OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Liver.

Data on adult liver transplants performed in the US in 2018 are notable for (1) continued growth in numbers of new waitlist registrants (11,844) and transplants performed (8250); (2) continued increase in the transplant rate (54.5 per 100 waitlist-years); (3) a precipitous decline in waitlist registrations and transplants for hepatitis-C-related indications; (4) increases in waitlist registrants and recipients with alcoholic liver disease and with clinical profiles consistent with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; (5) increased use of hepatitis C virus antibody-positive donor livers; and (6) continued improvement in graft survival despite changing recipient characteristics such as older age and higher rates of obesity and diabetes. Variability in transplant rates remained by candidate race, hepatocellular carcinoma status, urgency status, and geography. The volume of pediatric liver transplants was relatively unchanged. The highest rate of pre-transplant mortality persisted for children aged younger than 1 year. Children underwent transplant at higher acuity than in the past, as evidenced by higher model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease scores and listings at status 1A and 1B at transplant. Despite higher illness severity scores at transplant, pediatric graft and patient survival posttransplant have improved over time.

OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Liver.

Several notable developments in adult liver transplantation in the US occurred in 2015. The year saw the largest number of liver transplants to date, leading to reductions in median waiting time, in waitlist mortality for all model for end-stage liver disease categories, and in the number of candidates on the waiting list at the end of the year. Numbers of additions to the waiting list and of liver transplants performed in patients with hepatitis C virus infection decreased for the first time in recent years. However, other diagnoses, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and alcoholic cirrhosis, became more prevalent. Despite large numbers of severely ill patients undergoing liver transplant, graft survival rates continued to improve. The number of new active candidates added to the pediatric liver transplant waiting list in 2015 was 689, down from a peak of 826 in 2005. The number of prevalent pediatric candidates (on the list on December 31 of the given year) continued to decline, to 373 active and 195 inactive candidates. The number of pediatric liver transplants peaked at 613 in 2008 and was 580 in 2015. The number of living donor pediatric liver transplants increased to its highest level, 79, in 2015; most were from donors closely related to the recipients. Pediatric graft survival rates continued to improve.

OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: liver.

During 2013, 10,479 adult candidates were added to the liver transplant waiting list, compared with 10,185 in 2012; 5921 liver transplants were performed, and 211 of the transplanted organs were from living donors. As of December 31, 2013, 15,027 candidates were registered on the waiting list, including 12,407 in active status. The most significant change in allocation policy affecting liver waitlist trends in 2013 was the Share 35 policy, whereby organs from an entire region are available to candidates with model for end-stage liver disease scores of 35 or higher. Median waiting time for such candidates decreased dramatically, from 14.0 months in 2012 to 1.4 months in 2013, but the effect on waitlist mortality is unknown. The number of new active pediatric candidates added to the liver transplant waiting list increased to 693 in 2013. Transplant rates were highest for candidates aged younger than 1 year (275.6 per 100 waitlist years) and lowest for candidates aged 11 to 17 years (97.0 per 100 waitlist years). Five-year graft survival was 71.7% for recipients aged younger than 1 year, 74.9% for ages 1 to 5 years, 78.9% ages 6 to 10 years, and 77.4% for ages 11 to 17 years.

Methods to estimate and analyze medical care resource use. An example from liver transplantation.

This paper describes a method to construct a standardized health care resource use database. Billing and clinical data were analyzed for 916 patients who received liver transplantations at three medical centers over a 4-year period. Data were checked for completeness by assessing whether each patient's bill included charges covering specified dates and for specific services, and for accuracy by comparing a sample of bills to medical records. Detailed services were matched to a standardized service list from one of the centers, and a single price list was applied. For certain services, clinical data were used to estimate service use or, if a match was not possible, adjusted charges for the services were used. Twenty-three patients were eliminated from the database because of incomplete resource use data. There was very good correspondence between bills and medical records, except for blood products. Direct matches to the standardized service list accounted for 69.3% of services overall; 9.4% of services could not be matched to the standardized service list and were thus adjusted for center and/or time period. Clinical data were used to estimate resource use for blood products, operating room time, and medications; these estimations accounted for 21.3% of services overall. A database can be constructed that allows comparison of standardized resource use and avoids biases due to accounting, geographic, or temporal factors. Clinical data are essential for the creation of such a database. The methods described are particularly useful in studies of the cost-effectiveness of medical technologies.

Resource utilization in liver transplantation: effects of patient characteristics and clinical practice. NIDDK Liver Transplantation Database Group.

CONTEXT: Liver transplantation is among the most costly of medical services, yet few studies have addressed the relationship between the resources utilized for this procedure and specific patient characteristics and clinical practices. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of pretransplant patient characteristics and clinical practices with hospital resource utilization. DESIGN: Prospective cohort of patients who received liver transplants between January 1991 and July 1994. SETTING: University of California, San Francisco; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; and the University of Nebraska, Omaha. PATIENTS: Seven hundred eleven patients who received single-organ liver transplants, were at least 16 years old, and had nonfulminant liver disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Standardized resource utilization derived from a database created by matching all services to a single price list. RESULTS: Higher adjusted resource utilization was associated with donor age of 60 years or older (28% [$53813] greater mean resource utilization; P=.005); recipient age of 60 years or older (17% [$32795]; P=.01); alcoholic liver disease (26% [$49596]; P=.002); Child-Pugh class C (41% [$67 658]; P<.001); care from the intensive care unit at time of transplant (42% [$77833]; P<.001); death in the hospital (35% [$67 076]; P<.001); and having multiple liver transplants during the index hospitalization (154% increase [$474 740 vs $186 726 for 1 transplant]; P<.001). Adjusted length of stay and resource utilization also differed significantly among transplant centers. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, economic, and ethical dilemmas in liver transplantation are highlighted by these findings. Recipients who were older, had alcoholic liver disease, or were severely ill were the most expensive to treat; this suggests that organ allocation criteria may affect transplant costs. Clinical practices and resource utilization varied considerably among transplant centers; methods to reduce variation in practice patterns, such as clinical guidelines, might lower costs while maintaining quality of care.

Predictors of the cost of liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a highly effective but costly therapy for end-stage liver disease. However, there are limited data on the demographic and clinical variables that affect cost. We undertook a preliminary study using multiple regression techniques to analyze factors that influence the cost of OLT. METHODS: Patient and demographic data, including laboratory values and charges for all liver transplantations performed between June 1992 and June 1993 were analyzed (n = 111). Linear regression with standard and log-transformed values was performed by using STATA software (Stata Corporation College Station, TX). Independent variables included in the analyses were age, sex, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, primary versus retransplantation, liver-kidney transplantation, and laboratory parameters of both liver (aspartate aminotransferase, AST; alkaline phosphatase; bilirubin; albumin; and prothrombin time) and kidney (blood urea nitrogen, BUN; creatinine) function. An F-to-remove strategy was employed with a significance level set at P = .05. RESULTS: The full model with 12 variables explained 37% of the total variation in charges. When one excludes variables that did not have a significant impact on cost, the remaining significant variables were BUN and UNOS status 1. The final model was Charges (US$) = 3,407 x BUN + 74,474 x status 1 + 102,662. This model accounted for 29% of the total variability with BUN accounting for the vast majority (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Renal function is the most important predictor of cost of OLT (P < .001). UNOS status 1 further increases cost, but other hospitalized patients have similar costs when one controls for other clinical variables. The degree of liver impairment is less important in predicting cost.

The impact of surgical complications after liver transplantation on resource utilization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of surgical complications on length of stay and hospital charges after liver transplantation. DESIGN: A retrospective economic evaluation of the outcomes during initial hospitalization after liver transplantation. SETTING: University hospital treating referred patients. PATIENTS: The study population was 109 patients undergoing 111 liver transplantations during fiscal year 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital charges and length of stay during the initial hospitalization after liver transplantation. Multivariate regression methods were used to analyze the impact of surgical complications on costs. RESULTS: Of the 111 transplantations, 30 (27%) had a surgical complication that required a return to the operating room during the initial hospitalization. The effect of a surgical complication was to increase the mean hospital charges (excluding physician charges) from $150,092 to $347,728 (difference of mean, $197,636; confidence interval of difference, $114,153 to $319,326). The median length of stay was 16 days for patients without complications and 45 days for those with complications. Univariate and multivariate models suggested that surgical complications had the greatest effect on length of stay and hospital charges among the factors studied. Complications tended to occur more frequently among patients with United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status 1 (42% vs 22%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications after liver transplantation have a marked impact on the cost of the procedure. The magnitude of this effect is greater than that of UNOS status, presence of rejection, or other demographic or clinical factors studied. Complications tend to occur in the most ill patients. Identifying strategies to reduce the risk of complications, particularly in patients with UNOS status 1, likely can reduce the cost of transplantation.

The impact of immunosuppressive regimens on the cost of liver transplantation--results from the U.S. FK506 multicenter trial.

In an effort to determine the total one-year cost of liver transplantation, the underlying drivers of that cost, and any cost differences between alternative immunosuppressive regimens, an analysis was performed comparing the average one-year posttransplant charges of 322 patients participating in the "U.S. Multi-center Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing FK-506 to Cyclosporine in Liver Transplantation." Total one-year inpatient charges including all readmissions were examined. Professional fees and outpatient charges were excluded. Costs for tacrolimus drug and blood assays were assumed to be equal to those in the CsA group. For patients completing the study, the tacrolimus group had an average length of stay and average one-year cost seven days (P = .06) and $19,290 (P = .05) lower than the CsA group. The difference in rejection profiles between the two arms seems to largely account for the lower costs. The tacrolimus arm consistently had fewer patients in the more severe rejection groups. Increased incidence and severity of rejection were directly related to higher average lengths of stay and costs of transplantation (P < .001). Tacrolimus immunosuppression during the first year after liver transplantation is more cost-effective than CsA in achieving similar patient and graft survival rates. Differing incidence and severity of rejection can dramatically affect the first-year cost of liver transplantation.

Should liver transplantation be performed for patients with chronic hepatitis B? Yes!

The use of passive immunoprophylaxis to prevent HBV reinfection of the allograft following liver transplantation has led to a dramatic improvement in the outcome of patients who undergo transplantation for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatitis B previously was not one of our favorite diseases for which to perform liver transplantation. However, we now regard patients with this disease as good candidates for liver transplantation. I hope I have presented a compelling argument that no patient with hepatitis B, regardless of serological status, should be a priori denied liver transplantation. Studies from both the U.S. and Europe have shown that HBV reinfection can be prevented in almost all patients at a cost not out of line with other accepted indications for liver transplantation. Thus, I once again, ask the question, "Should patients with chronic hepatitis B undergo liver transplantation?" At our institution, the answer is an emphatic Yes!

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for refractory ascites: assessment of clinical and hormonal response and renal function.

Cirrhosis is frequently complicated by ascites that may become resistant to diuretic therapy. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) represent a new treatment for this debilitating condition. The aim of this study was to ascertain the clinical efficacy of TIPS, as well as its impact on renal function and on hormonal parameters. Five inpatients with refractory ascites were studied prospectively before TIPS, and 3 and 14 days after TIPS. After TIPS, ascites completely resolved or was minimal in all patients. Diuretics were discontinued in three subjects and decreased by at least 50% in two. One patient developed liver failure after TIPS and required liver transplantation; the others remained stable after a mean follow-up of 14 months. Mean urinary sodium excretion increased from 2.1 +/- 0.6 mEq/24 hr before TIPS to 13.0 +/- 4.3 mEq/24 hr 14 days after TIPS. Mean serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate also tended to improve during the study period. With the exception of the patient who developed liver failure, plasma aldosterone concentration decreased from a mean of 126.0 +/- 29.9 ng/dL to 22.8 +/- 6.8 ng/dL (P = .04), and plasma renin activity decreased from a mean of 9.0 +/- 3.0 micrograms/L/h to 0.9 +/- 0.1 microgram/L/h (P = .08). Additionally, 19 patients who underwent TIPS for refractory ascites outside of this protocol were followed prospectively for a mean of 282 days. Clinical improvement in ascites control was noted in 74%, and the mean dose of diuretics was decreased by more than 50%. Nonresponders more often had underlying renal disease. In conclusion, TIPS is an effective therapy for refractory ascites in most patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)