Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Place ; 83: 103090, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37531804

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Residential segregation is an important factor that negatively impacts cancer disparities, yet studies yield mixed results and complicate clear recommendations for policy change and public health intervention. In this study, we examined the relationship between local and Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) measures of Black isolation (segregation) and survival among older non-Hispanic (NH) Black women with breast cancer (BC) in the United States. We hypothesized that the influence of local isolation on mortality varies based on MSA isolation-specifically, that high local isolation may be protective in the context of highly segregated MSAs, as ethnic density may offer opportunities for social support and buffer racialized groups from the harmful influences of racism. METHODS: Local and MSA measures of isolation were linked by Census Tract (CT) with a SEER-Medicare cohort of 5,231 NH Black women aged 66-90 years with an initial diagnosis of stage I-IV BC in 2007-2013 with follow-up through 2018. Proportional and cause-specific hazards models and estimated marginal means were used to examine the relationship between local and MSA isolation and all-cause and BC-specific mortality, accounting for covariates (age, comorbidities, tumor stage, and hormone receptor status). FINDINGS: Of 2,599 NH Black women who died, 40.0% died from BC. Women experienced increased risk for all-cause mortality when living in either high local (HR = 1.20; CI = 1.08-1.33; p < 0.001) or high MSA isolation (HR = 1.40; CI = 1.17-1.67; p < 0.001). A similar trend existed for BC-specific mortality. Pairwise comparisons for all-cause mortality models showed that high local isolation was hazardous in less isolated MSAs but was not significant in more isolated MSAs. INTERPRETATION: Both local and MSA isolation are independently associated with poorer overall and BC-specific survival for older NH Black women. However, the impact of local isolation on survival appears to depend on the metropolitan area's level of segregation. Specifically, in highly segregated MSAs, living in an area with high local isolation is not significantly associated with poorer survival. While the reasons for this are not ascertained in this study, it is possible that the protective qualities of ethnic density (e.g., social support and buffering from experiences of racism) may have a greater role in more segregated MSAs, serving as a counterpart to the hazardous qualities of local isolation. More research is needed to fully understand these complex relationships. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Etnicidade , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Medicare , Estados Unidos , Negro ou Afro-Americano
2.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 197(1): 223-233, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36357711

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Over 50% of breast cancer patients prescribed a 5-year course of daily oral adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) are nonadherent. We investigated the role of costs and cancer medication delivery mode and other medication delivery factors on adherence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of commercially insured and Medicare advantage patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer in 2007-2015 who initiated ET. We examined the association between 12-month ET adherence (proportion of days covered by fills ≥ 0.80) and ET copayments, 90-day prescription refill use, mail order pharmacy use, number of pharmacies, and synchronization of medications. We used regression models to estimate nonadherence risk ratios adjusted for demographics (age, income, race, urbanicity), comorbidities, total medications, primary cancer treatments, and generic AI availability. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using alternative specifications for independent variables. RESULTS: Mail order users had higher adherence in both commercial and Medicare-insured cohorts. Commercially insured patients who used mail order were more likely to be adherent if they had low copayments (< $5) and 90-day prescription refills. For commercially insured patients who used local pharmacies, use of one pharmacy and better synchronized refills were also associated with adherence. Among Medicare patients who used mail order pharmacies, only low copayments were associated with adherence, while among Medicare patients using local pharmacies both low copayments and 90-day prescriptions were associated with ET adherence. CONCLUSION: Out-of-pocket costs, medication delivery mode, and other pharmacy-related medication delivery factors are associated with adherence to breast cancer ET. Future work should investigate whether interventions aimed at streamlining medication delivery could improve adherence for breast cancer patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Assistência Farmacêutica , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicare , Adesão à Medicação , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico
3.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(11): e2132917, 2021 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34735013

RESUMO

Importance: Telemedicine provides patients access to episodic and longitudinal care. Policy discussions surrounding future support for telemedicine require an understanding of factors associated with successful video visits. Objective: To assess patient and clinician factors associated with successful and with failed video visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a quality improvement study of 137 846 scheduled video visits at a single academic health system in southeastern Wisconsin between March 1 and December 31, 2020, supplemented with patient experience survey data. Patient information was gathered using demographic information abstracted from the electronic health record and linked with block-level socioeconomic data from the US Census Bureau. Data on perceived clinician experience with technology was obtained using the survey. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of interest was the successful completion of a scheduled video visit or the conversion of the video visit to a telephone-based service. Visit types and administrative data were used to categorize visits. Mixed-effects modeling with pseudo R2 values was performed to compare the relative associations of patient and clinician factors with video visit failures. Results: In total, 75 947 patients and 1155 clinicians participated in 137 846 scheduled video encounters, 17 190 patients (23%) were 65 years or older, and 61 223 (81%) patients were of White race and ethnicity. Of the scheduled video encounters, 123 473 (90%) were successful, and 14 373 (10%) were converted to telephone services. A total of 16 776 patients (22%) completed a patient experience survey. Lower clinician comfort with technology (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.28), advanced patient age (66-80 years: OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.26-0.30), lower patient socioeconomic status (including low high-speed internet availability) (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92), and patient racial and ethnic minority group status (Black or African American: OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81) were associated with conversion to telephone visits. Patient characteristics accounted for systematic components for success; marginal pseudo R2 values decreased from 23% (95% CI, 21.1%-26.1%) to 7.8% (95% CI, 6.3%-9.4%) with exclusion of patient factors. Conclusions and Relevance: As policy makers consider expanding telehealth coverage and hospital systems focus on investments, consideration of patient support, equity, and friction should guide decisions. In particular, this quality improvement study suggests that underserved patients may become disproportionately vulnerable by cuts in coverage for telephone-based services.


Assuntos
Minorias Étnicas e Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Telefone/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Agendamento de Consultas , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Comunicação por Videoconferência/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 61(6): e25-e31, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34340925

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Yearly influenza vaccination is strongly recommended at age 65 and reimbursed by Medicare without copays or deductibles at pharmacies and clinical settings. Uptake is low among patients with a high risk for influenza complications and good access to specialist care, such as recent cancer survivors. We hypothesized that more accessible pharmacies could be associated with higher immunization uptake in such patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether pharmacy access is associated with influenza vaccination in subjects recently diagnosed with breast cancer, and whether this association differs by additional risk factors for influenza complications. METHODS: We examined a cohort of patients with stage 0-III breast cancer diagnosed 2011-2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare cancer registry. All retail pharmacies in the United States were identified, and pharmacy access was measured by assessing supply and demand in each census tract using a 2-stage floating catchment area approach that accounted for pharmacy driving distances recommended by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We examined the association of pharmacy access with influenza vaccination after breast cancer diagnosis in regression models. RESULTS: More than 11% of 45,722 patients with breast cancer lived in census tracts where no pharmacies were within recommended driving distances from the population-weighted tract center. Vaccination in the year after diagnosis was less likely for patients in these very low-access tracts (adjusted odds ratio 0.92 [95% CI 0.86-0.96]), black (0.55 [0.51-0.60]) and Hispanic (0.76 [0.70-0.83]) women, and Medicaid recipients (0.74 [0.69-0.79]). Vaccination was inversely associated with per capita income in the subject's census tract, but there was no difference in the pharmacy effect by race, ethnicity, or census tract income. CONCLUSION: Very low pharmacy access is associated with modest reductions in vaccination that could be useful for policy and planning regarding vaccinator resources and outreach.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Farmácias , Farmácia , Idoso , Setor Censitário , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Medicare , Estados Unidos , Vacinação
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(25): 2749-2757, 2021 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129388

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective was to examine the relationship between contemporary redlining (mortgage lending bias on the basis of property location) and survival among older women with breast cancer in the United States. METHODS: A redlining index using Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data (2007-2013) was linked by census tract with a SEER-Medicare cohort of 27,516 women age 66-90 years with an initial diagnosis of stage I-IV breast cancer in 2007-2009 and follow-up through 2015. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between redlining and both all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, accounting for covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of non-Hispanic White, 57% of Hispanic, and 79% of non-Hispanic Black individuals lived in redlined tracts. As the redlining index increased, women experienced poorer survival. This effect was strongest for women with no comorbid conditions, who comprised 54% of the sample. For redlining index values of 1 (low), 2 (moderate), and 3 (high), as compared with 0.5 (least), hazard ratios (HRs) (and 95% CIs) for all-cause mortality were HR = 1.10 (1.06 to 1.14), HR = 1.27 (1.17 to 1.38), and HR = 1.39 (1.25 to 1.55), respectively, among women with no comorbidities. A similar pattern was found for breast cancer-specific mortality. CONCLUSION: Contemporary redlining is associated with poorer breast cancer survival. The impact of this bias is emphasized by the pronounced effect even among women with health insurance (Medicare) and no comorbid conditions. The magnitude of this neighborhood level effect demands an increased focus on upstream determinants of health to support comprehensive patient care. The housing sector actively reveals structural racism and economic disinvestment and is an actionable policy target to mitigate adverse upstream health determinants for the benefit of patients with cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Habitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Racismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Medicare , Prognóstico , Características de Residência , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(5): 550-557, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32196839

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Clinical trials have clearly documented the survival benefit of aromatase inhibitors (AIs); however, many women fail to initiate (primary nonadherence) or remain adherent to AIs (secondary nonadherence). Prior studies have found that costs impact secondary nonadherence to medications but have failed to examine primary nonadherence. The purpose of this study is to examine primary and secondary adherence following the reduction in copays due to the introduction of generic AIs. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified 50 054 women diagnosed with incident breast cancer between 2008 and 2013. We compare women whose copays would change and those whose would not, due to the receipt of cost-sharing subsidies before and after generics were introduced using a difference-in-difference (DinD) analysis. To examine primary and secondary nonadherence, we rely on a multistate model with four states (Not yet initiated, User, Not Using, and Death). We adjusted for baseline factors using inverse probability treatment weights and then simulated adherence for 36 months following diagnosis. RESULTS: The generic introduction of AIs resulted in patients initiating AIs faster (DinD = -4.7%, 95%CI = -7.0, -2.3; patients not yet initiating treatment at 6-months), being more adherent (DinD ranging in absolute increase of 8.1%-10.4%) and being less likely to not be using the therapy (DinD range in absolute decrease of 1.2% at 6 months to 8.8% at 24 months) for women that do not receive a subsidy after generics were available. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of generic alternatives to AIs significantly reduced primary and secondary nonadherence.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Aromatase/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Medicamentos Genéricos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Medicare , Modelos Teóricos , Programa de SEER , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
7.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 179(1): 57-65, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31542875

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Advanced practice providers (APPs) have increasingly become members of the oncology care team. Little is known about the scope of care that APPs are performing nationally. We determined the prevalence and extent of APP practice and examined associations between APP care and scope of practice regulations, phase of cancer care, and patient characteristics. METHODS: We performed an observational study among women identified from Medicare claims as having had incident breast cancer in 2008 with claims through 2012. Outpatient APP care included at least one APP independently billing for cancer visits/services. APP scope of practice was classified as independent, reduced, or restricted. A logistic regression model with patient-level random effects was estimated to determine the probability of receiving APP care at any point during active treatment or surveillance. RESULTS: Among 42,550 women, 6583 (15%) received APP care, of whom 83% had APP care during the surveillance phase and 41% during the treatment phase. Among women who received APP care during a given year of surveillance, the overall proportion of APP-billed clinic visits increased with each additional year of surveillance (36% in Year 1 to 61% in Year 4). Logistic regression model results indicate that women were more likely to receive APP care if they were younger, black, healthier, had higher income status, or lived in a rural county or state with independent APP scope of practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important clinical and policy-relevant findings regarding national practice patterns of APP oncology care. Among Medicare beneficiaries with incident breast cancer, 15% received outpatient oncology care that included APPs who were billing; most of this care was during the surveillance phase. Future studies are needed to define the degree of APP oncology practice and training that maximizes patient access and satisfaction while optimizing the efficiency and quality of cancer care.


Assuntos
Prática Avançada de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Oncologia , Medicare , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/etnologia
8.
Cancer Causes Control ; 30(12): 1277-1282, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31531799

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To calculate tract-level estimates of liver cancer mortality in Wisconsin and identify relationships with racial and socioeconomic variables. METHODS: County-level standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of liver cancer in Wisconsin were calculated using traditional indirect adjustment methods for cases from 2003 to 2012. Tract-level SMRs were calculated using adaptive spatial filtering (ASF). The tract-level SMRs were checked for correlations to a socioeconomic advantage index (SEA) and percent racial composition. Non-spatial and spatial regression analyses with tract-level SMR as the outcome were conducted. RESULTS: County-level SMR estimates were shown to mask much of the variance within counties across their tracts. Liver cancer mortality was strongly correlated with the percent of Black residents in a census tract and moderately associated with SEA. In the multivariate spatially-adjusted regression analysis, only Percent Black composition remained significantly associated with an increased liver cancer SMR. CONCLUSIONS: Using ASF, we developed a high-resolution map of liver cancer mortality in Wisconsin. This map provided details on the distribution of liver cancer that were inaccessible in the county-level map. These tract-level estimates were associated with several racial and socioeconomic variables.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Análise de Regressão , Wisconsin/epidemiologia
9.
Cancer ; 125(21): 3818-3827, 2019 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31287559

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer contributes substantially to the life expectancy gap between US blacks and whites, and racial cancer disparities remain stubborn to eradicate. Disparities vary geographically, suggesting that they are not inevitable. METHODS: The authors examined the relationship between housing discrimination and the size of cancer disparities across large US metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). MSA-level cancer disparities were measured using data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mortgage discrimination for each MSA was estimated using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database, and MSA racial segregation was determined using US Census data. Patterns of housing discrimination and cancer disparities were mapped, and the associations between these place-based factors and cancer disparities across MSAs were measured. RESULTS: Black-to-white cancer mortality disparities (rate ratios) varied geographically, ranging from 1.50 to 0.86; 88% of mortality ratios were >1, indicating higher mortality for blacks. In areas with greater mortgage discrimination, the gap between black and white cancer mortality rates was larger (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.32; P = .001). This relationship persisted in sex-specific analyses (males, r = 0.37; P < .001; females, r = 0.23; P = .02) and in models controlling for confounders. In contrast, segregation was inconsistently associated with disparities. Adjusting for incidence disparities attenuated, but did not eliminate, the correlation between mortgage discrimination and mortality disparities (r = 0.22-0.24), suggesting that cancer incidence and survival each account for part of the mortality disparity. CONCLUSIONS: Mortgage discrimination is associated with larger black-to-white cancer mortality disparities. Some areas are exceptions to this trend. Examination of these exceptions and of policies related to housing discrimination may offer novel strategies for explaining and eliminating cancer disparities.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Habitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Racismo/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Geografia , Habitação/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/etnologia , Racismo/prevenção & controle , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Med Care ; 56(1): 78-84, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29087982

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite clear guidelines for its use and wide adoption, no population-based study has examined the extent to which patients with early stage breast cancer are benefiting from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by being spared a potentially avoidable axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and its associated morbidity. OBJECTIVE: Examine variation in type of axillary surgery performed by surgeon volume; investigate the extent and consequences of potentially avoidable ALND. RESEARCH DESIGN/SUBJECTS: Observational study of older women with pathologically node-negative stage I-II invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery in a SEER state in 2008-2009. MEASURES: Surgeon annual volume of breast cancer cases and type of axillary surgery were determined by Medicare claims. An estimated probability of excess lymphedema due to ALND was calculated. RESULTS: Among 7686 pathologically node-negative women, 49% underwent ALND (either initially or after SLNB) and 25% were operated on by low-volume surgeons. Even after adjusting for demographic and tumor characteristics, women treated by higher volume surgeons were less likely to undergo ALND [medium volume: odds ratio, 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.82); high volume: odds ratio, 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.76)]. Potentially avoidable ALND cases were estimated to represent 21% of all expected lymphedema cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this pathologically node-negative population-based breast cancer cohort, only half underwent solely SLNB. Patients treated by low-volume surgeons were more likely to undergo ALND. Resources and guidelines on the appropriate training and competency of surgeons to assure the optimal performance of SLNB should be considered to decrease rates of potentially avoidable ALND and lymphedema.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Linfedema/etiologia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
J Cancer Surviv ; 12(2): 268-275, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29243101

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although users of aromatase inhibitors have higher total fracture risk in some randomized trials, little is known about their risk outside of clinical trials or in older higher-risk cohorts. METHODS: In a population-based retrospective cohort study, we identified all older US Medicare D prescription drug insurance plan-enrolled women who had initial breast cancer surgery in 2006-2008 and began hormonal therapy (an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or tamoxifen) within the subsequent year. Total nonvertebral and hip fractures through 2012 were identified using a validated algorithm. The association of fracture outcomes with hormonal therapy type was assessed using competing risk regression models that accounted for differences in measured baseline covariates. Treatment assignment bias was reduced using inverse probability of treatment weighting computed from propensity scores. RESULTS: Among 23,378 women taking hormonal therapy (23.2% aged 80 or over), there were 3000 total and 436 hip fractures. Although AI users were younger and had lower comorbidity, after propensity score weighting, these and other covariates were balanced. Total nonvertebral risk was higher for users of AIs compared with tamoxifen, HR 1.11 (1.02-1.21), but the small increase in risk for hip fracture was not statistically significant, HR 1.04 (0.84-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Although total nonvertebral fracture risk was higher among AI users, differences in hip fractures were not significant in a large population-based cohort of older women. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Use of aromatase inhibitors by older women is associated with high risk for nonvertebral fracture that is increased compared with use of tamoxifen. Fracture risk should be assessed among patients taking these medications.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas do Quadril/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Humanos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 34(36): 4398-4404, 2016 12 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27998232

RESUMO

Purpose To investigate the role of out-of-pocket cost supports through the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy on disparities in breast cancer hormonal therapy persistence and adherence by race or ethnicity. Methods A nationwide cohort of women age ≥ 65 years with a breast cancer operation between 2006 and 2007 and at least one prescription filled for oral breast cancer hormonal therapy was identified from all Medicare D enrollees. The association of race or ethnicity with nonpersistence (90 consecutive days with no claims for a hormonal therapy prescription) and nonadherence (medication possession rate < 80%) was examined. Survival analyses were used to account for potential differences in age, comorbidity, or intensity of other treatments. Results Among the 25,111 women in the study sample, 77% of the Hispanic and 70% of the black women received a subsidy compared with 21% of the white women. By 2 years, 69% of black and 70% of Hispanic patients were persistent compared with 61% of white patients. In adjusted analyses, patients in all three unsubsidized race or ethnicity groups had greater discontinuation than subsidized groups (white patients: hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.70 to 1.95; black patients: HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.51; Hispanic patients: HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.37 to 3.89). Racial or ethnic persistence disparities that were present for unsubsidized patients were not present or reversed among subsidized patients. All three subsidized race or ethnicity groups also had higher adherence than all three unsubsidized groups, although with the smallest difference occurring in black women. Conclusion Receipt of a prescription subsidy was associated with substantially improved persistence to breast cancer hormonal therapy among white, black, and Hispanic women and lack of racial or ethnic disparities in persistence. Given high subsidy enrollment among black and Hispanic women, policies targeted at low-income patients have the potential to also substantially reduce racial and ethnic disparities.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Medicare Part D/economia , Adesão à Medicação/etnologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Prognóstico , Grupos Raciais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
13.
Health Place ; 40: 34-43, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27173381

RESUMO

Racial health disparities continue to be a serious problem in the United States and have been linked to contextual factors, including racial segregation. In some cases, including breast cancer survival, racial disparities appear to be worsening. Using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) database, we extend current spatial analysis methodology to derive new, spatially continuous indices of (1) racial bias in mortgage lending and (2) redlining. We then examine spatial patterns of these indices and the association between these new measures and breast cancer survival among Black/African American women in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin metropolitan area. These new measures can be used to examine relationships between mortgage discrimination and patterns of disease throughout the United States.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Habitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Racismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Espacial , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Feminino , Habitação/economia , Humanos , Pesquisa , Características de Residência , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Wisconsin
14.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 107(8)2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25971298

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) substantially reduce breast cancer mortality in clinical trials, but high rates of nonadherence to these long-term oral therapies have reduced their impact outside of trials. We examined the association of generic AI availability with AI adherence among a large national breast cancer cohort. METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental prepost design, we examined the effect of generic AI introductions (7/2010 and 4/2011) on adherence among a national cohort of women with incident breast cancer in 2006 and 2007 who were enrolled in the Medicare D pharmaceutical coverage program. Medicare D claims were used to calculate AI adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio of 80% or more of eligible days, over 36 months. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated with generalized estimating equations were applied to longitudinal adherence data to control for possible confounders, including receipt of a Medicare D low-income subsidy, and to account for repeated measures. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Sixteen thousand four hundred sixty-two Medicare D enrollees were eligible. Adherence declined throughout the study. However, among women without a subsidy, the median quarterly out-of-pocket cost of anastrozole fell from $183 in the fourth quarter of 2009 to $15 in 2011, and declines in adherence were attenuated with generic AI introductions. Regression-adjusted adherence probabilities were estimated to be 5.4% higher after generic anastrozole was introduced in 2010 and 11% higher after generic letrozole/exemestane was introduced in 2011. Subsidy recipients had higher adherence rates throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of generic medications attenuated the decline in adherence to AIs over three years of treatment among breast cancer survivors not receiving low-income subsidies for Medicare D coverage.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Aromatase/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Custos de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos , Medicare , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastrozol , Androstadienos/administração & dosagem , Androstadienos/economia , Antineoplásicos/economia , Inibidores da Aromatase/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Letrozol , Nitrilas/administração & dosagem , Nitrilas/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto , Pobreza , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/economia , Estados Unidos
15.
Violence Against Women ; 21(1): 49-64, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25540251

RESUMO

We examined the association between neighborhood-level factors and intimate partner femicide (IPF) using Wisconsin Violent Death Reporting System (WVDRS) data and Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence (WCADV) reports, in concert with neighborhood-level information. After controlling for individual characteristics, neighborhood-level disadvantage was associated with a decreased likelihood of IPF status, as compared with other femicides, whereas neighborhood-level residential instability was associated with an increased likelihood of IPF status. Neighborhood plays a role in differentiating IPFs from other femicides in our study area. Our findings demonstrate the importance of multilevel strategies for understanding and reducing the burden of intimate partner violence.


Assuntos
Homicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Interpessoais , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/classificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Mapeamento Geográfico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Wisconsin
16.
J Rural Health ; 29(3): 281-93, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23802930

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A growing body of work examines the association between neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence (IPV). As in the larger literature examining the influence of place context on health, rural settings are understudied and urban and rural residential environments are rarely compared. In addition, despite increased attention to the linkages between neighborhood environment and IPV, few studies have examined the influence of neighborhood context on intimate partner femicide (IPF). In this paper, we examine the role for neighborhood-level factors in differentiating urban and rural IPFs in Wisconsin, USA. METHODS: We use a combination of Wisconsin Violent Death Reporting System (WVDRS) data and Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence (WCADV) reports from 2004 to 2008, in concert with neighborhood-level information from the US Census Bureau and US Department of Agriculture, to compare urban and rural IPFs. FINDINGS: Rates of IPF vary based on degree of rurality, and bivariate analyses show differences between urban and rural victims in race/ethnicity, marital status, country of birth, and neighborhood characteristics. After controlling for individual characteristics, the nature of the residential neighborhood environment significantly differentiates urban and rural IPFs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a different role for neighborhood context in affecting intimate violence risk in rural settings, and that different measures may be needed to capture the qualities of rural environments that affect intimate violence risk. Our findings reinforce the argument that multilevel strategies are required to understand and reduce the burden of intimate violence, and that interventions may need to be crafted for specific geographical contexts.


Assuntos
Violência Doméstica/estatística & dados numéricos , Homicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Parceiros Sexuais , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Censos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Violência Doméstica/tendências , Feminino , Homicídio/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , População Rural , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Wisconsin/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
17.
Spine J ; 12(10): 902-11, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23098615

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Readmissions within 30 days of hospital discharge are undesirable and costly. Little is known about reasons for and predictors of readmissions after elective spine surgery to help plan preventative strategies. PURPOSE: To examine readmissions within 30 days of hospital discharge, reasons for readmission, and predictors of readmission among patients undergoing elective cervical and lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patient sample includes 343,068 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent cervical and lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions from 2003 to 2007. OUTCOME MEASURES: Readmissions within 30 days of discharge, excluding readmissions for rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients were identified in Medicare claims data using validated algorithms. Reasons for readmission were classified into clinically meaningful categories using a standardized coding system (Clinical Classification Software). RESULTS: Thirty-day readmissions were 7.9% after cervical surgery and 7.3% after lumbar surgery. There was no dominant reason for readmissions. The most common reasons for readmissions were complications of surgery (26%-33%) and musculoskeletal conditions in the same area of the operation (15%). Significant predictors of readmission for both operations included older age, greater comorbidity, dual eligibility for Medicare/Medicaid, and greater number of fused levels. For cervical spine readmissions, additional risk factors were male sex, a diagnosis of myelopathy, and a posterior or combined anterior/posterior surgical approach; for lumbar spine readmissions, additional risk factors were black race, Middle Atlantic geographic region, fusion surgery, and an anterior surgical approach. Our model explained more than 60% of the variability in readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries, 30-day readmissions after elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions represent a target for improvement. Both patient factors and operative techniques are associated with readmissions. Interventions to minimize readmissions should be specific to surgical site and focus on high-risk subgroups where clinical trials of interventions may be of greatest benefit.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Medicare Part A , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vértebras Cervicais/patologia , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 18(11): 3220-7, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21861226

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Population-based studies have revealed higher mortality among breast cancer patients treated in low-volume hospitals. Other studies have demonstrated disparities in race and socioeconomic status (SES) in breast cancer survival. The purpose of our study was to determine whether nonwhite or low-SES patients are disproportionately treated in low-volume hospitals. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 2,777 Medicare breast cancer patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in 2003 participated in a survey study examining breast cancer outcomes. Information was obtained from survey responses, Medicare claims, and state tumor registry data. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, patients treated at low-volume hospitals were less likely to be white, less likely to live in an urban location, and more likely to have a low SES with less social support and live a greater distance from a high-volume hospital. Education, marital status, total household income, having additional insurance besides Medicare, population density of primary residence, and tangible support were associated with distance to the nearest high-volume hospital. On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of treatment at a low-volume hospital were being nonwhite (P = 0.003), having a lower household income (P < 0.0001), residence in a rural location (P = 0.01), and living a greater distance from a high-volume hospital (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large population-based cohort, women who were poorer, nonwhite, and who lived in a rural location or at a greater distance from a high-volume hospital were more likely to be treated at low-volume hospitals. These differences may partially explain racial and SES disparities in breast cancer outcomes.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Mastectomia , Medicare , Prognóstico , População Rural , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Cancer ; 117(2): 398-405, 2011 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20824718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The authors sought to identify socioeconomic (SES) factors associated with adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) use among a contemporary population of older breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Telephone surveys were conducted among women (ages 65-89 years) residing in 4 states (California, Florida, Illinois, and New York) who underwent initial breast cancer surgery in 2003. Demographic, SES, and treatment information was collected. RESULTS: Of 2191 women, 67% received adjuvant HT with either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI); 71% of those women were on an AI. When adjusting for multiple demographic and SES factors, predictors of HT use were better education (high school degree or higher), better informational/emotional support, and younger age (ages 65-79 years). Race/ethnicity, income, and insurance coverage for medication costs were not associated with receiving HT. For those on HT, when adjusting for all other factors, women were more likely to receive an AI if they had insurance coverage for some or all medication costs, if they were wealthier, if they had better informational/emotional support, and if they were younger (ages 65-69 years). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of older women in this population-based cohort received adjuvant HT, and the adoption of AIs was early. The results indicted that providers should be aware that a woman's education level and support system influence her decision to take HT. Given the high cost of AIs, their benefits in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and the current finding that women with no insurance coverage for medication costs were significantly less likely to receive an AI, we recommend that policymakers address this issue.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Sobreviventes , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Apoio Social
20.
Am J Epidemiol ; 172(6): 637-44, 2010 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20660123

RESUMO

Subject recruitment for epidemiologic studies is associated with major challenges due to privacy laws now common in many countries. Privacy policies regarding recruitment methods vary tremendously across institutions, partly because of a paucity of information about what methods are acceptable to potential subjects. The authors report the utility of an opt-out method without prior physician notification for recruiting community-dwelling US women aged 65 years or older with incident breast cancer in 2003. Participants (n = 3,083) and possibly eligible nonparticipants (n = 2,664) were compared using characteristics derived from billing claims. Participation for persons with traceable contact information was 70% initially (2005-2006) and remained over 90% for 3 follow-up surveys (2006-2008). Older subjects and those living in New York State were less likely to participate, but participation did not differ on the basis of socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, underlying health, or type of cancer treatment. Few privacy concerns were raised by potential subjects, and no complaints were lodged. Using opt-out methods without prior physician notification, a population-based cohort of older breast cancer subjects was successfully recruited. This strategy may be applicable to population-based studies of other diseases and is relevant to privacy boards making decisions about recruitment strategies acceptable to the public.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Confidencialidade , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Seleção de Pacientes , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Feminino , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA