Assessment of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion regarding pterygomaxillary disjunction using thin volume-rendering technique: in variance analysis and in reliability, accuracy, and validity.

PURPOSE: To assess surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) with or without pterygomaxillary disjunction using a thin volume-rendering technique in variance analysis and in reliability, accuracy, and validity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thin volume-rendered images of 68 patients were evaluated preoperatively and 2.87 ± 1.59 months after expansion with respect to dentoskeletal effects. RESULTS: Variance analysis of SARME with pterygomaxillary disjunction showed an important decrease in transverse widening and segmental outward inclination and an increase in vestibular bone plate thickness (premolars) in patients younger than 20 years with bone-borne devices; the greatest increase in transverse widening was in patients with 3-segment osteotomy and tooth-borne devices. Analysis of SARME without pterygomaxillary disjunction showed an important decrease in transverse widening and segmental inward inclination in patients older than 20 years with bone-borne devices; the greatest pterygoid lateral bending was in patients with 2-segment osteotomy and bone-borne devices. CONCLUSION: The performance of pterygomaxillary disjunction should depend on patient age (ie, treatment with pterygomaxillary disjunction in those >20 years old; treatment without pterygomaxillary disjunction in those <20 years old). Patients with pterygomaxillary disjunction, 3-segment osteotomy, and tooth-borne devices tended to show an increase in transverse widening but at the price of greater attachment loss. Patients younger than 20 years with pterygomaxillary disjunction and bone-borne devices tended to show an increase in vestibular bone plate (premolars) but at the price of decrease in transverse widening.

Skeletal stability in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: P(L/DL)LA-resorbable versus titanium osteofixation.

BACKGROUND: One-year skeletal stability following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery was assessed by comparing poly(L-lactide-co-DL-lactide) to titanium osteofixation. METHODS: Thirty patients underwent osteofixation with poly(L-lactide-co-DL-lactide) copolymer and 30 had 2.0-mm titanium-miniplate osteosyntheses. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 1-year follow-up. Average +/- SD values were as follows in resorbable plate-osteosyntheses (number of cases/titanium controls): for maxillary advancement, 3.5 +/- 4.1 mm (n = 19)/5.4 +/- 3.5 mm (n = 21); setback, 2.8 +/- 3.7 mm (n = 9)/1.9 +/- 1.8 mm (n = 8); elongation, 4.2 +/- 3.6 mm (n = 18)/3.7 +/- 5.2 mm (n = 14); and intrusion, 1.9 +/- 1.7 mm (n = 12)/3.3 +/- 2.7 mm (n = 13); for mandibular advancement, 4.6 +/- 3.6 mm (n = 10)/6.3 +/- 8.8 mm (n = 18); setback, 7.5 +/- 8.3 mm (n = 20)/7.2 +/- 3.2 mm (n = 12); enlargement of the mandibular angle, 11.8 +/- 9.9 degrees (n = 19)/7.9 +/- 6.6 degrees (n = 21); and reduction, 4.5 +/- 3.2 degrees (n = 9)/6.3 +/- 6.6 degrees (n = 9). RESULTS: Preoperative to postoperative landmark positions within the study and control groups differed highly significantly (p = 0.008, paired t test), yet the amount of operative movement was comparable between the study and control groups (p = 0.5, two-sided t test). Absolute instability at the advanced A-point was (study group/controls) 2.3 +/- 1.8/2.4 +/- 2 mm, setback was 2.3 +/- 1.9 mm/2.5 +/- 1.7 mm, elongation at the anterior nasal spine was 3.8 +/- 3.1 mm/3.1 +/- 3.6 mm, intrusion was 2.1 +/- 1.9 mm/2.2 +/- 1.5 mm, advancement instability at the B-point was 4.9 +/- 4.3 mm/5.1 +/- 8.2 mm, setback was 3.0 +/- 2 mm/1.7 +/- 2 mm, mandibular angle enlargement instability was 6.7 +/- 8.9 degrees/8.2 +/- 9.6 degrees, and angle narrowing was 6.8 +/- 5.2 degrees/4.2 +/- 5.9 degrees. Absolute postoperative instability did not differ significantly between the study and control groups (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Resorbable osteofixation as tested proved to be as reliable as titanium, but as the study and control groups were not matched, the results have to be interpreted as preliminary. Resorbable materials permitted clinically faster occlusal and condylar settling than standard titanium osteosyntheses, as bone segments showed slight clinical mobility up to 6 weeks postoperatively.