Avaliação da percepção dos professores sobre educação interprofissional em saúde por meio de grupos focais / Evaluación de la percepción de los profesores sobre educación interprofesional en salud por medio de grupos focales / Assessment of professors' perception about the interprofessional education in health using focus groups

Este estudo avalia a percepção de docentes de uma universidade pública brasileira sobre educação interprofissional (EIP). Professores de Medicina, Odontologia e Enfermagem participaram de grupos focais on-line síncronos refletindo sobre os seguintes tópicos: (1) disciplinas em comum; (2) projetos interprofissionais de pesquisa e extensão; (3) atenção aos determinantes sociais nos planos de tratamento aos usuários; e (4) práticas colaborativas durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Foi usada análise interpretativa descritiva para avaliar quatro grupos focais (n = 10) utilizando instrumento estruturado com 17 itens acerca dos quatro tópicos mencionados. Segundo os docentes, não existem disciplinas comuns entre os cursos da Saúde. Projetos de extensão e de pesquisa com abordagem interprofissional acontecem somente por poucas iniciativas individuais de professores. Segundo os participantes, os alunos consideram os determinantes sociais nos planos de tratamento. Ocorreram poucas práticas colaborativas durante a pandemia. Observou-se a necessidade de orientações sobre EIP para graduação.(AU)

Este estudio evalúa la percepción de docentes de una universidad pública brasileña sobre educación interprofesional (EIP). Profesores de Medicina, Odontología y Enfermería participaron en grupos focales on-line síncronos reflexionando sobre tópicos: (1) asignaturas en común, (2) proyectos interprofesionales de investigación y extensión, (3) atención a los factores determinantes sociales en los planes de tratamiento a los usuarios, y (4) prácticas colaborativas durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Se utilizó el análisis interpretativo descriptivo para evaluar cuatro grupos focales (n=10) utilizando instrumento estructurado con 17 ítems sobre los 4 tópicos mencionados. Según los docentes, no existen asignaturas comunes entre los cursos de la salud. Los proyectos de extensión y de investigación con abordaje interprofesional constituyen unas pocas iniciativas individuales de profesores. Según los participantes, los alumnos consideran los factores determinantes sociales en los planes de tratamiento. Hubo pocas prácticas colaborativas durante la pandemia. Se observó la necesidad de orientaciones sobre EIP para graduación.(AU)

This study evaluates the perception of professors on interprofessional education (IPE) from a public university in Brazil. Professors of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing participated in synchronous online focus groups reflecting on topics: (1) common disciplines, (2) interprofessional research and extension projects, (3) attention to social determinants in user treatment plans, and (4) collaborative practices during the Covid-19 pandemic. An accurate focus group transcription and interpretative descriptive analysis were used to assess four focus groups (n=10) using a structured instrument with 17 items about the 4 topics mentioned. According to professors, there are no common disciplines among health courses. Extension and research projects with an interprofessional approach are only individual initiatives by professors. According to participants, students consider social determinants in treatment plans. There were few collaborative practices during the pandemic. There was a need for IPE guidelines for graduation.(AU)

Oral status, sense of coherence, religious-spiritual coping, socio-economic characteristics, and quality of life in young patients.

BACKGROUND: Several factors can influence the oral health. AIM: To explore the clinical factors, individual characteristics, and environmental factors (religious-spiritual coping-RSC, sense of coherence [SOC], and socio-economic status) related to oral status and impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of children/adolescents (C/A). DESIGN: This study evaluated C/A up to 15 years old and their caregivers. Number of decayed (NDT) and missing teeth (NMT); history of dental trauma; caregiver's RSC and SOC, socio-economic factors, and OHRQoL were evaluated. Theoretical model exploring the direct and indirect effects was tested using a structural equation analysis. RESULTS: For younger group (0-6 years), having more NDT or more NMT had a greater impact on the OHRQoL (ß = 0.382, ß = 0.203, respectively). In the oldest group (7-15 years), a higher SOC had an inverse relationship with the impact on the family OHRQoL (ß=-0.201). The higher the age of the C/A, the lower the NDT (ß=-0.235), and the higher the family income the lower, the need for social benefit (ß = 0.275). Indirect relationships were observed between schooling with social benefit and OHRQoL in younger group. The family income indirectly influenced the OHRQoL in oldest group. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life is affected directly and indirectly by environmental characteristics, oral status, and the age of patients.

Aspectos sociodemograficos e clinicos da qualidade de vida relacionada a saude bucal em adolescentes / Aspectos sociodemogragicos y clinicos de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud bucal en adolescentes / Sociodemographic and clinical aspects of quality of life related to oral health in adolescents

OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência e identificar fatores sociodemográficos e parâmetros bucais associados ao impacto negativo da condição bucal na qualidade de vida de adolescentes. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados dados de 5.445 adolescentes entre 15 e 19 anos que participaram do inquérito nacional de saúde bucal (SBBrasil 2010), considerando a complexidade do desenho amostral. O desfecho foi a qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal, avaliada por meio do questionário Oral Impacts on Daily Performance e analisada de forma discreta. As variáveis de exposição foram sexo, cor da pele, escolaridade, renda familiar, idade, cárie não tratada, perda dentária, dor de dente, oclusopatias, sangramento gengival, cálculo dentário e bolsa periodontal. Foram conduzidas análises de regressão de Poisson e apresentadas as razões de médias (RM), com respectivos intervalos de 95% de confiança (IC95%). RESULTADOS: Dos pesquisados, 39,4% relataram pelo menos um impacto negativo na qualidade de vida. Após o ajuste, a média do impacto negativo foi de 1,52 (IC95%1,16;2,00) vez maior no sexo feminino e 1,42 (IC95% 1,01;1,99), 2,66 (IC95% 1,40;5,07) e 3,32 (IC95% 1,68;6,56) vezes maior nos pardos, amarelos e indígenas, respectivamente, em relação aos brancos. Quanto menor a escolaridade, maior a média de impacto negativo (RM 2,11, IC95% 1,30;3,41), assim como em indivíduos com renda familiar até R$ 500,00 (RM 1,84, IC95% 1,06;3,17) comparados aos de maior renda. Encontrou-se maior impacto na qualidade de vida entre adolescentes com quatro ou mais lesões de cáries não tratadas (RM 1,53, IC95% 1,12;2,10), uma ou mais perdas dentárias (RM 1,44, IC95%1,16;1,80), com dor de dente (RM 3,62, IC95% 2,93;4,46) e com oclusopatia grave (RM 1,52, IC95% 1,04;2,23) e muito grave (RM 1,32, IC95% 1,01;1,72). ...

OBJETIVO: Estimar la prevalencia e identificar factores sociodemográgicos y parámetros bucales asociados con el impacto negativo de la condición bucal en la calidad de vida de adolescentes. MÉTODOS: Se analizaron datos de 5.445 adolescentes entre 15 y 19 años que participaron de la pesquisa nacional de salud bucal (SBBrasil 2010), considerando la complejidad del diseño de muestreo. El resultado fue la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud bucal, evaluada por medio de cuestionario Oral Impacts on Daily Performance y analizada de forma discreta. Las variables de exposición fueron sexo, color de la piel, escolaridad, renta familiar, edad, caries no tratada, pérdida dentaria, dolor de diente, maloclusiones, sangramiento de encías, cálculo dentario y bolsa periodontal. Se efectuaron análisis de regresión de Poisson y se presentaron los cocientes de promedios (RM), con sus respectivos intervalos de 95% de confianza (IC95%), RESULTADOS: Entre los investigados, 39,4% relataron por lo menos un impacto negativo en la calidad de vida. Posterior al ajuste, el promedio del impacto negativo fue de 1,52 (IC95% 1,16;2,00) veces mayor en el sexo femenino y 1,42 (IC95% 1,01;1,99), 2,66 (IC95%1,40;5,07) y 3,32 (IC95%1,68;6,56) veces mayor en los pardos, amarillos e indígenas, respectivamente, con relación a los blancos. En la medida que disminuye la escolaridad, mayor el promedio del impacto negativo (RM 2,11, IC95%1,30;3,41), así como en individuos con renta familiar hasta R$ 500,00 (RM 1,84, IC95%1,06;3,17) en comparación con los de mayor renta. Se encontró mayor impacto en la calidad de vida entre adolescentes con cuatro o más lesiones de caries no tratadas (RM1,53, IC95%1,12;2,10), una o más pérdidas dentarias (RM1,44, IC95%1,16;1,80), con dolor de diente (RM3,62, IC95%2,93;4,46), y con maloclusión grave (RM1,52, IC95%1,04;2,23) y muy grave ...

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and to identify sociodemographic and oral health factors associated with the negative impact of oral health conditions on the quality of life in adolescents. METHODS: Data from 5,445 adolescents aged 15-19, who took part in the Brazilian Oral Health Survey (SBBrasil 2010) were analyzed, using a multistage sampling design. The outcome was quality of life related to oral health, which was assessed using the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance questionnaire and analyzed as a discrete variable. The independent variables were sex, skin color, schooling, household income, age, untreated dental caries, malocclusion.,gingival bleeding, dental calculus, and periodontal pocket. Poisson regression analysis was carried out and mean ratios (MR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were presented. RESULTS: Of the total, 39.4% reported at least one negative impact on their quality of life. After adjustment, the mean negative impact was 1.52 (95%CI 1.16;2.00) times higher in females and 1.42 (95%CI 1.01;1.99), 2.66 (95%CI 1.40;5.07) and 3.32 (95%CI 1.68;6.56) higher in those with brown, yellow, and indigenous skin color, respectively, when compared to those with white skin. The lower the level of schooling, the greater the negative impact (MR 2.11, 95%CI 1.30;3.41), likewise for individuals with household income below R$ 500.00 (MR 1.84, 95%CI 1.06;3.17) compared with those with higher incomes. The greatest impact on quality of life was found among adolescents with four or more teeth with untreated dental caries (MR 1.53, 95%CI 1.12;2.10), one or more missing teeth (MR 1.44. 95%CI 1.16;1.80). those with dental pain (RM 3.62, 95%CI 2.93;4.46) and with severe (MR 1.52, 95%CI 1.04;2.23) and very severe malocclusion (MR 1.32, 95%CI 1.01;1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Brazilian adolescents reported a high negative impact of oral health on their quality of life. Inequalities in distribution should be taken ...

[Sociodemographic and clinical aspects of quality of life related to oral health in adolescents]. / Aspectos sociodemográficos e clínicos da qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal em adolescentes.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and to identify sociodemographic and oral health factors associated with the negative impact of oral health conditions on the quality of life in adolescents. METHODS: Data from 5,445 adolescents aged 15-19, who took part in the Brazilian Oral Health Survey (SBBrasil 2010) were analyzed, using a multistage sampling design. The outcome was quality of life related to oral health, which was assessed using the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance questionnaire and analyzed as a discrete variable. The independent variables were sex, skin color, schooling, household income, age, untreated dental caries, malocclusion.,gingival bleeding, dental calculus, and periodontal pocket. Poisson regression analysis was carried out and mean ratios (MR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were presented. RESULTS: Of the total, 39.4% reported at least one negative impact on their quality of life. After adjustment, the mean negative impact was 1.52 (95%CI 1.16;2.00) times higher in females and 1.42 (95%CI 1.01;1.99), 2.66 (95%CI 1.40;5.07) and 3.32 (95%CI 1.68;6.56) higher in those with brown, yellow, and indigenous skin color, respectively, when compared to those with white skin. The lower the level of schooling, the greater the negative impact (MR 2.11, 95%CI 1.30;3.41), likewise for individuals with household income below R$ 500.00 (MR 1.84, 95%CI 1.06;3.17) compared with those with higher incomes. The greatest impact on quality of life was found among adolescents with four or more teeth with untreated dental caries (MR 1.53, 95%CI 1.12;2.10), one or more missing teeth (MR 1.44. 95%CI 1.16;1.80). those with dental pain (RM 3.62, 95%CI 2.93;4.46) and with severe (MR 1.52, 95%CI 1.04;2.23) and very severe malocclusion (MR 1.32, 95%CI 1.01;1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Brazilian adolescents reported a high negative impact of oral health on their quality of life. Inequalities in distribution should be taken into account when planning preventive, monitoring and treatment strategies for oral health problems in groups with the highest impact on their quality of life.

Initial assessment of responsiveness of the P-CPQ (Brazilian Version) to describe the changes in quality of life after treatment for traumatic dental injury.

This study aimed to assess the responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the Parental-Caregiver Perception Questionnaire (B-P-CPQ) to describe changes in quality of life (QoL) after treatment for traumatic dental injury (TDI). After eligibility criteria were applied, 42 of 255 patients who went to a dental trauma center for TDI treatment were included. QoL was evaluated in two different appointments: A1 (after TDI) and A2 (after TDI treatment). The B-P-CPQ scores were calculated using the additive method. Psychometric properties like internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha), test-retest reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity (Spearman's correlations) were assessed, and, mainly, the responsiveness was analyzed by standardized response means (SRM). Mean B-P-CPQ scores were 30.05 (1.74 SD) and 2.67 (4.05 SD), while the median scores were 17.39 and 2.00 (P < 0.01), respectively in A1 and A2. Cronbach's Alpha was 0.87 in A1 and 0.66 in A2. ICC was 0.90. B-P-CPQ scores were correlated with overall well-being (P < 0.01; rho: 0.71). The B-P-CPQ responsiveness scores declined 27.38 points, and a perfect SRM of 1.76 was achieved. The B-P-CPQ scores indicated changes in QoL following TDI. The change was observed as an impact decrease after TDI treatment, demonstrating positive reduction and improvement on QoL. The responsiveness of the P-CPQ (Brazilian version) in detecting change on QoL after TDI treatment was confirmed by SRM assessment. The findings represent an evidence of the importance of professional care and treatment of TDI.

Periodontal bacterial load: a proposed new epidemiological method for periodontal disease assessment.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify a periodontal clinical measure that correlates with red complex bacteria usually associated with periodontal disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Periodontal clinical parameters were recorded in 116 postpartum women at six sites per tooth for all teeth excluding third molars. Two subgingival plaque samples per subject were collected and analyzed for 39 bacterial species using the Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. Periodontal Bacterial Load (PBL) was calculated as the sum of all pocket depth measurements of 4 mm at sites with a Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) of 4 mm. The association of clinical and bacterial scores was analyzed using the Spearman correlation coefficient and the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The PBL was correlated with microorganisms from the red complex that included Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola, individually or grouped (p<0.05). The PBL was not associated with periodontally beneficial species from the yellow, green, purple, and blue complexes (p>0.05). The proportions and mean counts of the red complex were increased according to the quartile groups of distribution of the PBL. CONCLUSION: PBL appears to be a reliable measure of periodontal status in postpartum women. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: PBL avoids bias in the assessment of periodontal status in studies of periodontal disease.

Adaptação transcultural de índices de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal / Cross-cultural adaptation of quality of life indices for oral health

O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar criticamente o processo de adaptação transcultural dos principais instrumentos de qualidade de vida relacionados à saúde bucal. Foram realizadas buscas nas bases de dados bibliográficos LILACS e MEDLINE, com o intuito de encontrar estudos que se propuseram a adaptar instrumentos para mensuração de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal para culturas diferentes daquela em que o instrumento original foi desenvolvido. Vinte e nove artigos foram avaliados. Foi verificada grande disparidade nos métodos empregados para adaptar instrumentos de mensuração de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal, o que limita a futura utilização dos indicadores não adaptados corretamente, uma vez que eles podem não representar uma medida correta da saúde dessa população.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cross-cultural adaptation of the main quality of life instruments related to oral health. Studies on cross-cultural adaptation of oral health-related quality of life measures were searched for in LILACS and MEDLINE. Twenty-nine articles were analyzed, identifying distinct methods for cross-cultural adaptation of oral health-related quality of life measures. Such differences could jeopardize the future use of these instruments, since the instruments may not adequately represent the health status of the respective target populations.

Partial recording protocols for periodontal disease assessment in epidemiological surveys / Protocolos de registros parciais para avaliação da doença periodontal em levantamentos epidemiológicos

The objective of the present study was to compare the reliability of four partial-mouth protocols for assessing shallow, moderate, and deep sites for periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment levels. Periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment level measurements were recorded for 156 subjects (age > 30). The four models of partial-mouth protocols compared were: Model I: all sites per tooth in the random half-mouth protocol randomly selecting one maxillary and mandibular quadrant, Model II: buccal sites in a full-mouth protocol, Model III: buccal sites in the random half-mouth protocol randomly selecting one maxillary and mandibular quadrant, Model IV: all sites per tooth using Community Periodontal Index teeth. In comparison with full mouth examination, Model I did not show significant differences for periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment level parameters. Models II and III were different for some periodontal pocket depth means, and Model IV significantly overestimated all clinical parameters related to periodontal disease. Model I appears to be adequate to substitute for the full-mouth examination to assess the prevalence and severity of chronic periodontal disease in adults.

O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a confiabilidade para medidas periodontais de profundidade de bolsa à sondagem e nível clínico de inserção de quatro protocolos de registros parciais. Exames periodontais completos foram realizados em 156 indivíduos com idade > 30 anos. Quatro protocolos foram comparados ao exame periodontal completo: Modelo I: protocolo de dois quadrantes aleatórios, um superior e um inferior (seis sítios por dente), Modelo II: protocolo de quatro quadrantes (três sítios vestibulares por dente), Modelo III: protocolo de dois quadrantes aleatórios, um superior e um inferior (três sítios vestibulares por dente), Modelo IV: protocolo de seis sítios por dente nos dentes índices do índice Periodontal Comunitário. Ao comparar com o exame periodontal completo, o Modelo I não apresentou diferenças para nenhum dos parâmetros periodontais, os Modelos II e III foram diferentes em algumas médias de profundidade de bolsa à sondagem. O Modelo IV superestimou todos os parâmetros clínicos associados à doença periodontal. O Modelo I pareceu ser apropriado para substituir o exame periodontal completo para caracterização da prevalência e severidade da periodontite crônica em populações adultas.

Partial recording protocols for periodontal disease assessment in epidemiological surveys.

The objective of the present study was to compare the reliability of four partial-mouth protocols for assessing shallow, moderate, and deep sites for periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment levels. Periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment level measurements were recorded for 156 subjects (age > or = 30). The four models of partial-mouth protocols compared were: Model I: all sites per tooth in the random half-mouth protocol randomly selecting one maxillary and mandibular quadrant, Model II: buccal sites in a full-mouth protocol, Model III: buccal sites in the random half-mouth protocol randomly selecting one maxillary and mandibular quadrant, Model IV: all sites per tooth using Community Periodontal Index teeth. In comparison with full mouth examination, Model I did not show significant differences for periodontal pocket depth and clinical attachment level parameters. Models II and III were different for some periodontal pocket depth means, and Model IV significantly overestimated all clinical parameters related to periodontal disease. Model I appears to be adequate to substitute for the full-mouth examination to assess the prevalence and severity of chronic periodontal disease in adults.