Frailty, sarcopenia and mortality in cirrhosis: what is the best assessment, how to interpret the data correctly and what interventions are possible?

Cirrhosis-induced sarcopenia plays a deleterious role in patients on the waiting list of transplantation. Liver frailty index (LFI) calculation based on easy measurable clinical parameters (muscle strength and balance data) seems therefore accurate for identifying patients at risk for waiting list mortality. However, some questions remain open such as the difficult clinical testing of patients with encephalopathy, the comparison of these clinical data with the radiological evaluation of muscle quantity and quality, the attitude to adopt towards these patients identified as fragile (emergency versus futile transplantation?) and the possible benefit of interventions (nutrition and/or exercise). Finally, recent data show that the deterioration of the muscle condition occurs early prior to the development of advanced fibrosis (specifically in fatty liver disease). This underlines the interest of evaluating the muscle compartment during the pathogenesis of liver diseases, also before the emergence of cirrhosis.

Prognostic assessment of resected colorectal liver metastases integrating pathological features, RAS mutation and Immunoscore.

Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases combined with systemic treatment aims to maximize patient survival. However, recurrence rates are very high postsurgery. In order to assess patient prognosis after metastasis resection, we evaluated the main patho-molecular and immune parameters of all surgical specimens. Two hundred twenty-one patients who underwent, after different preoperative treatment, curative resection of 582 metastases were analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters, RAS tumor mutation, and the consensus Immunoscore (I) were assessed for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and time to relapse (TTR) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used for uni- and multivariate analysis. Immunoscore and clinicopathological parameters (number of metastases, surgical margin, histopathological growth pattern, and steatohepatitis) were associated with relapse in multivariate analysis. Overall, pathological score (PS) that combines relevant clinicopathological factors for relapse, and I, were prognostic for TTR (2-year TTR rate PS 0-1: 49.8.% (95% CI: 42.2-58.8) versus PS 2-4: 20.9% (95% CI: 13.4-32.8), hazard ratio (HR) = 2.54 (95% CI: 1.82-3.53), p < 0.0000; and 2-year TTR rate I 0: 25.7% (95% CI: 16.3-40.5) versus I 3-4: 60% (95% CI: 47.2-76.3), HR = 2.87 (95% CI: 1.73-4.75), p = 0.0000). Immunoscore was also prognostic for OS (HR [I 3-4 versus I 0] = 4.25, 95% CI: 1.95-9.23; p = 0.0001). Immunoscore (HR [I 3-4 versus I 0] = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.58; p = 0.0009) and RAS mutation (HR [mutated versus WT] = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.06-2.58; p = 0.0265) were significant for OS. In conclusion, PS including relevant clinicopathological parameters and Immunoscore permit stratification of stage IV colorectal cancer patient prognosis in terms of TTR and identify patients with higher risk of recurrence. Immunoscore remains the major prognostic factor for OS.