Persistence and emergence of new neuropsychological deficits following SARS-CoV-2 infection: A follow-up assessment of the Geneva COVID-COG cohort.

Background: Despite numerous observations of neuropsychological deficits immediately following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, little is known about what happens to these deficits over time and whether they are affected by changes in fatigue and any psychiatric symptoms. We aimed to assess the prevalence of neuropsychological deficits at 6-9 months and again at 12-15 months after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to explore whether it was associated with changes in fatigue and psychiatric symptoms. Methods: We administered a series of neuropsychological tests and psychiatric questionnaires to 95 patients (mean age = 57.12 years, standard deviation (SD) = 10.68; 35.79% women) 222 (time point 1 (T1)) and 441 (time point 2 (T2)) days on average after infection. Patients were categorised according to the severity of their respiratory COVID-19 symptoms in the acute phase: mild (no hospitalisation), moderate (conventional hospitalisation), and severe (hospitalisation in intensive care unit (ICU) plus mechanical ventilation). We ran Monte-Carlo simulation methods at each time point to generate a simulated population and then compared the cumulative percentages of cognitive disorders displayed by the three patient subgroups with the estimated normative data. We calculated generalised estimating equations for the whole sample to assess the longitudinal associations between cumulative neuropsychological deficits, fatigue, and psychiatric data (anxiety, depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, and apathy). Results: Most participants (>50%) exhibited a decrease in their neuropsychological impairments, while approximately 25% showed an escalation in these cognitive deficits. At T2, patients in the mild subgroup remained free of accumulated neuropsychological impairments. Patients with moderate severity of symptoms displayed a decrease in the magnitude of cumulative deficits in perceptual and attentional functions, a persistence of executive, memory and logical reasoning deficits, and the emergence of language deficits. In patients with severe symptoms, perceptual deficits emerged and executive deficits increased, while attentional and memory deficits remained unchanged. Changes in executive functions were significantly associated with changes in depressive symptoms, but the generalised estimating equations failed to reveal any other significant effect. Conclusion: While most cumulative neuropsychological deficits observed at T1 persisted and even worsened over time in the subgroups of patients with moderate and severe symptoms, a significant proportion of patients, mainly in the mild subgroup, exhibited improved performances. However, we identified heterogeneous neuropsychological profiles both cross-sectionally and over time, suggesting that there may be distinct patient phenotypes. Predictors of these detrimental dynamics have yet to be identified.

Assessment of olfactory fluctuations in a clinical context.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate whether olfactory fluctuations (OF) are pronounced in patients with sinonasal olfactory dysfunction (OD). METHODS: The retrospective investigation included patients aged 18 years or older, who consulted a tertiary referral center for olfactory loss. Patients with normal smell function were excluded. Patients answered a structured questionnaire about their olfactory symptoms, with specific questions related to the presence of OF and its average frequency, amplitude, duration, time since most recent OF, and associated symptoms of self-reported OF. Patients also underwent clinical evaluation including a structured medical history and physical examination including nasal endoscopy. In addition, we assessed orthonasal olfactory function using Sniffin' Sticks, and gustatory function using "taste sprays". RESULTS: Participants included 131 men and 205 women (n = 336), aged 18 to 86 years (mean 50, SD 16). Patient-reported fluctuations occurred most frequently in sinonasal (38%), idiopathic (29%), and postviral (29%) OD. Amplitude of OF was highest in postviral OD (p = 0.009). Average frequency, duration, and the time since the most recent fluctuation were not significantly different between groups (all p's > 0.42). Odor discrimination (p = 0.002) and identification (p = 0.017) scores were higher among those individuals with OF. CONCLUSION: Amplitude of OF may help distinguish postviral from other causes of OD, especially in patients presenting with equivocal symptoms of sinonasal disease.

Systemic corticosteroids in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related smell dysfunction: an international view.

The frequent association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and olfactory dysfunction is creating an unprecedented demand for a treatment of the olfactory loss. Systemic corticosteroids have been considered as a therapeutic option. However, based on current literature, we call for caution using these treatments in early COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction because: (1) evidence supporting their usefulness is weak; (2) the rate of spontaneous recovery of COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction is high; and (3) corticosteroids have well-known potential adverse effects. We encourage randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of systemic steroids in this indication and strongly emphasize to initially consider smell training, which is supported by a robust evidence base and has no known side effects.

Real-life assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis patients using mobile technology: The mySinusitisCoach project by EUFOREA.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with a substantial personal and socioeconomic burden. Monitoring of patient-reported outcomes by mobile technology offers the possibility to better understand real-life burden of CRS. METHODS: This study reports on the cross-sectional evaluation of data of 626 users of mySinusitisCoach (mSC), a mobile application for CRS patients. Patient characteristics of mSC users were analysed as well as the level of disease control based on VAS global rhinosinusitis symptom score and adapted EPOS criteria. RESULTS: The mSC cohort represents a heterogeneous group of CRS patients with a diverse pattern of major symptoms. Approximately half of patients reported nasal polyps. 47.3% of all CRS patients were uncontrolled based on evaluation of VAS global rhinosinusitis symptom score compared to 40.9% based on adapted EPOS criteria. The impact of CRS on sleep quality and daily life activities was significantly higher in uncontrolled versus well-controlled patients. Half of patients had a history of FESS (functional endoscopic sinus surgery) and reported lower symptom severity compared to patients without a history of FESS, except for patients with a history of more than 3 procedures. Patients with a history of FESS reported higher VAS levels for impaired smell. CONCLUSION: Real-life data confirm the high disease burden in uncontrolled CRS patients, clearly impacting quality of life. Sinus surgery improves patient-reported outcomes, but not in patients with a history of more than 3 procedures. Mobile technology opens a new era of real-life monitoring, supporting the evolution of care towards precision medicine.

Evaluating the clinical usefulness of structured questions in parosmia assessment.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Parosmia and phantosmia relate to distorted odor perceptions. Little is known about their clinical significance. Measuring phantosmia and parosmia is still not possible. Today, assessment of parosmia or phantosmia relies mainly upon the patient's interview and the physician's experience. Therefore, we investigated the clinical usefulness of four structured questions in comparison to the patient's history regarding their accuracy in terms of the presence of odor distortions. STUDY DESIGN: Tertiary care center outpatient clinic analyses. METHODS: Responses from 193 patients were analyzed. All patients underwent full olfactory work-up (ear, nose, and throat examination, Sniffin' Sticks testing, structural brain imaging) and filled in a questionnaire with four parosmia questions and six questions regarding characteristics and severity of the parosmia. These responses formed the bases of a numerical parosmia score. RESULTS: Patients with parosmia showed significantly lower parosmia scores (P <.001) when compared to either patients with phantosmia or patients without odor distortions. Two questions could be identified that showed a high association to the presence or absence of parosmia. CONCLUSIONS: The present results confirm reports on the high frequency of parosmia and phantosmia among patients suffering from olfactory disorders. A parosmia score could be established that distinguishes between patients with or without odor distortions. The score provides valuable information regarding the presence or absence of parosmia, thus helping the physician during the patient's evaluation.