The DoCTRINE Guidelines: Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Education.

PURPOSE: Reporting guidelines assist authors in conducting and describing their research in alignment with evidence-based and expert-determined standards. However, published research-oriented guidelines do not capture all of the components that must be present in descriptions of educational innovations in health professions education. The authors aimed to create guidelines for educational innovations in curriculum development that would be easy for early-career educators to use, support reporting necessary details, and promote educational scholarship. METHOD: Beginning in 2017, the authors systematically developed a reporting checklist for educational innovations in curriculum development, called Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Education (DoCTRINE), and collected validity evidence for its use according to the 4 inferences of Kane's framework. They derived the items using a modified Delphi method, followed by pilot testing, cognitive interviewing, and interrater reliability testing. In May-November 2019, they implemented DoCTRINE for authors submitting to MedEdPORTAL, half of whom were randomized to receive the checklist (intervention group). The authors scored manuscripts using DoCTRINE while blinded to group assignment, and they collected data on final editorial decisions. RESULTS: The final DoCTRINE checklist consists of 19 items, categorized into 5 components: introduction, curriculum development, curriculum implementation, results, and discussion. The overall interrater agreement was 0.91. Among the 108 manuscripts submitted to MedEdPORTAL during the study period, the mean (SD) total score was higher for accepted than rejected submissions (16.9 [1.73] vs 15.7 [2.24], P = .006). There were no significant differences in DoCTRINE scores between the intervention group, who received the checklist, and the control group, who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed DoCTRINE, using systematic approaches, for the scholarly reporting of educational innovations in curriculum development. This checklist may be a useful tool for supporting the publishing efforts of early-career faculty.

Predictors of hysterectomy use and satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To identify static and time-varying sociodemographic, clinical, health-related quality-of-life and attitudinal predictors of use and satisfaction with hysterectomy for noncancerous conditions. METHODS: The Study of Pelvic Problems, Hysterectomy, and Intervention Alternatives (SOPHIA) was conducted from 1998 to 2008. English-, Spanish-, or Chinese-speaking premenopausal women (n=1,420) with intact uteri who had sought care for pelvic pressure, bleeding, or pain from an academic medical center, county hospital, closed-panel health maintenance organization, or one of several community-based practices in the San Francisco Bay area were interviewed annually for up to 8 years. Primary outcomes were use of and satisfaction with hysterectomy. RESULTS: A total of 207 women (14.6%) underwent hysterectomy. In addition to well-established clinical predictors (entering menopause, symptomatic leiomyomas, prior treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, and less symptom resolution), greater symptom impact on sex (P=.001), higher 12-Item Short Form Health Survey mental component summary scores (P=.010), and higher scores on an attitude measure describing "benefits of not having a uterus" and lower "hysterectomy concerns" scores (P<.001 for each) were predictive of hysterectomy use. Most participants who underwent hysterectomy were very (63.9%) or somewhat (21.4%) satisfied in the year after the procedure, and we observed significant variations in posthysterectomy satisfaction across the clinical sites (omnibus P=.036). Other determinants of postsurgical satisfaction included higher pelvic problem impact (P=.035) and "benefits of not having a uterus" scores (P=.008) before surgery and greater posthysterectomy symptom resolution (P=.001). CONCLUSION: Numerous factors beyond clinical symptoms predict hysterectomy use and satisfaction. Providers should discuss health-related quality of life, sexual function, and attitudes with patients to help identify those who are most likely to benefit from this procedure.

Randomized trial of medical treatment versus hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding: resource use in the Medicine or Surgery (Ms) trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare resource use outcomes for participants in the Medicine or Surgery (Ms) randomized trial. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized controlled trial, we compared resources used during a 24-month follow-up period by women with abnormal uterine bleeding who were randomly assigned to either expanded medical treatment or hysterectomy. RESULTS: Women randomly assigned to hysterectomy used significantly more resources (medicine = $4479, hysterectomy = $6777; P = .03), with almost all the difference caused by the hysterectomy procedure. Fifty-three percent of women randomly assigned to medicine had a hysterectomy during the follow-up period; women who were able to continue on medical therapy had mean total resource use of $2595 compared with $6128 for medicine patients who eventually had surgery. CONCLUSION: For women with abnormal uterine bleeding refractory to cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate, compared with expanded medical treatment, hysterectomy increases resource use significantly and results in better clinical and 6-month quality-of-life outcomes.

How do women of diverse backgrounds value prenatal testing outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: To describe women's preferences for prenatal testing outcomes and to explore their association with sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 584 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse pregnant women aged 16 to 47 years recruited from 23 San Francisco Bay Area practices. We assessed preferences for 12 potential prenatal testing outcomes using the time trade-off metric for all outcomes and the standard gamble metric for two outcomes. Preferences were calculated on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Participants also completed a sociodemographic and attitude survey. RESULTS: Highest preference scores were assigned to outcomes resulting in the birth of a chromosomally normal infant (mean = 0.91-0.93; median = 0.99-1.00). Lower scores were obtained for outcomes involving pregnancy loss (mean = 0.69-0.87; median = 0.76-0.92), which were correlated with attitudes regarding miscarriage, pregnancy termination, and Down syndrome. The lowest scores were assigned to Down syndrome-affected births (mean = 0.67-0.69; median = 0.73-0.75), which also were correlated with attitudes toward Down syndrome. We did not find a statistically significant relationship between participants' preference scores and age. CONCLUSION: Preferences for prenatal testing outcomes vary according to the pregnant women's underlying attitudes about pregnancy loss and Down syndrome, and not according to her age. Current age/risk-based guidelines should account for individual variation in patient preferences.

Resource use for total and supracervical hysterectomies: results of a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: Hysterectomy is the most common major surgical procedure performed in the United States for nonobstetric reasons. Although most hysterectomies include removal of the cervix, the rate of supracervical procedures has increased in recent years. To provide evidence about the outcomes of both types of hysterectomy, we conducted a randomized clinical trial of total (TAH) or supracervical (SCH) hysterectomy (the "TOSH" trial). We report here an analysis of 24-month resource use by patients in this trial. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed at 3 clinical centers to compare resources used by 120 patients who received a total or supracervical abdominal hysterectomy. Service use during a 24-month follow-up period was identified from medical and billing records and patient reports. Each service used was assigned a relative value, which was then converted into 2002 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Overall resource use was similar in the 2 study groups in the first 12 months after randomization (TAH 5,870 US dollars; SCH 6,018 US dollars; 95% confidence interval for difference -960 US dollars, 1,255 US dollars; P <.79) and for the full 24 months (TAH 6,448 US dollars; SCH 7,479 US dollars; 95% confidence interval for difference -533 US dollars, 2,616 US dollars; P <.20). In exploratory multivariable analyses, resource use was significantly associated with baseline body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg/m(2) (8,440 US dollars versus 6,398 US dollars, P =.02) and heavy bleeding (7,550 US dollars versus 5,368 US dollars, P =.02). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of medical care resources over a 24-month period is comparable for total and supracervical hysterectomy. The association of a woman's weight and bleeding pattern with subsequent resource use requires further investigation.

Medicine or Surgery (Ms): a randomized clinical trial comparing hysterectomy and medical treatment in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Hysterectomy may be overused as treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding due to benign causes in reproductive women. Medical therapies are an alternative, and there is a need for randomized trials comparing the outcomes of these approaches. Women of reproductive age who continued to have bothersome abnormal uterine bleeding after cyclic hormonal treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 10-20 mg for 10-14 days/month) for 3-5 months were invited to participate in a randomized trial of hysterectomy versus other medical therapies. Participating gynecologists were free to choose the particular surgical (transabdominal or transvaginal) or medical (generally oral contraceptives and/or a prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor) approaches. Outcomes during 2 years of follow-up include quality of life (primary), sexual function, clinical effectiveness and cost. We screened 1557 women to find 413 who began 3-5 months of MPA; 215 completed this treatment, of whom 102 still had bothersome symptoms, and of these 38 consented to be randomized. Another 25 women with bothersome symptoms after a documented history of 3 months of cyclic MPA were also randomized, for a total of 63. The average age of randomized women was 41; 54% were African-American, and they reported uterine bleeding 12 days/month on average, heavy bleeding 6 days/month. Anemia (hematocrit<32) was present in 38% of African-Americans and 15% of Caucasians (p=0.05). Two thirds of the women had fibroids and 80% reported pelvic pain. Obesity was common (45% had a body mass index (BMI)>30), and associated with a longer duration of symptoms (12 vs. 4 years for BMI<25; p=0.02) and a greater prevalence of incontinence (44% vs. 16%; p=0.046). Although recruitment was difficult, we have completed enrollment in a randomized clinical trial comparing surgical and medical treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding.

Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: are there racial/ethnic differences?

The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R(2) values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions.