Reliability of assessment of adherence to an antimicrobial treatment guideline.

Assessment procedures for adherence to a guideline must be reliable and credible. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability of assessment of adherence, taking account of the professional backgrounds of the observers. A secondary analysis explored the impact of case characteristics on assessment. Six observers (two hospital pharmacists, two internists and two clinical microbiologists) assessed a random sample of 22 prescriptions made to infectious disease cases admitted to a department of internal medicine between February and August 2001. Agreement between observers with regard to adherence of these prescriptions to guideline recommendations concerning drug choice, duration of treatment, dosage and route of administration was measured using Cohen's kappa. Case characteristics were compared between cases where observers agreed and disagreed with two-sided Fisher's exact test. Agreement between all professionals was moderate for drug choice (0.59), fair for duration of therapy (0.36), moderate for dosage (0.48), and fair for route of administration (0.37). Agreement on drug choice was good within (0.75 and 0.83) and between (0.74) the internists and the hospital pharmacists, but was less within (0.31) the clinical microbiologists and between the clinical microbiologists and the internists (0.44) and the hospital pharmacists (0.42). Within the clinical microbiologists, agreement was good for dosage (0.79) and route of administration (0.66). There was frequent disagreement between observers regarding cases with combination therapy and non-immunocompromised patients. Despite the small number of cases, our results suggest that internists and hospital pharmacists can reliably be used to assess adherence for drug choice. The level of agreement seems to be affected by combination therapy and the immune status of the patient.

Improving compliance with hospital antibiotic guidelines: a time-series intervention analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of a combined intervention strategy to improve antimicrobial prescribing at University Hospital Groningen. For the intervention, the antimicrobial treatment guidelines were updated and disseminated in paperback and electronic format. The credibility of the guidelines was improved by consultation with users. In a second phase, academic detailing (AD) was used to improve specific areas of low compliance with the guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prescribing data were prospectively collected for 2869 patients receiving 7471 prescriptions for an antimicrobial for an infection covered by the guidelines between July 2001 and September 2003. After collection of baseline data, the guidelines were actively disseminated in February 2002. Next, after a 5 month interval, a second intervention, i.e. an AD approach, addressed suboptimal prescribing of ciprofloxacin and co-amoxiclav. Segmented regression analysis was used to analyse the interrupted time-series data. RESULTS: At baseline, compliance with the drug choice guidelines was 67%. The first intervention showed a significant change in the level of compliance of +15.5% (95% CI: 8%; 23%). AD did not lead to statistically significant additional changes in already high levels +12.5% (95% CI:-3%; 28%) of compliance. Post-intervention compliance was stable at 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Updating the guidelines in close collaboration with the specialists involved followed by active dissemination proved to be an efficient way to improve compliance with guideline recommendations. An 86% compliance level was achieved in this study without compulsory measures. A ceiling effect may have limited the added value of AD.

Antibiotic utilisation for hospitalised paediatric patients.

Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in paediatrics. Because of an overall rise in health care costs, lack of uniformity in drug prescribing and the emergence of antibiotic resistance, monitoring and control of antibiotic use is of growing concern and strict antibiotic policies are warranted. Before such policies can be implemented, detailed knowledge of antibiotic prescribing patterns is important. In this combined retrospective and prospective study the utilisation of antibiotics in a paediatric university hospital over three consecutive years has been analysed. Over an 8-week period (1 November-22 December) in 1994, 1995 and 1996 patient charts were reviewed with regard to antibiotic prescription (generic class, dose, duration and indication). A total of 1120 patients were admitted during the study periods. Antibiotics were prescribed at least once for 36% of hospitalised children, although only 12.3% of the patients receiving antibiotics had a proven bacterial infection. During a single hospitalisation 13, 4.7, 2.6, and 2.7% of all children received 2, 3, 4 or more than four antibiotics, respectively. Infants less than 2 years received antibiotics more frequently than older children (25 and 11% respectively, P=0.0256). More children admitted to the intensive care unit received antibiotics compared with patients admitted on medium care units (49.7 and 29.3% respectively, P < 0.0001). They received more often several different antibiotic courses (2.6 courses per patient versus 1.9 courses per patient, P < 0.0001). These children were also given more often intravenous rather than oral antibiotics (P < 0.0001) Significant differences could be found between the generic classes of antibiotics prescribed to children admitted to the intensive care unit and the medium care. However high variability in dose and duration of antibiotic therapy for the same clinical indication was shown. A high percentage of all hospitalised children receive antibiotics. In most cases antibiotics are started on an empirical basis, without proof of a bacterial infection, either before the start of therapy or afterwards. The fact that children admitted to intensive care units and patients of younger age groups are at special risk of receiving multiple courses of antibiotics, together with the knowledge that antibiotic resistance develops in this setting, suggest that strategies to control antibiotic use should focus on these patient populations.

Shift in antibiotic prescribing patterns in relation to antibiotic expenditure in paediatrics.

UNLABELLED: In paediatrics, antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs. Because of an overall rise in health care costs, lack of uniformity in drug prescribing and the emergence of antibiotic resistance, monitoring and control of antibiotic use is of growing concern and strict antibiotic policies are warranted. Before such a policy can be implemented, detailed knowledge of antibiotic prescribing patterns and related costs is important. In this study a shift of antibiotic prescription patterns over time is described in relation to hospital antibiotic expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable shift in prescription patterns towards more expensive and broader spectrum antibiotics occurs in paediatrics, carrying a risk for the development of antibiotic resistance among the most prevalent micro-organisms in this age group.