Child Psychotherapy Training in the United States: A National Survey of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Fellowship Program Directors.

OBJECTIVES: Training in child and adolescent psychotherapy continues to be emphasized by accrediting organizations (ACGME and ABPN) but it is not known how these skills are taught and what types of therapy are highlighted in fellowships across the United States. METHODS: A 16-question anonymous online survey was developed by the authors and covered six main areas: demographics, the priority of psychotherapy in training, the competency goals for different psychotherapy modalities, training strategies, types of supervision, and program directors' satisfaction of their training implementation and assessment of trainees. The survey was sent to every identified CAP program director during a three-month period in early 2017. RESULTS: Data was gathered from 53 of the 131 program directors surveyed, giving a 40% response rate. Ninety percent of CAP program directors strongly agree or agree that it is important to preserve and promote training and practice of psychotherapy. Most (83%) program directors indicated competence or expertise as a training goal for CBT with more variability among programs for other psychotherapies. Seventy percent of program directors agree that their program provides adequate time for learning and practicing psychotherapy but the allotted time for psychotherapy is low across majority of programs over both years of training. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that there is a gap between the goals of providing optimal training in psychotherapy with the low amount of protected time for the practice of psychotherapy. These results should provide a foundation for program directors to learn from each other about developing, improving, and implementing effective psychotherapy training.

Cost effectiveness of chest computed tomography after lung cancer resection: a decision analysis model.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative surveillance with chest computed tomography (CT) is often performed in patients who have undergone resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), despite lack of supporting data. This study involves the creation of a decision analysis model to predict the cost effectiveness of postoperative surveillance CT. METHODS: A decision analysis model was created in which a hypothetical cohort of patients underwent annual chest CT after resection of a stage IA NSCLC. The incidence of second primary lung cancer (SPLC), sensitivity and specificity of CT, as well as survival after resection of initial primary and SPLC were derived from published literature. The cost of CT and other procedures prompted by a positive finding on CT was calculated from Medicare reimbursement schedules. Cost effectiveness was defined as a cost of less than 60,000 dollars per quality-adjusted life-year gained in the cohort under surveillance compared with controls under no surveillance. RESULTS: In the initial (base case) analysis, the cost of surveillance CT was 47,676 dollars per quality-adjusted life-year gained, implying cost effectiveness. However, factors that rendered surveillance CT cost ineffective were (1) age at entry into the surveillance program greater than 65 years, (2) cost of CT greater than 700 dollars, (3) incidence of SPLC of less than 1.6% per patient per year of follow-up, and (4) a false positive rate of surveillance CT greater than 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance with postoperative CT may be a cost-effective intervention to detect SPLC in selected patients with previously resected stage IA NSCLC.

Surveillance computed tomography after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer: results and costs.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of defined abnormalities on surveillance computed tomography after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer, as well as the nature and cost of further testing prompted by these abnormalities. We also sought to determine whether resectable metachronous lung cancer can be detected with surveillance scans. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients who presented for follow-up in 2002 after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Data collected included demographics, clinicopathologic features of the initial lung cancer, the number and results of surveillance computed tomographic scans performed in 2002, the attending surgeons' impressions of the surveillance scans, the nature of any abnormalities and further diagnostic testing prompted by these abnormalities, and the nature of any lung cancer detected on surveillance scans, as well as the treatment rendered. The cost of surveillance scanning and associated diagnostics was computed by using Medicare fee schedules. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study cohort. One hundred sixty-eight surveillance scans were performed in 140 of these patients. One hundred five scans were interpreted as abnormal by the radiologist with regard to pulmonary nodules, adenopathy, or pleural fluid, but the surgeon was suspicious for recurrent or new primary lung cancer in only 32 of 105 scans. Further workup revealed recurrent or new primary lung cancer in 16 of 32 patients, with 6 undergoing resection for localized disease. The cost of the surveillance scans and associated care in the study cohort were 16.6% higher than the cost of care in a hypothetically identical cohort not subjected to surveillance scanning. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance computed tomography is frequently abnormal after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer; however, the majority of these abnormalities are not clinically suspicious. Resectable metachronous lung cancer is detected by using surveillance scanning; however, the use of this modality can be associated with increased cost.