalmologists and optic centres, transport and time lost by patients. Economic perspectives were those of society and sickness funds. Mortality rates were introduced into the model. Cataract surgery was allowed just for the spectacles-only cohort. RESULTS: Rate of spectacle independence was fixed at 80% for ReSTOR. When time spent to care for refraction was not taken into account, lifelong ReSTOR cost was higher than spectacles in all countries (293 euro; 1013 euro), according to the societal perspective. When time was included, cost saving was observed in Italy (136 euro) and the incremental cost to be free of spectacles comprised between \[euro]11 and \[euro]816. According to the NHS perspective, ReSTOR is a cost saving strategy (-274 euro; -605 euro). CONCLUSIONS: At a 3% discount rate, savings achieved by liberating patients from spectacles counterbalanced partially the initially higher cost of ReSTOR according to the society perspective. ReSTOR could be considered as cost-effective in the four countries provided that the willingness to pay of patients to be free of spectacles would be lower than 23.65 euro/year.

Costs and persistence of carbonic anhydrase inhibitor versus alpha-2 agonists, associated with beta-blockers, in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: an analysis of the UK-GPRD database.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and associated costs of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors + beta-blocker versus alpha-2 adrenergic agonists + beta-blocker in glaucoma therapy, as documented by The United Kingdom General Practitioner Research Database (UK-GPRD). RESEARCH DESIGN: Patient chart analysis. METHODS: Patient records were screened for diagnoses of ocular hypertension or glaucoma, and for surgery, laser therapy or medication specific to glaucoma. Selected patients were those prescribed either carbonic anhydrase inhibitors + beta-blocker or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists + beta-blocker. Treatment failure was defined as a glaucoma prescription change, i.e. addition, cessation or replacement of medication, surgery or laser therapy. Times to treatment failure were compared with an adjusted Cox model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment persistence and cost. RESULTS: Included patients were those treated with either carbonic anhydrase inhibitors + beta-blocker (n = 5581) or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists + beta-blocker (n = 1164). The average age at diagnosis was 68.1 years and 48.2% were male. Treatment failure at one year was significantly (p < 0.001) less frequent after carbonic anhydrase inhibitors + beta-blocker (57% of patients) than after alpha-2 adrenergic agonists + beta-blocker (64.3%). The hazard ratio for failure was lower (0.82: p < 0.0001) with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors + beta-blocker following adjustment for age, gender, comorbidities and duration of follow-up. Adjusted annual costs of glaucoma management were pound 348.04 for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors + beta-blocker and pound 356.80 for alpha-2 adrenergic agonists + beta-blocker. CONCLUSIONS: According to UK-GPRD information, glaucoma therapy with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors + beta-blocker is more persistent than with alpha-2 adrenergic agonists + beta-blocker at a similar cost.

Costs and effectiveness of travoprost versus a dorzolamide + timolol fixed combination in first-line treatment of glaucoma: analysis conducted on the United Kingdom General Practitioner Research Database.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and associated costs of travoprost versus a fixed combination of dorzolamide + timolol as first-line therapy for glaucoma according to data collected by the United Kingdom General Practitioner Research Database (UK-GPRD). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of ocular hypertension, glaucoma, or who had been treated topically by surgery or laser therapy were selected. Patients starting first-line treatment with travoprost or a fixed dorzolamide + timolol combination were included. Times to treatment failure were compared with an adjusted Cox model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost and treatment failure defined as a prescription change (adding or removing a topical treatment, or initiating laser therapy or surgery). RESULTS: 56 612 patients were extracted from the database and 39 808 patients received at least one topical prescription for IOP-lowering (intraocular pressure) therapy. Of these, 639 were treated with travoprost and 387 with dorzolamide + timolol, as first-line therapies. No significant difference was found between patient characteristics. Patients were aged 70.0 years and 48.5% were male. At 1 year, treatment failure was experienced by 30.4% of patients receiving travoprost and 49.4% receiving dorzolamide + timolol (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio for failure was 0.79 (p < 0.03) less with travoprost, after adjusting on age, gender, comorbidities and duration of follow-up. Adjusted annual costs of glaucoma management were significantly (p < 0.001) lower with travoprost ( pound198.31) than with dorzolamide + timolol ( pound312.21). CONCLUSION: This retrospective costs and consequences analysis study showed that travoprost is more efficient than dorzolamide + timolol as first-line therapy for glaucoma patients. Patients continued longer with first-line treatment when prescribed travoprost at a lower cost.

Costs of cardiovascular events of diabetic patients in the French hospitals.

AIMS: To test the assumption that hospital management of macro-vascular complications of Diabetes is more resource consuming in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients and to estimate, if relevant, the extra costs for diabetic patients. METHODS: The French national DRG database (PMSI- 2003) was analysed for the following cardio-vascular events (CVE): Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, Cardiac Arrest and Coronary Revascularization. Diabetic patients (Type 1 and 2) were identified using co-morbidity diagnosis. Differences in various indicators of resource consumption were tested between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Using length of stay (LOS) as a cost driver, the extra hospital costs of each CVE were then estimated by reference to mean costs measured on the whole database. RESULTS: Average LOS of patients with diabetes were significantly longer than of non diabetic patients. (stroke: +2.5 days, myocardial infarction: +1.5 days, unstable angina: +1.3 days, revascularisation: +2.8 days; P<0.001). The mean numbers of medical procedures by stay were also higher in the diabetic group. Extra hospital costs of CVE for diabetic patients as compared with mean costs were the following: +23.9% (non fatal stroke), +10.4% (non fatal myocardial infarction), +6.1% (unstable angina), +9.1% (coronary revascularization). CONCLUSION: The hospital costs of CVE in diabetic patients are higher than average. Specific costs for these complications should be used to improve the relevance of economic studies of Diabetes.

[Anogenital warts incidence, medical management and costs in women consulting gynaecologists in France]. / Incidence, prise en charge et coût des condylomes acuminés anogénitaux chez les femmes consultant leur gynécologue en France.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to estimate the incidence of genital warts and treatment costs in women consulting gynaecologists in France in 2005. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed through a representative sample of gynaecologists. Investigators enrolled all patients seen with genital warts during a 2-month period. A questionnaire detailing socio-demographic characteristics, case description, patient's clinical profile, past/ current management, and treatment of genital warts was completed by the investigators. RESULTS: 212 gynaecologists participated in the study. Questionnaires were completed for 263 patients including 198 (75.3%) new cases, 53 (20.2%) recurrent cases and 12 (4.5%) resistant cases. The overall incidence was estimated at 228.9/100,000 (female 15-65year old population) corresponding to 47,755 cases annually managed by gynaecologists in France. The average treatment cost was 482.70euro for society and 342.40 euro for third-party payers. The annual direct cost of genital warts management was estimated at 23,051,339euro, of which 16,351,312euro was funded by the French health care system. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The costs of treating genital warts are considerable. The introduction of a quadrivalent (type 6,11,16,18) Human Papillomavirus vaccine including types responsible for 90% of genital warts could potentially substantially reduce these costs.

Cost consequences of adjuvant capecitabine, Mayo Clinic and de Gramont regimens for stage III colon cancer in the French setting.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the cost consequences of oral capecitabine and two different intravenous regimens of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (de Gramont and Mayo Clinic regimens) as adjuvant therapy in stage III colon cancer in France. METHODS: Clinical efficacy and safety data were taken from published clinical trials. Medical resource use was estimated from published data and expert opinion. Direct costs (drug acquisition, inpatient and home drug administration, laboratory tests, transportation, and management of adverse events) were considered over a time horizon of 46 months (3.8 years). The perspective taken was that of the French Sickness Funds. RESULTS: In patients treated with capecitabine, relapse-free survival was 1.3 months longer than with the Mayo Clinic regimen, which has been shown to be as effective as the de Gramont regimen. In the base case analysis, capecitabine was less costly (3,654 EUR/patient) than the Mayo Clinic (10,481 EUR/ patient) and de Gramont (7,204 EUR/patient) regimens. In the sensitivity analysis, capecitabine remained dominant except when the intravenous regimens were assumed to be administered at home in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In France, capecitabine is more effective and less costly than both the Mayo Clinic and de Gramont regimens as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

Estimation of direct unit costs associated with non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in five European countries.

The objective of this study was to estimate the unit costs of non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in five European countries based on the results of the SOTI and TROPOS clinical trials in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. The information recorded in the Case Report Forms was used. The perspective of third party payers was adopted. Hip fracture unit cost was the highest. The ranges of costs among countries was narrow for hip from 8,346 euros (Italy) to 9,907euros (France), but wider for other fractures: 890 euros (Spain) to 2,022 euros (Italy) for wrist, 1,167euros (Spain) to 3,268 euros (Italy) for pelvis, 837euros (Spain) to 2,116 euros (Italy) for sternum/clavicle, 565 euros (Spain) to 908 euros (France) for rib, 1,518 euros (Spain) to 3,651 euros (Belgium) for humerus, 1,805 euros (Spain) to 3,521 euros (Italy) for leg. The costs of those fractures should be considered when estimating the cost of osteoporosis.

Donepezil for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in France: the economic implications.

In the present study, the socioeconomic impact of the use of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) living in France was examined. A model was created to extrapolate over a 3-year period the results from placebo-controlled trials together with epidemiological and prevalence data. Costs considered in the model were net societal costs associated with paid and unpaid assistance, general medical consumption and institutional care. The model suggested that delays in cognitive decline and functional dependence due to treatment reduced the time spent in institutional care and the burden on caregivers. Over a 3-year period, total net costs of caring for untreated patients with an initial Mini-Mental State Examination score ranging from 10 to 26 were EUR 53,206 compared with EUR 42,720 for a patient treated with donepezil--an annual cost saving of approximately EUR 3,500 per patient. Cost savings were mainly due to savings in unpaid caregiver time, which, apart from patient institutionalization, represented the most costly component of total care in this study but had no direct budgetary impact. Overall, these data suggest that donepezil is a cost-effective treatment for mild to moderately impaired AD patients living in France.

[A model-based comparison of cost effectiveness of imiquimod versus podophyllotoxin for the treatment of external anogenital warts in France]. / Comparaison coût-efficacité par modélisation de l'imiquimod et de la podophyllotoxine dans le traitement du condylome acuminé externe en France.

OBJECTIVES: For the National health scheme, to compare the costs and the efficacy of treatment of external anogenital warts with imiquimod and podophyllotoxin and laser therapy in the case of failure or relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A model simulating the two successive treatments was built. In the first phase, the two topical treatments applied by the patients: podophyllotoxin for 4 weeks and imiquimod for 16 weeks were compared. In the case of failure or relapse, laser therapy that is widely used in France in this indication and, was applied. The efficacy of the topical treatments was assessed after reanalysis of the results of two controlled clinical trials versus placebo. These two trials were retained because they were comparable in method and had been recently published at the same time. A review of the literature assessed the results of laser therapy. A survey was conducted to collect the medical resources consumed by the different treatments. RESULTS: Imiquimod provided a clearance rate of 49.5 p. 100, i.e., the disappearance of the lesions at 16 weeks, greater than that of podophyllotoxin (28.3 p. 100) at 4 weeks. The relapse rate was lowest with imiquimod (13.3 p. 100) than with podophyllotoxin (30.9 p. 100). The remission rate without relapse 3 months after the end of treatment was, including the laser, of 62 p. 100 following imiquimod and of 47 p. 100 following podophyllotoxin. The costs per patient cured was of 668 Euros for imiquimod and of 689 Euros for podophyllotoxin. CONCLUSION: Imiquimod, because of its greater initial efficacy, is at least as cost-effective as podophyllotoxin the treatment of external genital warts.

Cost effectiveness of emedastine versus levocabastine in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in 7 European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of emedastine, a new antihistamine, versus levocabastine in the treatment of acute allergic conjunctivitis (AAC) in Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Sweden. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomised double-blind multicountry clinical trial followed by economic modelling from the treatment provider perspective. PATIENTS: A total of 221 patients (109 emedastine, 112 levocabastine) with AAC were included. METHODS: The clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of emedastine 0.05% and levocabastine 0.05%, both twice daily, for 42 days, using ocular redness, itching, days without symptoms and clinical failure as outcome measures. The cost of first-line treatment failure, including visits, drugs and laboratory examinations, was established in each country from a panel of ophthalmologists and general practitioners. Full sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: From day 7 to 42, patients treated with emedastine had less itching (p < 0.001) and less redness (p < 0.001). The failure rate was 10% less (p < 0.02) with emedastine and patients treated with emedastine had an incremental 8.5 days (p < 0.01) without symptoms. Emedastine and levocabastine were equally well tolerated. In all European countries, the cost of failure was lower with emedastine. Emedastine was found to be economically dominant relative to levocabastine, i.e. more effective and less expensive, in Belgium, Germany, Portugal and Sweden; in France, The Netherlands and Norway the incremental cost was low (less than 1 euro per additional symptom-free day). CONCLUSION: Through a model based on a randomised clinical trial and cost estimates of treatment failure derived from practitioner interviews, emedastine is a cost-effective treatment of AAC.

Economic analysis of adjuvant therapy with interferon alpha-2a in stage II malignant melanoma.

Using the trial demonstrating that interferonalpha-2a (IFNalpha-2a) is efficacious as adjuvant therapy in stage II melanoma, we evaluate its outcomes and economic consequences. Using rates observed in the 5-year trial and published figures, survival and Q-TWIST (Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity) were extrapolated to a 10-year and lifetime horizon. Cost analysis was performed using the trial's data, published literature and experts' opinions from the perspective of the French Sickness Funds. Patients in the IFNalpha-2a-group have an additional 0.26 years in life-expectancy over a 5-year time period (P=0.046), 0.67 years over a 10-year period and 2.59 years over a lifetime. Cost per life-year-gained was estimated at approximately 14400 after 5 years, 6635 after 10 years and 1716 over a lifetime. Assuming that there is an improvement in disease-free survival only, cost is 26147 per Q-TWIST. Cost-effectiveness of IFNalpha-2a in stage II melanoma compares favourably with estimates for widely used therapies in the oncological field.