Cost-Effectiveness of Using LDL-Direct Versus Lipid-Panel as Part of the Inpatient Stroke Workup.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether utilizing a LDL-direct laboratory test rather than a lipid panel to determine LDL-C as part of the inpatient stroke and TIA workup is more cost-effective to the patient and hospital system. A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients admitted to UCSD La Jolla and Hillcrest Hospital and discharged with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack between 7/2016 and 6/2019. A cost-analysis was extrapolated based on the current cost of each test as provided by the UCSD hospital billing department as of June 2020. Patients started on a statin, who were not on one prior to admission, were also analyzed to highlight the importance of an accurate LDL-C on management of dyslipidemia. RESULTS: A total of 1245 patients were included in the study with 87% representing Ischemic strokes and 13% transient ischemic attacks. Over the three-year period, a total savings of $77,545 would be achieved if LDL-direct were used in place of a lipid-panel, representing an overall cost savings of 33%. Over the same time-frame, 536 (43%) patients were started on a statin that were not previously on one. CONCLUSIONS: Ordering a LDL-direct test should be considered over a lipid panel to evaluate LDL-C as it may prove to be the most cost effective approach to both the patient and Healthcare system.

A Stroke Care Model at an Academic, Comprehensive Stroke Center During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has required the adaptation of hyperacute stroke care (including stroke code pathways) and hospital stroke management. There remains a need to provide rapid and comprehensive assessment to acute stroke patients while reducing the risk of COVID-19 exposure, protecting healthcare providers, and preserving personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. While the COVID infection is typically not a primary cerebrovascular condition, the downstream effects of this pandemic force adjustments to stroke care pathways to maintain optimal stroke patient outcomes. METHODS: The University of California San Diego (UCSD) Health System encompasses two academic, Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs). The UCSD Stroke Center reviewed the national COVID-19 crisis and implications on stroke care. All current resources for stroke care were identified and adapted to include COVID-19 screening. The adjusted model focused on comprehensive and rapid acute stroke treatment, reduction of exposure to the healthcare team, and preservation of PPE. AIMS: The adjusted pathways implement telestroke assessments as a specific option for all inpatient and outpatient encounters and accounts for when telemedicine systems are not available or functional. COVID screening is done on all stroke patients. We outline a model of hyperacute stroke evaluation in an adapted stroke code protocol and novel methods of stroke patient management. CONCLUSIONS: The overall goal of the model is to preserve patient access and outcomes while decreasing potential COVID-19 exposure to patients and healthcare providers. This model also serves to reduce the use of vital PPE. It is critical that stroke providers share best practices via academic and vetted social media platforms for rapid dissemination of tools and care models during the COVID-19 crisis.

Mechanisms Underlying the Association Between Early-Life Adversity and Physical Health: Charting a Course for the Future.

Early-life adversities (ELA) are associated with subsequent pervasive alterations across a wide range of neurobiological systems and psychosocial factors that contribute to accelerated onset of health problems and diseases. In this article, we provide an integrated perspective on recent developments in research on ELA, based on the articles published in this Special Issue of Psychosomatic Medicine. We focus on the following: 1) the distinction between specific versus general aspects of ELA with regard to the nature of exposure (e.g., physical and sexual abuse, emotional abuse or neglect, relative socioeconomic deprivation), biological and behavioral correlates of ELA, and differences across diseases; 2) the importance of timing in the critical phases of exposure to ELA; and 3) adaptive versus dysfunctional responses to ELA and their consequences for biological and behavioral risk factors for adverse health outcomes. This article concludes with outlining important new targets for research in this area, including the neurobiology of affect as a mechanism linking ELA to adverse health outcomes, and the need for large-scale longitudinal investigations of multisystem processes relevant to ELA in diverse samples, starting prenatally, continuing to late adolescence, and with long-term follow-up assessments that enable evaluation of incident disease outcomes.