RESUMO
Manufacturing has been the key factor limiting rollout of vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring rapid development and large-scale implementation of novel manufacturing technologies. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222, Vaxzevria) is an efficacious vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, based upon an adenovirus vector. We describe the development of a process for the production of this vaccine and others based upon the same platform, including novel features to facilitate very large-scale production. We discuss the process economics and the "distributed manufacturing" approach we have taken to provide the vaccine at globally-relevant scale and with international security of supply. Together, these approaches have enabled the largest viral vector manufacturing campaign to date, providing a substantial proportion of global COVID-19 vaccine supply at low cost.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Indústria Farmacêutica/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Vacinas , Animais , Escherichia coli , Geografia , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Pan troglodytes , SARS-CoV-2 , Tecnologia Farmacêutica , Vacinação/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
Adenoviruses are potent vectors for inducing and boosting cellular immunity to encoded recombinant antigens. However, the widespread seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies to common human adenovirus serotypes limits their use. Simian adenoviruses do not suffer from the same drawbacks. We have constructed a replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine expressing the conserved influenza antigens, nucleoprotein (NP), and matrix protein 1 (M1). Here, we report safety and T-cell immunogenicity following vaccination with this novel recombinant simian adenovirus, ChAdOx1 NP+M1, in a first in human dose-escalation study using a 3+3 study design, followed by boosting with modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing the same antigens in some volunteers. We demonstrate ChAdOx1 NP+M1 to be safe and immunogenic. ChAdOx1 is a promising vaccine vector that could be used to deliver vaccine antigens where strong cellular immune responses are required for protection.
Assuntos
Adenovirus dos Símios/genética , Vírus da Influenza A/metabolismo , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Pan troglodytes/virologia , Proteínas de Ligação a RNA/metabolismo , Proteínas do Core Viral/metabolismo , Proteínas da Matriz Viral/metabolismo , Replicação Viral/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Antígenos Virais/imunologia , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Vetores Genéticos/administração & dosagem , Vetores Genéticos/efeitos adversos , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo , Proteínas de Ligação a RNA/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismo , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Proteínas do Core Viral/imunologia , Proteínas da Matriz Viral/imunologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The novel influenza vaccine MVA-NP+M1 is designed to boost cross-reactive T-cell responses to internal antigens of the influenza A virus that are conserved across all subtypes, providing protection against both influenza disease and virus shedding against all influenza A viruses. Following a phase 1 clinical study that demonstrated vaccine safety and immunogenicity, a phase 2a vaccination and influenza challenge study has been conducted in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: Volunteers with no measurable serum antibodies to influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2005 received either a single vaccination with MVA-NP+M1 or no vaccination. T-cell responses to the vaccine antigens were measured at enrollment and again prior to virus challenge. All volunteers underwent intranasal administration of influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2005 while in a quarantine unit and were monitored for symptoms of influenza disease and virus shedding. RESULTS: Volunteers had a significantly increased T-cell response to the vaccine antigens following a single dose of the vaccine, with an increase in cytolytic effector molecules. Intranasal influenza challenge was undertaken without safety issues. Two of 11 vaccinees and 5 of 11 control subjects developed laboratory-confirmed influenza (symptoms plus virus shedding). Symptoms of influenza were less pronounced in the vaccinees and there was a significant reduction in the number of days of virus shedding in those vaccinees who developed influenza (mean, 1.09 days in controls, 0.45 days in vaccinees, P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first demonstration of clinical efficacy of a T-cell-based influenza vaccine and indicates that further clinical development should be undertaken. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00993083.