Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Indoor Air ; 30(1): 137-146, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31639236

RESUMO

An extensive evaluation of low-cost dust sensors was performed using an exponentially decaying particle concentration. A total of 264 sensors including 27 sensors with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and 237 sensors with laser lighting sources were tested. Those tested sensors were classified into 4 groups based on the deviation from the reference data obtained by a reference instrument. The response linearities of all the tested samples for PM1 , PM2.5 , and PM10 were in excellent agreement with the reference instrument, except a few samples. For the measurements of PM1 and PM2.5 , the lighting source, that is, LED or laser, did not show any significant difference in overall sensor performance. However, LED-based sensors did not perform well for PM10 measurements. The 32, 24, and 16% of all the tested sensors for PM1 , PM2.5 , and PM10 measurement, respectively, are in the category of Class 1 (reference instrument reading ± 20%) requirement. The performance of the low-cost dust sensors for PM10 measurement was relatively less satisfactory.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Poeira/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental/economia , Monitoramento Ambiental/instrumentação , Material Particulado/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA