Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Toxicol Lett ; 332: 202-212, 2020 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32659469

RESUMO

A variety of methods have been developed for accurate and systematic evaluation of chemical genotoxicity. Ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) and 1,3-propane sultone (1,3-PS) have been extensively applied in industrial fields. Although 1,3-PS, but not CAN, has been reported as a potent carcinogen, systematic assessment of the genotoxic properties of these chemicals has not been conducted. The purpose of this study was to establish a decision tree for evaluating genotoxicity based on the good laboratory practices (GLP) system using 1,3-PS and CAN as test chemicals. In vitro studies were performed including the bacterial reverse mutation assay, chromosomal aberration assay, and micronucleus assay. We conducted in vivo studies using a combined micronucleus and alkaline comet (MN-CMT) assay and the Pig-a gene mutation assay, which is a promising method for detecting gene mutations in vivo. CAN showed negative responses in all in vitro genotoxicity assays and the in vivo combined MN-CMT assay. Meanwhile, 1,3-PS had positive results in all in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays. In this study, we confirmed the genotoxicity of 1,3-PS and CAN using both in vitro and in vivo assays. We propose a decision tree for evaluating chemical-induced genotoxicity.


Assuntos
Cério/toxicidade , Árvores de Decisões , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Tiofenos/toxicidade , Animais , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Aberrações Cromossômicas/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaio Cometa , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Dano ao DNA , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes para Micronúcleos , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Ratos Sprague-Dawley
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA