Racial disparities in thoracic aortic surgery: Myth or reality?

OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between Black or White race and adverse outcomes in patients who underwent surgery of the ascending aorta, aortic root, or aortic arch at our center. METHODS: We analyzed 2335 consecutive patients who identified as Black (n = 217, 9.3%) or White (n = 2118, 90.7%) and underwent proximal aortic surgery. Patient zip codes were used to determine community socioeconomic (CSE) characteristics. The composite adverse outcome comprised mortality, persistent neurologic injury, and renal failure necessitating dialysis at discharge. We performed multivariable analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and propensity score matching adjusted for CSE factors. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 3.7 years. Compared with White patients, Black patients lived in areas characterized by a higher percentage living below poverty level, lower income, and lower education level (P < .0001). Black patients had higher rates of emergency presentation (P < .0001) and lower 5- and 10-year survival rates (P = .0002). Short-term outcomes were similar between groups, except for respiratory failure and length of stay (P < .0001), which were higher in the Black population. After propensity score matching adjusted for CSE factors, Black and White patients (n = 204 each) had similar short-term outcomes and 5- and 10-year survival rates (P = .30). Multivariable analysis stratified by race showed that CSE factors independently predicted adverse outcomes in Black but not White patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is among few studies that have analyzed the relationship between race and proximal aortic surgery. Although outcomes were similar between Black and White patients in our cohort after adjusting for CSE factors, unfavorable CSE factors predicted adverse outcomes in Black but not White patients. More patient-specific studies are needed.

Surgical research journals - Under review: An assessment of diversity among editorial boards and outcomes of peer review.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed racism as a public health crisis embedded in structural processes. Editors of surgical research journals pledged their commitment to improve structure and process through increasing diversity in the peer review and editorial process; however, little benchmarking data are available. METHODS: A survey of editorial board members from high impact surgical research journals captured self-identified demographics. Analysis of manuscript submissions from 2016 to 2020 compared acceptance for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-focused manuscripts to overall rates. RESULTS: 25.6% of respondents were female, 2.9% Black, and 3.3% Hispanic. There was variation in the diversity among journals and in the proportion of DEI submissions they attract, but no clear correlation between DEI acceptance rates and board diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Diversity among board members reflects underrepresentation of minorities seen among surgeons nationally. Recruitment and retention of younger individuals, representing more diverse backgrounds, may be a strategy for change. DEI publication rates may benefit from calls for increasing DEI scholarship more so than changes to the peer review process.

Incidence, Cost, and Risk Factors for Readmission After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Readmissions adversely affect hospital reimbursement and quality measures. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, cost, and risk factors for readmission following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We queried the National Readmissions Database and isolated patients who underwent CABG from 2013 to 2014. We determined the top reasons for readmission and compared demographics, comorbidities, in-hospital outcomes, and costs between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients. Generalized linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors for readmission. RESULTS: We identified 288,059 patients who underwent isolated CABG in the United States between 2013 and 2014. A total of 12.2% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Postoperative infection, heart failure, and arrhythmia were the most common reasons for readmission. The median time to readmit was 11 days, with a length of stay (LOS) of 6 days and a cost of $13,499 ± $201. Independent preoperative predictors for readmission were Medicaid status (odds ratio [OR], 1.33), female sex (OR, 1.32), chronic renal failure (OR, 1.26), greater than 4 Elixhauser comorbidities (OR, 1.20), chronic pulmonary disease (OR, 1.15), and nonelective operation (OR, 1.10) (all p < 0.05). In-hospital predictors included LOS greater than 10 days (OR, 1.52), acute kidney injury (OR, 1.30), atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.20), pneumonia (OR, 1.13), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (OR, 1.43) (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day readmissions after CABG are frequent and related to preoperative comorbidities and complex postoperative course. Medicaid status, prolonged LOS, and disposition to a skilled nursing facility are strong predictors for 30-day readmission following CABG. Readmission reduction efforts should consider improvements for patients in these cohorts.

An Academic Relative Value Unit System for Incentivizing the Academic Productivity of Surgery Faculty Members.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate a new academic relative-value unit (aRVU) scoring system linked to faculty compensation and analyze its association with overall departmental academic productivity. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Faculty are often not incentivized or financially compensated for educational and research activities crucial to the academic mission. METHODS: We launched an online, self-reporting aRVU system in 2015 to document and incentivize the academic productivity of our faculty. The system captured 65 specific weighted scores in 5 major categories of research, education, innovation, academic service, and peer review activities. The aRVU scores were rank-aggregated annually, and bonuses were distributed to faculty members in 3 tiers: top 10%, top third, and top half. We compared pre-aRVU (academic year 2015) to post-aRVU (academic year 2017) departmental achievement metrics. RESULTS: Since 2015, annual aRVU bonuses totaling $493,900 were awarded to 59 faculty members (58% of eligible department faculty). Implementing aRVUs was associated with significant increases in several key departmental academic achievement metrics: presentations (579 to 862; P = 0.02; 49% increase), publications (390 to 446; P = 0.02; 14%), total research funding ($4.6 M to $8.4 M; P < 0.001; 83%), NIH funding ($0.6 M to $3.4 M; P < 0.001; 467%), industry-sponsored clinical trials (8 to 23; P = 0.002; 188%), academic society committee positions (226 to 298; P < 0.001; 32%), and editorial leadership positions (50 to 74; P = 0.01; 48%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an aRVU system was associated with increases in departmental academic productivity. Although other factors undoubtedly contributed to these increases, an aRVU program may represent an important mechanism for tracking and rewarding academic productivity in surgery departments.

Nationwide trends and regional/hospital variations in open versus endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been gaining popularity for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). We used a nonvoluntary database to examine national trends and regional/hospital variations in the use of TEVAR and open thoracic aortic repair (OTAR) for TAAA. METHODS: From the 2005-2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we identified all patients with the diagnosis of TAAA who were treated with TEVAR or OTAR. Rates of these procedures were compared between years, across geographic regions, and between hospitals of various bed sizes. RESULTS: Over the study period, the rate of OTAR remained relatively stable (range, 7.5/100 patients in 2005 to 10.1/100 patients in 2008; P = .26), whereas the rate of TEVAR increased dramatically (range, 1.4/100 patients in 2005 to 6.3/100 patients in 2008; P < .0001). In 2008, 29% (211) of all TEVAR procedures and 11% (130) of all OTAR procedures were performed in western regions of the United States (P = .03). Additionally, 13% (95) of all TEVAR procedures and 3% (35) of all OTAR procedures were performed in smaller hospitals (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of TEVAR for TAAA repair increased significantly over the study period, whereas OTAR rates remained relatively stable. Our findings suggest that more patients who were otherwise not surgical candidates or did not have traditional surgical indications for OTAR were treated with TEVAR, most commonly in regions or hospitals where OTAR is less often performed. Given the complexity of TAAA cases, these results may have significant implications for patient safety in the current era of heightened health care scrutiny.

Impact of functional status on survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in a veteran population.

BACKGROUND: Although functional impairment has been shown to be an adverse outcome of frailty, little is known of its effect on patients after cardiac operations. We aimed to assess the effect of limited functional status on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: We reviewed prospectively gathered data from 1,503 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG between 1997 and 2009. We compared the outcomes of 318 patients with limited functional status and 1,185 patients without any functional impairment. The mean follow-up period was 65 months (range, 1 to 157 months). We assessed the relationship between functional status impairment and long-term survival by Cox regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors. RESULTS: Functionally impaired patients were slightly older (63±9 vs 62±8 years, p=0.05) and had more risk factors for adverse outcomes than patients who were functionally unimpaired. After adjustment for potential confounding variables by multivariate logistic regression analysis, preoperative limited functional status was not an independent predictor (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) of 30-day mortality (1.4 [0.3 to 5.8], p=0.67) or major adverse cardiac events (1.3 [0.5 to 3.3], p=0.71), nor was it predictive of reduced long-term survival (10-year hazard ratio 1.0 [0.7 to 1.4], p=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Limited functional status was not an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications or death. Long-term survival in patients whose functional status was impaired before they underwent CABG was similar to that of patients who were functionally independent.

Outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting at teaching hospitals versus nonteaching hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: Hospitals with a high volume and academic status produce better patient outcomes than other hospitals after complex surgical procedures. Risk models show that concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting pose a greater risk than isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement. We examined the relationship of hospital teaching status and the presence of a thoracic surgery residency program with aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes. METHODS: By using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients who underwent concomitant aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting from 1998 to 2007 at nonteaching hospitals, teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program, and teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify intergroup differences. Risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and complication rates. RESULTS: The 3 groups of patients did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics. Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting had higher overall risk-adjusted complication rates in nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.80; P < .0001) and teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.60; P < .0001) than in thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. However, no difference was observed in the adjusted mortality rate for nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.04; P = .25) or teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.08; P = .98) when compared with thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. Robust statistical models were used for analysis, with c-statistics of 0.98 (complications) and 0.82 (mortality). CONCLUSION: Patients who require complex cardiac operations may have better outcomes when treated at teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program.

Superior nationwide outcomes of endovascular versus open repair for isolated descending thoracic aortic aneurysm in 11,669 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) was introduced in 2005 to treat descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Little is known about TEVAR's nationwide effect on patient outcomes. We evaluated nationwide data regarding the short-term outcomes of TEVAR and open aortic repair (OAR) procedures performed in the United States during a 2-year period. METHODS: From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample data, we identified patients who had undergone surgery for an isolated descending thoracic aortic aneurysm from 2006 to 2007. Patients with aneurysm rupture, aortic dissection, vasculitis, connective tissue disorders, or concomitant aneurysms in other aortic segments were excluded. Of the remaining 11,669 patients, 9106 had undergone conventional OAR and 2563 had undergone TEVAR. Hierarchic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of TEVAR versus OAR after adjusting for confounding factors. The primary outcomes were mortality and the hospital length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcomes were the discharge status, morbidity, and hospital charges. RESULTS: The patients who had undergone TEVAR were older (69.5 ± 12.7 vs 60.2 ± 14.2 years; P < .001) and had higher Deyo comorbidity scores (4.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.8; P < .001). The unadjusted LOS was shorter for the TEVAR patients (7.7 ± 11 vs 8.8 ± 7.9 days), but the unadjusted mortality was similar (TEVAR 2.3% vs OAR 2.3%; P = 1.0). The proportion of nonelective interventions was similar between the 2 groups (TEVAR 15.9% vs OAR 15.8%; P = .9). The TEVAR and OAR techniques produced similar risk-adjusted mortality rates; however, the TEVAR patients had 60% fewer complications overall (odds ratio, 0.39; P < .001) and a shorter LOS (by 1.3 days). The TEVAR patients' hospital charges were greater by $6713 (95% confidence interval $1869 to $11,556; P < .001). However, the TEVAR patients were 4 times more likely to have a routine discharge to home. CONCLUSIONS: The nationwide data on TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms have associated this procedure with better in-hospital outcomes than OAR, even though TEVAR was selectively performed in patients who were almost 1 decade older than the OAR patients. Compared with OAR, TEVAR was associated with a shorter hospital LOS and fewer complications but significantly greater hospital charges.

The July effect: impact of the beginning of the academic cycle on cardiac surgical outcomes in a cohort of 70,616 patients.

BACKGROUND: Because surgical residents' level of experience may be at its nadir early in the academic year, academic seasonality-or the "July effect"-could affect cardiac surgical outcomes. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program were used to identify 70,616 consecutive cardiac surgical procedures performed between October 1997 and October 2007. Morbidity and mortality rates were compared between early (July 1 to August 31, n = 11,975) and late (September 1 to June 30, n = 58,641) periods in the academic year. A prediction model was constructed by using stepwise logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The two patient groups had similar demographic and risk variables. Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting accounted for 76.7% of early-period procedures and 75.8% of later-period procedures (p = 0.03). Morbidity rates did not differ significantly between the early (14.0%) and later periods (14.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.07; p = 0.67) and operative mortality was similar, 3.7% vs 3.9% (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.11; p = 0.90). The early portion of the year was associated with longer cardiac ischemia times (84 +/- 40 vs 83 +/- 42 minutes), cardiopulmonary bypass times (126 +/-52 vs 124 +/-56 minutes), and total surgical times (295 +/- 90 vs 288 +/- 90 minutes; p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The early part of the academic year was associated with slightly longer operative times; however, risk-adjusted outcomes were similar in both periods. This finding should lessen concerns about the quality of cardiac surgical care at the beginning of the academic year.

Does the level of experience of residents affect outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery?

BACKGROUND: At our institution, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations are performed by staff surgeons or by first- or second-year cardiothoracic residents under the direct supervision of attending surgeons. We evaluated the influence of surgical seniority on outcomes. METHODS: Using prospectively collected data from our departmental database, we identified all primary, isolated CABG operations (n = 1,042) performed between July 1997 and April 2007. Operations were then stratified according to the seniority of the primary surgeon: first-year cardiothoracic resident (CT1), second-year cardiothoracic resident (CT2), or staff surgeon. Data were examined for any association between seniority and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Staff, CT2, and CT1 surgeons performed 47 (4%), 610 (59%), and 385 (37%) cases, respectively. Efficiency was correlated with experience: for CT1, CT2, and staff surgeons, respectively, operative times averaged 345, 313, and 302 minutes; perfusion times averaged 118, 106, and 96 minutes; and cross-clamp times averaged 68, 58, and 57 minutes (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The incidences of major morbidity (10.1%, 12.3%, 12.8%) and operative mortality (0.8%, 1.5%, 2.1%) were similar after operations performed by CT1, CT2, and staff surgeons, respectively (p > 0.15 for all). In univariate and multivariate analyses, the seniority of the primary surgeon did not independently predict morbidity or perioperative mortality. On follow-up (mean, 1,485 +/- 1,015 days), there was no significant difference in patient survival (log-rank, p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Lower academic seniority was associated with longer CABG operative times but did not affect outcomes. Thus, training residents to perform CABG is safe and is characterized by progressive improvement in their technical efficiency.

Assessment of aortic pathology and peripheral arterial disease using multidetector computed tomographic angiography.

The development of multidetector computed tomography represents a remarkable diagnostic advancement because this imaging modality has been widely used in the evaluation of the cardiovascular system. With scanner-adjusted image acquisition and contrast medium administration, multidetector computed tomographic angiography provides a cost-effective and accurate imaging assessment in patients with aortic pathologies or peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography is associated with several advantages, including high image spatial resolution and rapid imaging acquisition speed. This diagnostic methodology allows accurate detection of a variety of intravascular lesions in the carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, renal arteries, and peripheral arterial systems. This article provides an overview of multidetector computed tomographic angiography in the assessment of arterial disease and reviews current literature about this diagnostic technology in the evaluation of aortic and peripheral arterial pathologies.