Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Surg Oncol ; 35: 120-125, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871546

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities are assumed to negatively affect treatment and outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our aim was to investigate the interaction of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic factors with stage of disease and type of treatment facility in receipt of treatment and overall survival (OS) of patients with HCC. METHODS: All patients with primary HCC in the US Safety-Net Collaborative database (2012-2014) were included. Patients were categorized into "safety-net" or "tertiary referral center" based on where they received treatment. Socioeconomic factors were determined at the zip-code level and included median income and percent of adults who graduated from high-school. Primary outcomes were receipt of treatment and OS. RESULTS: On MV Cox regression, neither race/ethnicity, median income, nor care provided at a SNH were associated with decreased OS (all p > 0.05). Independent predictors of decreased OS included lack of insurance (HR 1.34), less educational attainment (HR 1.59) higher MELD score (HR 1.07), higher stage at diagnosis (II:HR 1.34, III:HR 2.87, IV:HR 3.23), and not receiving treatment (HR 3.94) (all p < 0.05). Factors associated with not receiving treatment included history of alcohol abuse (OR 0.682), increasing MELD (OR 0.874), higher stage at diagnosis (III: OR 0.234, IV: OR 0.210) and care at a safety net facility (OR 0.424) There were no racial/ethnic or socioeconomic disparities in receipt of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is no intrinsic or direct association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or being treated at select safety-net hospitals with worse outcomes. Poor liver function, no insurance, and advanced stage of presentation are the main determinants of not receiving treatment and decreased survival.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(1): 15-20, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32424822

RESUMO

In 2011, the American Board of Surgery announced a new specialty board certification for Complex General Surgical Oncology. The development of a 2-year fellowship training curriculum was based on the core values of multidisciplinary care, surgical management of oncologic disease, education in basic research and clinical trial design, community outreach, patient counseling, and leadership in oncology. This article highlights the elements necessary for developing a fellowship training program in the context of these core values.


Assuntos
Currículo/normas , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Oncologia Cirúrgica/educação , Acreditação , Competência Clínica , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/normas , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Bolsas de Estudo/normas , Humanos , Oncologia Cirúrgica/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA